Comparison of medication safety systems in critical access hospitals: Combined analysis of two studies

Gary L Cochran, Ryan S. Barrett, Susan D. Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The role of pharmacist transcription, onsite pharmacist dispensing, use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs), nurse-nurse double checks, or barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) in reducing medication error rates in critical access hospitals (CAHs) was evaluated. Methods. Investigators used the practice-based evidence methodology to identify predictors of medication errors in 12 Nebraska CAHs. Detailed information about each medication administered was recorded through direct observation. Errors were identified by comparing the observed medication administered with the physician's order. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were used to measure differences between groups of medication-dispensing procedures. Results. Nurses observed 6497 medications being administered to 1374 patients. The overall error rate was 1.2%. The transcription error rates for orders transcribed by an onsite pharmacist were slightly lower than for orders transcribed by a telepharmacy service (0.10% and 0.33%, respectively). Fewer dispensing errors occurred when medications were dispensed by an onsite pharmacist versus any other method of medication acquisition (0.10% versus 0.44%, p = 0.0085). The rates of dispensing errors for medications that were retrieved from a single-cell ADC (0.19%), a multicell ADC (0.45%), or a drug closet or general supply (0.77%) did not differ significantly. BCMA was associated with a higher proportion of dispensing and administration errors intercepted before reaching the patient (66.7%) compared with either manual double checks (10%) or no BCMA or double check (30.4%) of the medication before administration (p = 0.0167). Conclusion. Onsite pharmacist dispensing and BCMA were associated with fewer medication errors and are important components of a medication safety strategy in CAHs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1167-1173
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Volume73
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Medication Systems
Medication Errors
Pharmacists
Safety
Nurses
Evidence-Based Practice
Research Personnel
Observation
Physicians
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Comparison of medication safety systems in critical access hospitals : Combined analysis of two studies. / Cochran, Gary L; Barrett, Ryan S.; Horn, Susan D.

In: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 73, No. 15, 01.08.2016, p. 1167-1173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1dc4b5b401db4109b630aa381bce9ce7,
title = "Comparison of medication safety systems in critical access hospitals: Combined analysis of two studies",
abstract = "Purpose. The role of pharmacist transcription, onsite pharmacist dispensing, use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs), nurse-nurse double checks, or barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) in reducing medication error rates in critical access hospitals (CAHs) was evaluated. Methods. Investigators used the practice-based evidence methodology to identify predictors of medication errors in 12 Nebraska CAHs. Detailed information about each medication administered was recorded through direct observation. Errors were identified by comparing the observed medication administered with the physician's order. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were used to measure differences between groups of medication-dispensing procedures. Results. Nurses observed 6497 medications being administered to 1374 patients. The overall error rate was 1.2{\%}. The transcription error rates for orders transcribed by an onsite pharmacist were slightly lower than for orders transcribed by a telepharmacy service (0.10{\%} and 0.33{\%}, respectively). Fewer dispensing errors occurred when medications were dispensed by an onsite pharmacist versus any other method of medication acquisition (0.10{\%} versus 0.44{\%}, p = 0.0085). The rates of dispensing errors for medications that were retrieved from a single-cell ADC (0.19{\%}), a multicell ADC (0.45{\%}), or a drug closet or general supply (0.77{\%}) did not differ significantly. BCMA was associated with a higher proportion of dispensing and administration errors intercepted before reaching the patient (66.7{\%}) compared with either manual double checks (10{\%}) or no BCMA or double check (30.4{\%}) of the medication before administration (p = 0.0167). Conclusion. Onsite pharmacist dispensing and BCMA were associated with fewer medication errors and are important components of a medication safety strategy in CAHs.",
author = "Cochran, {Gary L} and Barrett, {Ryan S.} and Horn, {Susan D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2146/ajhp150760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1167--1173",
journal = "American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy",
issn = "1079-2082",
publisher = "American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacy",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of medication safety systems in critical access hospitals

T2 - Combined analysis of two studies

AU - Cochran, Gary L

AU - Barrett, Ryan S.

AU - Horn, Susan D.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Purpose. The role of pharmacist transcription, onsite pharmacist dispensing, use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs), nurse-nurse double checks, or barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) in reducing medication error rates in critical access hospitals (CAHs) was evaluated. Methods. Investigators used the practice-based evidence methodology to identify predictors of medication errors in 12 Nebraska CAHs. Detailed information about each medication administered was recorded through direct observation. Errors were identified by comparing the observed medication administered with the physician's order. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were used to measure differences between groups of medication-dispensing procedures. Results. Nurses observed 6497 medications being administered to 1374 patients. The overall error rate was 1.2%. The transcription error rates for orders transcribed by an onsite pharmacist were slightly lower than for orders transcribed by a telepharmacy service (0.10% and 0.33%, respectively). Fewer dispensing errors occurred when medications were dispensed by an onsite pharmacist versus any other method of medication acquisition (0.10% versus 0.44%, p = 0.0085). The rates of dispensing errors for medications that were retrieved from a single-cell ADC (0.19%), a multicell ADC (0.45%), or a drug closet or general supply (0.77%) did not differ significantly. BCMA was associated with a higher proportion of dispensing and administration errors intercepted before reaching the patient (66.7%) compared with either manual double checks (10%) or no BCMA or double check (30.4%) of the medication before administration (p = 0.0167). Conclusion. Onsite pharmacist dispensing and BCMA were associated with fewer medication errors and are important components of a medication safety strategy in CAHs.

AB - Purpose. The role of pharmacist transcription, onsite pharmacist dispensing, use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs), nurse-nurse double checks, or barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) in reducing medication error rates in critical access hospitals (CAHs) was evaluated. Methods. Investigators used the practice-based evidence methodology to identify predictors of medication errors in 12 Nebraska CAHs. Detailed information about each medication administered was recorded through direct observation. Errors were identified by comparing the observed medication administered with the physician's order. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were used to measure differences between groups of medication-dispensing procedures. Results. Nurses observed 6497 medications being administered to 1374 patients. The overall error rate was 1.2%. The transcription error rates for orders transcribed by an onsite pharmacist were slightly lower than for orders transcribed by a telepharmacy service (0.10% and 0.33%, respectively). Fewer dispensing errors occurred when medications were dispensed by an onsite pharmacist versus any other method of medication acquisition (0.10% versus 0.44%, p = 0.0085). The rates of dispensing errors for medications that were retrieved from a single-cell ADC (0.19%), a multicell ADC (0.45%), or a drug closet or general supply (0.77%) did not differ significantly. BCMA was associated with a higher proportion of dispensing and administration errors intercepted before reaching the patient (66.7%) compared with either manual double checks (10%) or no BCMA or double check (30.4%) of the medication before administration (p = 0.0167). Conclusion. Onsite pharmacist dispensing and BCMA were associated with fewer medication errors and are important components of a medication safety strategy in CAHs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981271705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981271705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2146/ajhp150760

DO - 10.2146/ajhp150760

M3 - Article

C2 - 27440623

AN - SCOPUS:84981271705

VL - 73

SP - 1167

EP - 1173

JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

JF - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

SN - 1079-2082

IS - 15

ER -