Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops

Andrés Viña, Anatoly A Gitelson, Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson, Yi Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

273 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many algorithms have been developed for the remote estimation of biophysical characteristics of vegetation, in terms of combinations of spectral bands, derivatives of reflectance spectra, neural networks, inversion of radiative transfer models, and several multi-spectral statistical approaches. However, the most widespread type of algorithm used is the mathematical combination of visible and near-infrared reflectance bands, in the form of spectral vegetation indices. Applications of such vegetation indices have ranged from leaves to the entire globe, but in many instances, their applicability is specific to species, vegetation types or local conditions. The general objective of this study is to evaluate different vegetation indices for the remote estimation of the green leaf area index (Green LAI) of two crop types (maize and soybean) with contrasting canopy architectures and leaf structures. Among the indices tested, the chlorophyll Indices (the CIGreen, the CIRed-edge and the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index, MTCI) exhibited strong and significant linear relationships with Green LAI, and thus were sensitive across the entire range of Green LAI evaluated (i.e., 0.0 to more than 6.0m2/m2). However, the CIRed-edge was the only index insensitive to crop type and produced the most accurate estimations of Green LAI in both crops (RMSE=0.577m2/m2). These results were obtained using data acquired with close range sensors (i.e., field spectroradiometers mounted 6m above the canopy) and an aircraft-mounted hyperspectral imaging spectroradiometer (AISA). As the CIRed-edge also exhibited low sensitivity to soil background effects, it constitutes a simple, yet robust tool for the remote and synoptic estimation of Green LAI. Algorithms based on this index may not require re-parameterization when applied to crops with different canopy architectures and leaf structures, but further studies are required for assessing its applicability in other vegetation types (e.g., forests, grasslands).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3468-3478
Number of pages11
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume115
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2011

Fingerprint

vegetation index
leaf area index
Crops
crop
spectroradiometers
crops
canopy architecture
canopy
vegetation types
vegetation type
reflectance
Chlorophyll
chlorophyll
leaves
MERIS
aircraft
neural networks
Radiative transfer
sensors (equipment)
radiative transfer

Keywords

  • Chlorophyll indices
  • Green LAI
  • Maize
  • Soybean

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computers in Earth Sciences
  • Soil Science
  • Geology

Cite this

Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops. / Viña, Andrés; Gitelson, Anatoly A; Nguy-Robertson, Anthony L.; Peng, Yi.

In: Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 115, No. 12, 15.12.2011, p. 3468-3478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Viña, Andrés ; Gitelson, Anatoly A ; Nguy-Robertson, Anthony L. ; Peng, Yi. / Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops. In: Remote Sensing of Environment. 2011 ; Vol. 115, No. 12. pp. 3468-3478.
@article{e3bd4d30178240f69bfa0e632d7df637,
title = "Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops",
abstract = "Many algorithms have been developed for the remote estimation of biophysical characteristics of vegetation, in terms of combinations of spectral bands, derivatives of reflectance spectra, neural networks, inversion of radiative transfer models, and several multi-spectral statistical approaches. However, the most widespread type of algorithm used is the mathematical combination of visible and near-infrared reflectance bands, in the form of spectral vegetation indices. Applications of such vegetation indices have ranged from leaves to the entire globe, but in many instances, their applicability is specific to species, vegetation types or local conditions. The general objective of this study is to evaluate different vegetation indices for the remote estimation of the green leaf area index (Green LAI) of two crop types (maize and soybean) with contrasting canopy architectures and leaf structures. Among the indices tested, the chlorophyll Indices (the CIGreen, the CIRed-edge and the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index, MTCI) exhibited strong and significant linear relationships with Green LAI, and thus were sensitive across the entire range of Green LAI evaluated (i.e., 0.0 to more than 6.0m2/m2). However, the CIRed-edge was the only index insensitive to crop type and produced the most accurate estimations of Green LAI in both crops (RMSE=0.577m2/m2). These results were obtained using data acquired with close range sensors (i.e., field spectroradiometers mounted 6m above the canopy) and an aircraft-mounted hyperspectral imaging spectroradiometer (AISA). As the CIRed-edge also exhibited low sensitivity to soil background effects, it constitutes a simple, yet robust tool for the remote and synoptic estimation of Green LAI. Algorithms based on this index may not require re-parameterization when applied to crops with different canopy architectures and leaf structures, but further studies are required for assessing its applicability in other vegetation types (e.g., forests, grasslands).",
keywords = "Chlorophyll indices, Green LAI, Maize, Soybean",
author = "Andr{\'e}s Vi{\~n}a and Gitelson, {Anatoly A} and Nguy-Robertson, {Anthony L.} and Yi Peng",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "3468--3478",
journal = "Remote Sensing of Environment",
issn = "0034-4257",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops

AU - Viña, Andrés

AU - Gitelson, Anatoly A

AU - Nguy-Robertson, Anthony L.

