Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles

Brian S.Boxer Wachler, Cathy L. Phillips, David J. Schanzlin, Ronald R. Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual performance of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Methods: Twenty eyes of ten patients were examined. Each patient was fit with Acuvue, Cibasoft, and Biomedics contact lenses in random order. LogMar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the VectorVision CSV- 1000 were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in visual acuity between any contact lenses (P=-.15). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was significantly lower for the Cibasoft lens compared to spectacles (P=-.04). There was no significant difference between spectacles and contact lenses for remaining spatial frequencies (P=.07-.35). Conclusions: Visual acuity appears to be an insensitive method for evaluating soft contact lenses. The lathe-cut manufacturing process may be responsible for reduced visual function compared to cast-molded lenses. Further study in this area is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-51
Number of pages4
JournalCLAO Journal
Volume25
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1999

Fingerprint

Hydrophilic Contact Lens
Contrast Sensitivity
Contact Lenses
Visual Acuity
Lenses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Wachler, B. S. B., Phillips, C. L., Schanzlin, D. J., & Krueger, R. R. (1999). Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles. CLAO Journal, 25(1), 48-51.

Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles. / Wachler, Brian S.Boxer; Phillips, Cathy L.; Schanzlin, David J.; Krueger, Ronald R.

In: CLAO Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 48-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wachler, BSB, Phillips, CL, Schanzlin, DJ & Krueger, RR 1999, 'Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles', CLAO Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 48-51.
Wachler, Brian S.Boxer ; Phillips, Cathy L. ; Schanzlin, David J. ; Krueger, Ronald R. / Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles. In: CLAO Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 48-51.
@article{16e0b1bcb431479892b7ca242ed71349,
title = "Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the visual performance of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Methods: Twenty eyes of ten patients were examined. Each patient was fit with Acuvue, Cibasoft, and Biomedics contact lenses in random order. LogMar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the VectorVision CSV- 1000 were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in visual acuity between any contact lenses (P=-.15). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was significantly lower for the Cibasoft lens compared to spectacles (P=-.04). There was no significant difference between spectacles and contact lenses for remaining spatial frequencies (P=.07-.35). Conclusions: Visual acuity appears to be an insensitive method for evaluating soft contact lenses. The lathe-cut manufacturing process may be responsible for reduced visual function compared to cast-molded lenses. Further study in this area is needed.",
author = "Wachler, {Brian S.Boxer} and Phillips, {Cathy L.} and Schanzlin, {David J.} and Krueger, {Ronald R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "48--51",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lens",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles

AU - Wachler, Brian S.Boxer

AU - Phillips, Cathy L.

AU - Schanzlin, David J.

AU - Krueger, Ronald R.

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the visual performance of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Methods: Twenty eyes of ten patients were examined. Each patient was fit with Acuvue, Cibasoft, and Biomedics contact lenses in random order. LogMar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the VectorVision CSV- 1000 were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in visual acuity between any contact lenses (P=-.15). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was significantly lower for the Cibasoft lens compared to spectacles (P=-.04). There was no significant difference between spectacles and contact lenses for remaining spatial frequencies (P=.07-.35). Conclusions: Visual acuity appears to be an insensitive method for evaluating soft contact lenses. The lathe-cut manufacturing process may be responsible for reduced visual function compared to cast-molded lenses. Further study in this area is needed.

AB - Purpose: To compare the visual performance of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Methods: Twenty eyes of ten patients were examined. Each patient was fit with Acuvue, Cibasoft, and Biomedics contact lenses in random order. LogMar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the VectorVision CSV- 1000 were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in visual acuity between any contact lenses (P=-.15). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was significantly lower for the Cibasoft lens compared to spectacles (P=-.04). There was no significant difference between spectacles and contact lenses for remaining spatial frequencies (P=.07-.35). Conclusions: Visual acuity appears to be an insensitive method for evaluating soft contact lenses. The lathe-cut manufacturing process may be responsible for reduced visual function compared to cast-molded lenses. Further study in this area is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002635070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002635070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10073637

AN - SCOPUS:0002635070

VL - 25

SP - 48

EP - 51

JO - Eye and Contact Lens

JF - Eye and Contact Lens

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 1

ER -