Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites

Jennifer R Keshwani, W. Patrick Dunn, Michael P. Link, Yong Wang, Changqi Xu, Mary P. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently introduced nanohybrid dental composites have promised a smoother surface finish and strength, comparable to that of microhybrid composites. This study compared the mechanical properties and surface finish of nanohybrid and microhybrid composites by measuring the flexural strength and modulus (four-point bend) and surface roughness after polishing (using atomic force microscopy) of six commercial dental composites (three nanohybrid, three microhybrid). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to qualitatively characterize filler morphology and size. The flexural strength and modulus were significantly higher among the microhybrid composites, while the nanohybrid composites exhibited significantly lower surface roughness. SEM characterization revealed differences in filler particle size and shape that could affect the flexural properties and surface roughness. Composites containing spherical filler particles exhibited higher flexural properties and lower roughness values compared to composites with irregular fillers. These results did not support the premise that nanohybrid composites offer similar mechanical properties to microhybrids in addition to a better surface finish.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-347
Number of pages6
JournalGeneral dentistry
Volume59
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Surface Properties
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Tooth
Atomic Force Microscopy
Particle Size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Keshwani, J. R., Dunn, W. P., Link, M. P., Wang, Y., Xu, C., & Walker, M. P. (2011). Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites. General dentistry, 59(5), 342-347.

Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites. / Keshwani, Jennifer R; Dunn, W. Patrick; Link, Michael P.; Wang, Yong; Xu, Changqi; Walker, Mary P.

In: General dentistry, Vol. 59, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 342-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Keshwani, JR, Dunn, WP, Link, MP, Wang, Y, Xu, C & Walker, MP 2011, 'Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites', General dentistry, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 342-347.
Keshwani, Jennifer R ; Dunn, W. Patrick ; Link, Michael P. ; Wang, Yong ; Xu, Changqi ; Walker, Mary P. / Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites. In: General dentistry. 2011 ; Vol. 59, No. 5. pp. 342-347.
@article{324174abfd0e473799873330c5c0b34f,
title = "Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites",
abstract = "Recently introduced nanohybrid dental composites have promised a smoother surface finish and strength, comparable to that of microhybrid composites. This study compared the mechanical properties and surface finish of nanohybrid and microhybrid composites by measuring the flexural strength and modulus (four-point bend) and surface roughness after polishing (using atomic force microscopy) of six commercial dental composites (three nanohybrid, three microhybrid). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to qualitatively characterize filler morphology and size. The flexural strength and modulus were significantly higher among the microhybrid composites, while the nanohybrid composites exhibited significantly lower surface roughness. SEM characterization revealed differences in filler particle size and shape that could affect the flexural properties and surface roughness. Composites containing spherical filler particles exhibited higher flexural properties and lower roughness values compared to composites with irregular fillers. These results did not support the premise that nanohybrid composites offer similar mechanical properties to microhybrids in addition to a better surface finish.",
author = "Keshwani, {Jennifer R} and Dunn, {W. Patrick} and Link, {Michael P.} and Yong Wang and Changqi Xu and Walker, {Mary P.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "342--347",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites

AU - Keshwani, Jennifer R

AU - Dunn, W. Patrick

AU - Link, Michael P.

AU - Wang, Yong

AU - Xu, Changqi

AU - Walker, Mary P.

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Recently introduced nanohybrid dental composites have promised a smoother surface finish and strength, comparable to that of microhybrid composites. This study compared the mechanical properties and surface finish of nanohybrid and microhybrid composites by measuring the flexural strength and modulus (four-point bend) and surface roughness after polishing (using atomic force microscopy) of six commercial dental composites (three nanohybrid, three microhybrid). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to qualitatively characterize filler morphology and size. The flexural strength and modulus were significantly higher among the microhybrid composites, while the nanohybrid composites exhibited significantly lower surface roughness. SEM characterization revealed differences in filler particle size and shape that could affect the flexural properties and surface roughness. Composites containing spherical filler particles exhibited higher flexural properties and lower roughness values compared to composites with irregular fillers. These results did not support the premise that nanohybrid composites offer similar mechanical properties to microhybrids in addition to a better surface finish.

AB - Recently introduced nanohybrid dental composites have promised a smoother surface finish and strength, comparable to that of microhybrid composites. This study compared the mechanical properties and surface finish of nanohybrid and microhybrid composites by measuring the flexural strength and modulus (four-point bend) and surface roughness after polishing (using atomic force microscopy) of six commercial dental composites (three nanohybrid, three microhybrid). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to qualitatively characterize filler morphology and size. The flexural strength and modulus were significantly higher among the microhybrid composites, while the nanohybrid composites exhibited significantly lower surface roughness. SEM characterization revealed differences in filler particle size and shape that could affect the flexural properties and surface roughness. Composites containing spherical filler particles exhibited higher flexural properties and lower roughness values compared to composites with irregular fillers. These results did not support the premise that nanohybrid composites offer similar mechanical properties to microhybrids in addition to a better surface finish.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053374241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053374241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 342

EP - 347

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 5

ER -