Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks

Gurdas S. Sandhu, H. Christopher Frey, Shannon L Bartelt-Hunt, Elizabeth Jones

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions were measured for three refuse trucks, including one each of heavy-duty diesel front-loader, side-loader, and roll-off configurations in terms of operating mode bins defined by the USEPA for the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emission factor model. CO2, CO, HC, and NO emissions were measured. Fuel use and emission rates between truck configurations and cycles were compared. The side-loader truck had the highest time spent in idle mode while the roll-off truck had the highest time spent in speeds over 25 mph. The roll-off truck has the lowest, and the side-loader truck had the highest, distance based cycle fuel use and emission rates. Comparing duty cycles, the roll-off cycle had a higher proportion of operation in OpModes associated both with higher engine power demand, which led to higher time-based rates, but also with faster travel speed, which led to lower distance-based rates. Compared to real-world, MOVES2010 under-estimated the CO2 emission rates by 20% to 40% and the NOx emissions rates by 40% to 60%. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 108th AWMA Annual Conference and Exhibition (Raleigh, NC 6/22-25/2015).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots
Subtitle of host publicationEnvironmental Quality to Climate
PublisherAir and Waste Management Association
Pages1702-1711
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781510815582
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate, ACE 2015 - Raleigh, United States
Duration: Jun 22 2015Jun 25 2015

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA
Volume3
ISSN (Print)1052-6102

Other

Other108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate, ACE 2015
CountryUnited States
CityRaleigh
Period6/22/156/25/15

Fingerprint

refuse
Trucks
diesel
simulator
Loaders
Simulators
Bins
motor vehicle emission
comparison
rate
engine
Engines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Sandhu, G. S., Frey, H. C., Bartelt-Hunt, S. L., & Jones, E. (2015). Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks. In 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate (pp. 1702-1711). (Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA; Vol. 3). Air and Waste Management Association.

Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks. / Sandhu, Gurdas S.; Frey, H. Christopher; Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon L; Jones, Elizabeth.

108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate. Air and Waste Management Association, 2015. p. 1702-1711 (Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA; Vol. 3).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Sandhu, GS, Frey, HC, Bartelt-Hunt, SL & Jones, E 2015, Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks. in 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate. Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA, vol. 3, Air and Waste Management Association, pp. 1702-1711, 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate, ACE 2015, Raleigh, United States, 6/22/15.
Sandhu GS, Frey HC, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Jones E. Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks. In 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate. Air and Waste Management Association. 2015. p. 1702-1711. (Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA).
Sandhu, Gurdas S. ; Frey, H. Christopher ; Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon L ; Jones, Elizabeth. / Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks. 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots: Environmental Quality to Climate. Air and Waste Management Association, 2015. pp. 1702-1711 (Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA).
@inproceedings{d33840b1a6dc45d099a8e144ef2ea16b,
title = "Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks",
abstract = "Real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions were measured for three refuse trucks, including one each of heavy-duty diesel front-loader, side-loader, and roll-off configurations in terms of operating mode bins defined by the USEPA for the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emission factor model. CO2, CO, HC, and NO emissions were measured. Fuel use and emission rates between truck configurations and cycles were compared. The side-loader truck had the highest time spent in idle mode while the roll-off truck had the highest time spent in speeds over 25 mph. The roll-off truck has the lowest, and the side-loader truck had the highest, distance based cycle fuel use and emission rates. Comparing duty cycles, the roll-off cycle had a higher proportion of operation in OpModes associated both with higher engine power demand, which led to higher time-based rates, but also with faster travel speed, which led to lower distance-based rates. Compared to real-world, MOVES2010 under-estimated the CO2 emission rates by 20{\%} to 40{\%} and the NOx emissions rates by 40{\%} to 60{\%}. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 108th AWMA Annual Conference and Exhibition (Raleigh, NC 6/22-25/2015).",
author = "Sandhu, {Gurdas S.} and Frey, {H. Christopher} and Bartelt-Hunt, {Shannon L} and Elizabeth Jones",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA",
publisher = "Air and Waste Management Association",
pages = "1702--1711",
booktitle = "108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of real-world and MOVES estimated emissions for heavy-duty diesel refuse trucks

AU - Sandhu, Gurdas S.

AU - Frey, H. Christopher

AU - Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon L

AU - Jones, Elizabeth

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions were measured for three refuse trucks, including one each of heavy-duty diesel front-loader, side-loader, and roll-off configurations in terms of operating mode bins defined by the USEPA for the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emission factor model. CO2, CO, HC, and NO emissions were measured. Fuel use and emission rates between truck configurations and cycles were compared. The side-loader truck had the highest time spent in idle mode while the roll-off truck had the highest time spent in speeds over 25 mph. The roll-off truck has the lowest, and the side-loader truck had the highest, distance based cycle fuel use and emission rates. Comparing duty cycles, the roll-off cycle had a higher proportion of operation in OpModes associated both with higher engine power demand, which led to higher time-based rates, but also with faster travel speed, which led to lower distance-based rates. Compared to real-world, MOVES2010 under-estimated the CO2 emission rates by 20% to 40% and the NOx emissions rates by 40% to 60%. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 108th AWMA Annual Conference and Exhibition (Raleigh, NC 6/22-25/2015).

AB - Real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions were measured for three refuse trucks, including one each of heavy-duty diesel front-loader, side-loader, and roll-off configurations in terms of operating mode bins defined by the USEPA for the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emission factor model. CO2, CO, HC, and NO emissions were measured. Fuel use and emission rates between truck configurations and cycles were compared. The side-loader truck had the highest time spent in idle mode while the roll-off truck had the highest time spent in speeds over 25 mph. The roll-off truck has the lowest, and the side-loader truck had the highest, distance based cycle fuel use and emission rates. Comparing duty cycles, the roll-off cycle had a higher proportion of operation in OpModes associated both with higher engine power demand, which led to higher time-based rates, but also with faster travel speed, which led to lower distance-based rates. Compared to real-world, MOVES2010 under-estimated the CO2 emission rates by 20% to 40% and the NOx emissions rates by 40% to 60%. This is an abstract of a paper presented at the 108th AWMA Annual Conference and Exhibition (Raleigh, NC 6/22-25/2015).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983775253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983775253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84983775253

T3 - Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA

SP - 1702

EP - 1711

BT - 108th Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition, ACE 2015 - Connecting the Dots

PB - Air and Waste Management Association

ER -