AU - Peng, Yi

PY - 2011/12/15

Y1 - 2011/12/15

N2 - Many algorithms have been developed for the remote estimation of biophysical characteristics of vegetation, in terms of combinations of spectral bands, derivatives of reflectance spectra, neural networks, inversion of radiative transfer models, and several multi-spectral statistical approaches. However, the most widespread type of algorithm used is the mathematical combination of visible and near-infrared reflectance bands, in the form of spectral vegetation indices. Applications of such vegetation indices have ranged from leaves to the entire globe, but in many instances, their applicability is specific to species, vegetation types or local conditions. The general objective of this study is to evaluate different vegetation indices for the remote estimation of the green leaf area index (Green LAI) of two crop types (maize and soybean) with contrasting canopy architectures and leaf structures. Among the indices tested, the chlorophyll Indices (the CIGreen, the CIRed-edge and the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index, MTCI) exhibited strong and significant linear relationships with Green LAI, and thus were sensitive across the entire range of Green LAI evaluated (i.e., 0.0 to more than 6.0m2/m2). However, the CIRed-edge was the only index insensitive to crop type and produced the most accurate estimations of Green LAI in both crops (RMSE=0.577m2/m2). These results were obtained using data acquired with close range sensors (i.e., field spectroradiometers mounted 6m above the canopy) and an aircraft-mounted hyperspectral imaging spectroradiometer (AISA). As the CIRed-edge also exhibited low sensitivity to soil background effects, it constitutes a simple, yet robust tool for the remote and synoptic estimation of Green LAI. Algorithms based on this index may not require re-parameterization when applied to crops with different canopy architectures and leaf structures, but further studies are required for assessing its applicability in other vegetation types (e.g., forests, grasslands).

AB - Many algorithms have been developed for the remote estimation of biophysical characteristics of vegetation, in terms of combinations of spectral bands, derivatives of reflectance spectra, neural networks, inversion of radiative transfer models, and several multi-spectral statistical approaches. However, the most widespread type of algorithm used is the mathematical combination of visible and near-infrared reflectance bands, in the form of spectral vegetation indices. Applications of such vegetation indices have ranged from leaves to the entire globe, but in many instances, their applicability is specific to species, vegetation types or local conditions. The general objective of this study is to evaluate different vegetation indices for the remote estimation of the green leaf area index (Green LAI) of two crop types (maize and soybean) with contrasting canopy architectures and leaf structures. Among the indices tested, the chlorophyll Indices (the CIGreen, the CIRed-edge and the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index, MTCI) exhibited strong and significant linear relationships with Green LAI, and thus were sensitive across the entire range of Green LAI evaluated (i.e., 0.0 to more than 6.0m2/m2). However, the CIRed-edge was the only index insensitive to crop type and produced the most accurate estimations of Green LAI in both crops (RMSE=0.577m2/m2). These results were obtained using data acquired with close range sensors (i.e., field spectroradiometers mounted 6m above the canopy) and an aircraft-mounted hyperspectral imaging spectroradiometer (AISA). As the CIRed-edge also exhibited low sensitivity to soil background effects, it constitutes a simple, yet robust tool for the remote and synoptic estimation of Green LAI. Algorithms based on this index may not require re-parameterization when applied to crops with different canopy architectures and leaf structures, but further studies are required for assessing its applicability in other vegetation types (e.g., forests, grasslands).

KW - Chlorophyll indices

KW - Green LAI

KW - Maize

KW - Soybean

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81355146796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81355146796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 3468

EP - 3478

JO - Remote Sensing of Environment

JF - Remote Sensing of Environment

SN - 0034-4257

IS - 12

ER -