Comparison of gatekeeping and other testing methods for identifying superior drug combinations in bifactorial designs with isotonic parameters

Julia N. Soulakova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper several multiple testing procedures are discussed with respect to the problem of detecting combination drug superiority for a bifactorial design with monotone gains. The testing methods include the generalized maximum test procedure (GMAXP) proposed by Soulakova (2009), and gatekeeping strategies: the general multistage gatekeeping method (GMGP) proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2008a), and the serial Bonferroni gatekeeping method (TREE), proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2007). The GMGP with the truncated Holm and Hochberg components is discussed. In addition, the truncated Sidak-Holm component is proposed, and shortcut alternatives to the GMGP are addressed. It is shown by simulations that the GMAXP achieves higher power if there are relatively many superior combinations, i.e., if the lower combinations are superior, while the gatekeeping methods perform better if there is a single or just a few superior combinations. While in some cases the GMGP with the truncated Sidak-Holm component outperforms the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component, the observed power advantages are not substantial. Thus, the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component is recommended as it can dominate the other methods when the Min test statistics are independent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-649
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Gatekeeping
Drug Combinations
Drugs
Testing
Design
Bonferroni
Multiple Testing
High Power
Test Statistic
Monotone

Keywords

  • Closure principle
  • Familywise error rate
  • Maximum test
  • Multiple testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

@article{0b243591eba442a0ab3bba7b622205d2,
title = "Comparison of gatekeeping and other testing methods for identifying superior drug combinations in bifactorial designs with isotonic parameters",
abstract = "In this paper several multiple testing procedures are discussed with respect to the problem of detecting combination drug superiority for a bifactorial design with monotone gains. The testing methods include the generalized maximum test procedure (GMAXP) proposed by Soulakova (2009), and gatekeeping strategies: the general multistage gatekeeping method (GMGP) proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2008a), and the serial Bonferroni gatekeeping method (TREE), proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2007). The GMGP with the truncated Holm and Hochberg components is discussed. In addition, the truncated Sidak-Holm component is proposed, and shortcut alternatives to the GMGP are addressed. It is shown by simulations that the GMAXP achieves higher power if there are relatively many superior combinations, i.e., if the lower combinations are superior, while the gatekeeping methods perform better if there is a single or just a few superior combinations. While in some cases the GMGP with the truncated Sidak-Holm component outperforms the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component, the observed power advantages are not substantial. Thus, the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component is recommended as it can dominate the other methods when the Min test statistics are independent.",
keywords = "Closure principle, Familywise error rate, Maximum test, Multiple testing",
author = "Soulakova, {Julia N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10543406.2011.551328",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "635--649",
journal = "Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics",
issn = "1054-3406",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of gatekeeping and other testing methods for identifying superior drug combinations in bifactorial designs with isotonic parameters

AU - Soulakova, Julia N.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - In this paper several multiple testing procedures are discussed with respect to the problem of detecting combination drug superiority for a bifactorial design with monotone gains. The testing methods include the generalized maximum test procedure (GMAXP) proposed by Soulakova (2009), and gatekeeping strategies: the general multistage gatekeeping method (GMGP) proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2008a), and the serial Bonferroni gatekeeping method (TREE), proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2007). The GMGP with the truncated Holm and Hochberg components is discussed. In addition, the truncated Sidak-Holm component is proposed, and shortcut alternatives to the GMGP are addressed. It is shown by simulations that the GMAXP achieves higher power if there are relatively many superior combinations, i.e., if the lower combinations are superior, while the gatekeeping methods perform better if there is a single or just a few superior combinations. While in some cases the GMGP with the truncated Sidak-Holm component outperforms the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component, the observed power advantages are not substantial. Thus, the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component is recommended as it can dominate the other methods when the Min test statistics are independent.

AB - In this paper several multiple testing procedures are discussed with respect to the problem of detecting combination drug superiority for a bifactorial design with monotone gains. The testing methods include the generalized maximum test procedure (GMAXP) proposed by Soulakova (2009), and gatekeeping strategies: the general multistage gatekeeping method (GMGP) proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2008a), and the serial Bonferroni gatekeeping method (TREE), proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2007). The GMGP with the truncated Holm and Hochberg components is discussed. In addition, the truncated Sidak-Holm component is proposed, and shortcut alternatives to the GMGP are addressed. It is shown by simulations that the GMAXP achieves higher power if there are relatively many superior combinations, i.e., if the lower combinations are superior, while the gatekeeping methods perform better if there is a single or just a few superior combinations. While in some cases the GMGP with the truncated Sidak-Holm component outperforms the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component, the observed power advantages are not substantial. Thus, the GMGP with the truncated Hochberg component is recommended as it can dominate the other methods when the Min test statistics are independent.

KW - Closure principle

KW - Familywise error rate

KW - Maximum test

KW - Multiple testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957474384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957474384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10543406.2011.551328

DO - 10.1080/10543406.2011.551328

M3 - Article

C2 - 21516561

AN - SCOPUS:79957474384

VL - 21

SP - 635

EP - 649

JO - Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

JF - Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

SN - 1054-3406

IS - 4

ER -