Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the postoperative problems, evaluation and response of symptoms, and functional status (physiologic and psychosocial functioning) during the early recovery period (2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery) in 35 individuals who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (n=24) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (n=11). The most frequent postoperative problem reported by the coronary artery bypass grafting group was an incisional infection (either sternal or leg); 26% reported infection at 2 and 4 weeks, and 21% at 6 weeks after surgery. Respiratory problems (pleural effusion, pneumonia) were the second most frequently reported problem, reported by 10% of the subjects at 2 and 4 weeks and by 16% at 6 weeks. Other, less frequent problems were severe nervousness, rhythm problems, and pericarditis. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass patients reported fewer postoperative or cardiac-related problems, as only 5% indicated a problem with heart failure at both 2 and 4 weeks, and 36% reported being very nervous or having emotional problems at 4 weeks. Unlike postoperative problems, there were numerous similarities in postprocedural symptoms between these two groups. Fatigue, shortness of breath, and pain were the major symptoms reported postdischarge by both groups in this study. In addition, sleeping problems were also fairly prevalent in the coronary artery bypass grafting group, which is understandable, considering the fatigue ratings. Physiologic and psychosocial functioning varied minimally between the two procedures. While there were many similarities in the recovery patterns of both groups, the occurrence of postprocedural problems and symptoms of these two patient groups should be considered by clinicians to further tailor patient education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-141
Number of pages10
JournalProgress in cardiovascular nursing
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Fatigue
Symptom Assessment
Pericarditis
Patient Education
Pleural Effusion
Infection
Dyspnea
Leg
Pneumonia
Anxiety
Heart Failure
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{48609016d2d6497c98f4a7b4f4f3ab1c,
title = "Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period.",
abstract = "The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the postoperative problems, evaluation and response of symptoms, and functional status (physiologic and psychosocial functioning) during the early recovery period (2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery) in 35 individuals who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (n=24) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (n=11). The most frequent postoperative problem reported by the coronary artery bypass grafting group was an incisional infection (either sternal or leg); 26{\%} reported infection at 2 and 4 weeks, and 21{\%} at 6 weeks after surgery. Respiratory problems (pleural effusion, pneumonia) were the second most frequently reported problem, reported by 10{\%} of the subjects at 2 and 4 weeks and by 16{\%} at 6 weeks. Other, less frequent problems were severe nervousness, rhythm problems, and pericarditis. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass patients reported fewer postoperative or cardiac-related problems, as only 5{\%} indicated a problem with heart failure at both 2 and 4 weeks, and 36{\%} reported being very nervous or having emotional problems at 4 weeks. Unlike postoperative problems, there were numerous similarities in postprocedural symptoms between these two groups. Fatigue, shortness of breath, and pain were the major symptoms reported postdischarge by both groups in this study. In addition, sleeping problems were also fairly prevalent in the coronary artery bypass grafting group, which is understandable, considering the fatigue ratings. Physiologic and psychosocial functioning varied minimally between the two procedures. While there were many similarities in the recovery patterns of both groups, the occurrence of postprocedural problems and symptoms of these two patient groups should be considered by clinicians to further tailor patient education.",
author = "Zimmerman, {Lani M} and Barnason, {Susan Ann} and Brey, {Bet A.} and Catlin, {Sandy S.} and Nieveen, {Janet Louise}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.0889-7204.2002.00764.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "132--141",
journal = "Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-7204",
publisher = "Le Jacq Communications, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period.

AU - Zimmerman, Lani M

AU - Barnason, Susan Ann

AU - Brey, Bet A.

AU - Catlin, Sandy S.

AU - Nieveen, Janet Louise

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the postoperative problems, evaluation and response of symptoms, and functional status (physiologic and psychosocial functioning) during the early recovery period (2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery) in 35 individuals who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (n=24) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (n=11). The most frequent postoperative problem reported by the coronary artery bypass grafting group was an incisional infection (either sternal or leg); 26% reported infection at 2 and 4 weeks, and 21% at 6 weeks after surgery. Respiratory problems (pleural effusion, pneumonia) were the second most frequently reported problem, reported by 10% of the subjects at 2 and 4 weeks and by 16% at 6 weeks. Other, less frequent problems were severe nervousness, rhythm problems, and pericarditis. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass patients reported fewer postoperative or cardiac-related problems, as only 5% indicated a problem with heart failure at both 2 and 4 weeks, and 36% reported being very nervous or having emotional problems at 4 weeks. Unlike postoperative problems, there were numerous similarities in postprocedural symptoms between these two groups. Fatigue, shortness of breath, and pain were the major symptoms reported postdischarge by both groups in this study. In addition, sleeping problems were also fairly prevalent in the coronary artery bypass grafting group, which is understandable, considering the fatigue ratings. Physiologic and psychosocial functioning varied minimally between the two procedures. While there were many similarities in the recovery patterns of both groups, the occurrence of postprocedural problems and symptoms of these two patient groups should be considered by clinicians to further tailor patient education.

AB - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the postoperative problems, evaluation and response of symptoms, and functional status (physiologic and psychosocial functioning) during the early recovery period (2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery) in 35 individuals who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (n=24) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (n=11). The most frequent postoperative problem reported by the coronary artery bypass grafting group was an incisional infection (either sternal or leg); 26% reported infection at 2 and 4 weeks, and 21% at 6 weeks after surgery. Respiratory problems (pleural effusion, pneumonia) were the second most frequently reported problem, reported by 10% of the subjects at 2 and 4 weeks and by 16% at 6 weeks. Other, less frequent problems were severe nervousness, rhythm problems, and pericarditis. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass patients reported fewer postoperative or cardiac-related problems, as only 5% indicated a problem with heart failure at both 2 and 4 weeks, and 36% reported being very nervous or having emotional problems at 4 weeks. Unlike postoperative problems, there were numerous similarities in postprocedural symptoms between these two groups. Fatigue, shortness of breath, and pain were the major symptoms reported postdischarge by both groups in this study. In addition, sleeping problems were also fairly prevalent in the coronary artery bypass grafting group, which is understandable, considering the fatigue ratings. Physiologic and psychosocial functioning varied minimally between the two procedures. While there were many similarities in the recovery patterns of both groups, the occurrence of postprocedural problems and symptoms of these two patient groups should be considered by clinicians to further tailor patient education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036593041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036593041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2002.00764.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2002.00764.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12091762

AN - SCOPUS:0036593041

VL - 17

SP - 132

EP - 141

JO - Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-7204

IS - 3

ER -