Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation: Ray tracing versus simulated keratometry

Glauco Reggiani Mello, Cynthia J. Roberts, David Smadja, Crislaine C. Serpe, Ronald R. Krueger, Marcony R. Santhiago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the changes in corneal power (δK) induced by myopic ablations estimated by Placidodisk and total corneal power (TCP) ray tracing methods to the refractive change (δSE). METHODS: Manifest refraction, simulated keratometry from a Placido-disk based system, and TCP from a dual-Scheimpfl ug analyzer were obtained from 35 patients (58 eyes) before and 3 months after a myopic ablation. The change in the manifest refraction that occurred after surgery was then vertex distance corrected and compared to the changes observed in corneal power with the various systems analyzed. RESULTS: The Placido-based simulated keratometry overestimated the corneal power after the procedure by 0.50 ± 0.53 diopters (D) when compared to refractive change in the corneal plane induced by the laser surgery (ΔSE-ΔK). The ray tracing method showed the opposite trend, with the TCP simulated keratometry showing an underestimation of the corneal power of-0.25 ± 0.48 D. The Placido system showed a direct correlation between the overestimation of the corneal power and the level of myopia, whereas the ray tracing method showed an underestimation, which was more pronounced in higher levels of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing methods underestimate corneal power as opposed to the overestimation in corneal power after refractive surgery, directly related to the level of myopia, observed in Placido-based systems. They have the potential to overcome the errors in calculations based on anterior curvature alone. However, ray tracing methods need to be validated and optimized before it can be used routinely in IOL calculation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-610
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Myopia
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Laser Therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation : Ray tracing versus simulated keratometry. / Mello, Glauco Reggiani; Roberts, Cynthia J.; Smadja, David; Serpe, Crislaine C.; Krueger, Ronald R.; Santhiago, Marcony R.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.09.2013, p. 604-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mello, Glauco Reggiani ; Roberts, Cynthia J. ; Smadja, David ; Serpe, Crislaine C. ; Krueger, Ronald R. ; Santhiago, Marcony R. / Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation : Ray tracing versus simulated keratometry. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 9. pp. 604-610.
@article{3ba2f95d7f0e4a5c9bedd7919cd8f674,
title = "Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation: Ray tracing versus simulated keratometry",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the changes in corneal power (δK) induced by myopic ablations estimated by Placidodisk and total corneal power (TCP) ray tracing methods to the refractive change (δSE). METHODS: Manifest refraction, simulated keratometry from a Placido-disk based system, and TCP from a dual-Scheimpfl ug analyzer were obtained from 35 patients (58 eyes) before and 3 months after a myopic ablation. The change in the manifest refraction that occurred after surgery was then vertex distance corrected and compared to the changes observed in corneal power with the various systems analyzed. RESULTS: The Placido-based simulated keratometry overestimated the corneal power after the procedure by 0.50 ± 0.53 diopters (D) when compared to refractive change in the corneal plane induced by the laser surgery (ΔSE-ΔK). The ray tracing method showed the opposite trend, with the TCP simulated keratometry showing an underestimation of the corneal power of-0.25 ± 0.48 D. The Placido system showed a direct correlation between the overestimation of the corneal power and the level of myopia, whereas the ray tracing method showed an underestimation, which was more pronounced in higher levels of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing methods underestimate corneal power as opposed to the overestimation in corneal power after refractive surgery, directly related to the level of myopia, observed in Placido-based systems. They have the potential to overcome the errors in calculations based on anterior curvature alone. However, ray tracing methods need to be validated and optimized before it can be used routinely in IOL calculation.",
author = "Mello, {Glauco Reggiani} and Roberts, {Cynthia J.} and David Smadja and Serpe, {Crislaine C.} and Krueger, {Ronald R.} and Santhiago, {Marcony R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20130723-03",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "604--610",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation

T2 - Ray tracing versus simulated keratometry

AU - Mello, Glauco Reggiani

AU - Roberts, Cynthia J.

AU - Smadja, David

AU - Serpe, Crislaine C.

AU - Krueger, Ronald R.

AU - Santhiago, Marcony R.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the changes in corneal power (δK) induced by myopic ablations estimated by Placidodisk and total corneal power (TCP) ray tracing methods to the refractive change (δSE). METHODS: Manifest refraction, simulated keratometry from a Placido-disk based system, and TCP from a dual-Scheimpfl ug analyzer were obtained from 35 patients (58 eyes) before and 3 months after a myopic ablation. The change in the manifest refraction that occurred after surgery was then vertex distance corrected and compared to the changes observed in corneal power with the various systems analyzed. RESULTS: The Placido-based simulated keratometry overestimated the corneal power after the procedure by 0.50 ± 0.53 diopters (D) when compared to refractive change in the corneal plane induced by the laser surgery (ΔSE-ΔK). The ray tracing method showed the opposite trend, with the TCP simulated keratometry showing an underestimation of the corneal power of-0.25 ± 0.48 D. The Placido system showed a direct correlation between the overestimation of the corneal power and the level of myopia, whereas the ray tracing method showed an underestimation, which was more pronounced in higher levels of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing methods underestimate corneal power as opposed to the overestimation in corneal power after refractive surgery, directly related to the level of myopia, observed in Placido-based systems. They have the potential to overcome the errors in calculations based on anterior curvature alone. However, ray tracing methods need to be validated and optimized before it can be used routinely in IOL calculation.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the changes in corneal power (δK) induced by myopic ablations estimated by Placidodisk and total corneal power (TCP) ray tracing methods to the refractive change (δSE). METHODS: Manifest refraction, simulated keratometry from a Placido-disk based system, and TCP from a dual-Scheimpfl ug analyzer were obtained from 35 patients (58 eyes) before and 3 months after a myopic ablation. The change in the manifest refraction that occurred after surgery was then vertex distance corrected and compared to the changes observed in corneal power with the various systems analyzed. RESULTS: The Placido-based simulated keratometry overestimated the corneal power after the procedure by 0.50 ± 0.53 diopters (D) when compared to refractive change in the corneal plane induced by the laser surgery (ΔSE-ΔK). The ray tracing method showed the opposite trend, with the TCP simulated keratometry showing an underestimation of the corneal power of-0.25 ± 0.48 D. The Placido system showed a direct correlation between the overestimation of the corneal power and the level of myopia, whereas the ray tracing method showed an underestimation, which was more pronounced in higher levels of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing methods underestimate corneal power as opposed to the overestimation in corneal power after refractive surgery, directly related to the level of myopia, observed in Placido-based systems. They have the potential to overcome the errors in calculations based on anterior curvature alone. However, ray tracing methods need to be validated and optimized before it can be used routinely in IOL calculation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884887334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884887334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20130723-03

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20130723-03

M3 - Article

C2 - 23898948

AN - SCOPUS:84884887334

VL - 29

SP - 604

EP - 610

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 9

ER -