Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin

Ben H Boedeker, Mary A.Barak Bernhagen, David J. Miller, D. John Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To compare the straight Magill and the curved Boedeker Intubation Forceps in foreign body removal in a manikin with a difficult airway using the videolaryngoscope. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: University Medical Center. Subjects: 17 medical providers, 16 anesthesia staff, and one respiratory therapist. Measurements: The observed Cormack-Lehane (CL) glottic view and success/failure of the removal attempts were recorded. Main Results: The CL scores obtained using the Magill and Boedeker forceps were not significantly different (P = 0.3984). However, the differences in success rates for removal of the foreign object using standard (0 = success, 17 = failure) and Boedeker forceps (0 = failure, 17 = success) were strongly significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The curve of the Boedeker Intubation Forceps allows both the tip of the forceps and the glottic opening to be simultaneously visible in the field of view during videolaryngoscopy, making removal of glottic foreign bodies easier.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-27
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Manikins
Foreign Bodies
Surgical Instruments
Intubation
Tongue
Anesthesia
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Forceps
  • Foreign body removal
  • Indirect visualization
  • Videolaryngoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin. / Boedeker, Ben H; Bernhagen, Mary A.Barak; Miller, David J.; Doyle, D. John.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 25-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boedeker, Ben H ; Bernhagen, Mary A.Barak ; Miller, David J. ; Doyle, D. John. / Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin. In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 25-27.
@article{ef72f5733f6f4d108d9e53df068541e1,
title = "Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin",
abstract = "Study Objective: To compare the straight Magill and the curved Boedeker Intubation Forceps in foreign body removal in a manikin with a difficult airway using the videolaryngoscope. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: University Medical Center. Subjects: 17 medical providers, 16 anesthesia staff, and one respiratory therapist. Measurements: The observed Cormack-Lehane (CL) glottic view and success/failure of the removal attempts were recorded. Main Results: The CL scores obtained using the Magill and Boedeker forceps were not significantly different (P = 0.3984). However, the differences in success rates for removal of the foreign object using standard (0 = success, 17 = failure) and Boedeker forceps (0 = failure, 17 = success) were strongly significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The curve of the Boedeker Intubation Forceps allows both the tip of the forceps and the glottic opening to be simultaneously visible in the field of view during videolaryngoscopy, making removal of glottic foreign bodies easier.",
keywords = "Forceps, Foreign body removal, Indirect visualization, Videolaryngoscopy",
author = "Boedeker, {Ben H} and Bernhagen, {Mary A.Barak} and Miller, {David J.} and Doyle, {D. John}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.04.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "25--27",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin

AU - Boedeker, Ben H

AU - Bernhagen, Mary A.Barak

AU - Miller, David J.

AU - Doyle, D. John

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Study Objective: To compare the straight Magill and the curved Boedeker Intubation Forceps in foreign body removal in a manikin with a difficult airway using the videolaryngoscope. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: University Medical Center. Subjects: 17 medical providers, 16 anesthesia staff, and one respiratory therapist. Measurements: The observed Cormack-Lehane (CL) glottic view and success/failure of the removal attempts were recorded. Main Results: The CL scores obtained using the Magill and Boedeker forceps were not significantly different (P = 0.3984). However, the differences in success rates for removal of the foreign object using standard (0 = success, 17 = failure) and Boedeker forceps (0 = failure, 17 = success) were strongly significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The curve of the Boedeker Intubation Forceps allows both the tip of the forceps and the glottic opening to be simultaneously visible in the field of view during videolaryngoscopy, making removal of glottic foreign bodies easier.

AB - Study Objective: To compare the straight Magill and the curved Boedeker Intubation Forceps in foreign body removal in a manikin with a difficult airway using the videolaryngoscope. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: University Medical Center. Subjects: 17 medical providers, 16 anesthesia staff, and one respiratory therapist. Measurements: The observed Cormack-Lehane (CL) glottic view and success/failure of the removal attempts were recorded. Main Results: The CL scores obtained using the Magill and Boedeker forceps were not significantly different (P = 0.3984). However, the differences in success rates for removal of the foreign object using standard (0 = success, 17 = failure) and Boedeker forceps (0 = failure, 17 = success) were strongly significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The curve of the Boedeker Intubation Forceps allows both the tip of the forceps and the glottic opening to be simultaneously visible in the field of view during videolaryngoscopy, making removal of glottic foreign bodies easier.

KW - Forceps

KW - Foreign body removal

KW - Indirect visualization

KW - Videolaryngoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863023567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863023567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.04.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.04.013

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 25

EP - 27

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 1

ER -