Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flaps can be performed using various plating techniques. Miniplates (≤2.0 mm) and reconstruction plates (>2.0 mm) have different characteristics that provide theoretical advantages and disadvantages with regard to successful neomandibular fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of 117 patients undergoing free fibular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects over the past 10 years was performed. Characteristic data and complication rates were recorded; the authors compared patients who had fibular reconstruction of their mandibular defect with miniplates (n = 86) with those who underwent repair using reconstruction plates (n = 31). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing miniplates and reconstruction plates with regard to overall cumulative complication rates (46 versus 48 percent), flap failure (15 percent versus 27 percent), plate extrusion (23 percent versus 25 percent), malunion or nonunion (14 percent versus 13 percent), and plate fracture (10 percent versus 0 percent). (The cumulative percentage incidence weighs patient data according to length of follow-up.) The authors' data did suggest a decreased incidence of osteonecrosis in the miniplate group (5 percent versus 38 percent; p = 0.02), but these results must be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Selection of plate size, miniplate versus reconstruction plate, does not appear to affect the overall rate of complications in free fibular reconstruction of the mandible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1733-1738
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume122
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Mandibular Reconstruction
Mandible
Osteonecrosis
Free Tissue Flaps
Incidence
Sample Size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible. / Robey, Ashley B.; Spann, Michael L.; McAuliff, Timothy M.; Meza, Jane L; Hollins, Ronald Ray; Johnson, Perry James.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 122, No. 6, 01.12.2008, p. 1733-1738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{037a8452e4b8493fbd68e96665a9914d,
title = "Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flaps can be performed using various plating techniques. Miniplates (≤2.0 mm) and reconstruction plates (>2.0 mm) have different characteristics that provide theoretical advantages and disadvantages with regard to successful neomandibular fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of 117 patients undergoing free fibular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects over the past 10 years was performed. Characteristic data and complication rates were recorded; the authors compared patients who had fibular reconstruction of their mandibular defect with miniplates (n = 86) with those who underwent repair using reconstruction plates (n = 31). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing miniplates and reconstruction plates with regard to overall cumulative complication rates (46 versus 48 percent), flap failure (15 percent versus 27 percent), plate extrusion (23 percent versus 25 percent), malunion or nonunion (14 percent versus 13 percent), and plate fracture (10 percent versus 0 percent). (The cumulative percentage incidence weighs patient data according to length of follow-up.) The authors' data did suggest a decreased incidence of osteonecrosis in the miniplate group (5 percent versus 38 percent; p = 0.02), but these results must be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Selection of plate size, miniplate versus reconstruction plate, does not appear to affect the overall rate of complications in free fibular reconstruction of the mandible.",
author = "Robey, {Ashley B.} and Spann, {Michael L.} and McAuliff, {Timothy M.} and Meza, {Jane L} and Hollins, {Ronald Ray} and Johnson, {Perry James}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9ac5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "1733--1738",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in fibular flap reconstruction of the mandible

AU - Robey, Ashley B.

AU - Spann, Michael L.

AU - McAuliff, Timothy M.

AU - Meza, Jane L

AU - Hollins, Ronald Ray

AU - Johnson, Perry James

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flaps can be performed using various plating techniques. Miniplates (≤2.0 mm) and reconstruction plates (>2.0 mm) have different characteristics that provide theoretical advantages and disadvantages with regard to successful neomandibular fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of 117 patients undergoing free fibular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects over the past 10 years was performed. Characteristic data and complication rates were recorded; the authors compared patients who had fibular reconstruction of their mandibular defect with miniplates (n = 86) with those who underwent repair using reconstruction plates (n = 31). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing miniplates and reconstruction plates with regard to overall cumulative complication rates (46 versus 48 percent), flap failure (15 percent versus 27 percent), plate extrusion (23 percent versus 25 percent), malunion or nonunion (14 percent versus 13 percent), and plate fracture (10 percent versus 0 percent). (The cumulative percentage incidence weighs patient data according to length of follow-up.) The authors' data did suggest a decreased incidence of osteonecrosis in the miniplate group (5 percent versus 38 percent; p = 0.02), but these results must be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Selection of plate size, miniplate versus reconstruction plate, does not appear to affect the overall rate of complications in free fibular reconstruction of the mandible.

AB - BACKGROUND: Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flaps can be performed using various plating techniques. Miniplates (≤2.0 mm) and reconstruction plates (>2.0 mm) have different characteristics that provide theoretical advantages and disadvantages with regard to successful neomandibular fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of 117 patients undergoing free fibular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects over the past 10 years was performed. Characteristic data and complication rates were recorded; the authors compared patients who had fibular reconstruction of their mandibular defect with miniplates (n = 86) with those who underwent repair using reconstruction plates (n = 31). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing miniplates and reconstruction plates with regard to overall cumulative complication rates (46 versus 48 percent), flap failure (15 percent versus 27 percent), plate extrusion (23 percent versus 25 percent), malunion or nonunion (14 percent versus 13 percent), and plate fracture (10 percent versus 0 percent). (The cumulative percentage incidence weighs patient data according to length of follow-up.) The authors' data did suggest a decreased incidence of osteonecrosis in the miniplate group (5 percent versus 38 percent; p = 0.02), but these results must be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Selection of plate size, miniplate versus reconstruction plate, does not appear to affect the overall rate of complications in free fibular reconstruction of the mandible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149397439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149397439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9ac5

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9ac5

M3 - Article

C2 - 19050525

AN - SCOPUS:58149397439

VL - 122

SP - 1733

EP - 1738

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -