Comparison between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode

Akimasa Tsujimoto, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Toshiki Takamizawa, Hidehiko Watanabe, William W. Johnson, Mark A. Latta, Masashi Miyazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

This aim of this study was to compare universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Three universal adhesives – Clearfil Universal, G-Premio Bond, and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive – and three-two-step self-etch adhesives – Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil SE Bond 2, and OptiBond XTR – were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of resin composite bonded to adhesive on dentin in self-etch mode were determined. Scanning electron microscopy observations of fracture surfaces after bond strength tests were also made. The initial shear bond strength of universal adhesives was material dependent, unlike that of two-step self-etch adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive was not significantly different from that of two-step self-etch adhesives, unlike the other universal adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives differed depending on the type of adhesive, unlike those of two-step self-etch adhesives. The results of this study encourage the continued use of two-step self-etch adhesive over some universal adhesives but suggest that changes to the composition of universal adhesives may lead to a dentin bond fatigue durability similar to that of two-step self-etch adhesives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-222
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • bond fatigue durability
  • dentin
  • self-etch mode
  • two-step self-etch adhesive
  • universal adhesive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this