Comparison of several testing strategies for combination drug efficacy trials based on the closure principle

Julia N Soulakova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The author discusses three multiple testing procedures for identifying the minimum efficacious doses in a balanced factorial combination drug trial. All of these procedures utilize the closed testing principle, and hence strongly control the overall error rate and satisfy the coherence property, that is, if a hypothesis is retained then any hypothesis implied by it is also retained. While coherence is an essential requirement for any multiple testing procedure, consonance is a highly desirable characteristic. In the considered settings if a testing procedure is consonant then it always provides a set of all minimum efficacious combinations as a result, otherwise, it may lead to ambiguity. Although the coherence property is satisfied for any closed testing procedure and thus, does not depend on the test used for an individual hypothesis, whether the considered procedures satisfy the consonance property depends entirely on the nature of the test statistic. The author identifies the consonant and non-consonant procedures among the presented procedures and discusses possible drawbacks of non-consonant procedures with respect to combination drug efficacy trials. Additional properties of these procedures are assessed by simulations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-273
Number of pages14
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 30 2009

Fingerprint

Drug Combinations
Efficacy
Drugs
Closure
Testing
Multiple Testing
Strategy
Closed
Factorial
Test Statistic
Error Rate
Dose
Requirements

Keywords

  • Average test
  • Consonance
  • Maximum test
  • Minimum effective dose
  • Step-wise procedure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Comparison of several testing strategies for combination drug efficacy trials based on the closure principle. / Soulakova, Julia N.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 2, 30.01.2009, p. 260-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22c3dbabbd134f9dbed25f258acac1bc,
title = "Comparison of several testing strategies for combination drug efficacy trials based on the closure principle",
abstract = "The author discusses three multiple testing procedures for identifying the minimum efficacious doses in a balanced factorial combination drug trial. All of these procedures utilize the closed testing principle, and hence strongly control the overall error rate and satisfy the coherence property, that is, if a hypothesis is retained then any hypothesis implied by it is also retained. While coherence is an essential requirement for any multiple testing procedure, consonance is a highly desirable characteristic. In the considered settings if a testing procedure is consonant then it always provides a set of all minimum efficacious combinations as a result, otherwise, it may lead to ambiguity. Although the coherence property is satisfied for any closed testing procedure and thus, does not depend on the test used for an individual hypothesis, whether the considered procedures satisfy the consonance property depends entirely on the nature of the test statistic. The author identifies the consonant and non-consonant procedures among the presented procedures and discusses possible drawbacks of non-consonant procedures with respect to combination drug efficacy trials. Additional properties of these procedures are assessed by simulations.",
keywords = "Average test, Consonance, Maximum test, Minimum effective dose, Step-wise procedure",
author = "Soulakova, {Julia N}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/sim.3462",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "260--273",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of several testing strategies for combination drug efficacy trials based on the closure principle

AU - Soulakova, Julia N

PY - 2009/1/30

Y1 - 2009/1/30

N2 - The author discusses three multiple testing procedures for identifying the minimum efficacious doses in a balanced factorial combination drug trial. All of these procedures utilize the closed testing principle, and hence strongly control the overall error rate and satisfy the coherence property, that is, if a hypothesis is retained then any hypothesis implied by it is also retained. While coherence is an essential requirement for any multiple testing procedure, consonance is a highly desirable characteristic. In the considered settings if a testing procedure is consonant then it always provides a set of all minimum efficacious combinations as a result, otherwise, it may lead to ambiguity. Although the coherence property is satisfied for any closed testing procedure and thus, does not depend on the test used for an individual hypothesis, whether the considered procedures satisfy the consonance property depends entirely on the nature of the test statistic. The author identifies the consonant and non-consonant procedures among the presented procedures and discusses possible drawbacks of non-consonant procedures with respect to combination drug efficacy trials. Additional properties of these procedures are assessed by simulations.

AB - The author discusses three multiple testing procedures for identifying the minimum efficacious doses in a balanced factorial combination drug trial. All of these procedures utilize the closed testing principle, and hence strongly control the overall error rate and satisfy the coherence property, that is, if a hypothesis is retained then any hypothesis implied by it is also retained. While coherence is an essential requirement for any multiple testing procedure, consonance is a highly desirable characteristic. In the considered settings if a testing procedure is consonant then it always provides a set of all minimum efficacious combinations as a result, otherwise, it may lead to ambiguity. Although the coherence property is satisfied for any closed testing procedure and thus, does not depend on the test used for an individual hypothesis, whether the considered procedures satisfy the consonance property depends entirely on the nature of the test statistic. The author identifies the consonant and non-consonant procedures among the presented procedures and discusses possible drawbacks of non-consonant procedures with respect to combination drug efficacy trials. Additional properties of these procedures are assessed by simulations.

KW - Average test

KW - Consonance

KW - Maximum test

KW - Minimum effective dose

KW - Step-wise procedure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61749086715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61749086715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sim.3462

DO - 10.1002/sim.3462

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 260

EP - 273

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 2

ER -