Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: A simulation study

Leila Towhidi, Delaram Khodadadi, Nataly Maimari, Ryan M. Pedrigi, Henry Ip, Zoltan Kis, Brenda R. Kwak, Tatiana W. Petrova, Mauro Delorenzi, Rob Krams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The discovery of the human genome has unveiled new fields of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, which has produced paradigm shifts on how to study disease mechanisms, wherein a current central focus is the understanding of how gene signatures and gene networks interact within cells. These gene function studies require manipulating genes either through activation or inhibition, which can be achieved by temporarily permeabilizing the cell membrane through transfection to deliver cDNA or RNAi. An efficient transfection technique is electroporation, which applies an optimized electric pulse to permeabilize the cells of interest. When the molecules are applied on top of seeded cells, it is called "direct" transfection and when the nucleic acids are printed on the substrate and the cells are seeded on top of them, it is termed "reverse" transfection. Direct transfection has been successfully applied in previous studies, whereas reverse transfection has recently gained more attention in the context of high-throughput experiments. Despite the emerging importance, studies comparing the efficiency of the two methods are lacking. In this study, a model for electroporation of cells in situ is developed to address this deficiency. The results indicate that reverse transfection is less efficient than direct transfection. However, the model also predicts that by increasing the concentration of deliverable molecules by a factor of 2 or increasing the applied voltage by 20%, reverse transfection can be approximately as efficient as direct transfection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalPhysiological Reports
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Electroporation
Transfection
Genes
Gene Regulatory Networks
Human Genome
Genomics
RNA Interference
Proteomics
Nucleic Acids
Complementary DNA
Cell Membrane

Keywords

  • Electroporation
  • High-throughput techniques
  • Transfection efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ : A simulation study. / Towhidi, Leila; Khodadadi, Delaram; Maimari, Nataly; Pedrigi, Ryan M.; Ip, Henry; Kis, Zoltan; Kwak, Brenda R.; Petrova, Tatiana W.; Delorenzi, Mauro; Krams, Rob.

In: Physiological Reports, Vol. 4, No. 6, 01.03.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Towhidi, L, Khodadadi, D, Maimari, N, Pedrigi, RM, Ip, H, Kis, Z, Kwak, BR, Petrova, TW, Delorenzi, M & Krams, R 2016, 'Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: A simulation study', Physiological Reports, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12673
Towhidi, Leila ; Khodadadi, Delaram ; Maimari, Nataly ; Pedrigi, Ryan M. ; Ip, Henry ; Kis, Zoltan ; Kwak, Brenda R. ; Petrova, Tatiana W. ; Delorenzi, Mauro ; Krams, Rob. / Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ : A simulation study. In: Physiological Reports. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 6. pp. 1-14.
@article{3299a7aabfba49409b56a3ea03ec307e,
title = "Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: A simulation study",
abstract = "The discovery of the human genome has unveiled new fields of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, which has produced paradigm shifts on how to study disease mechanisms, wherein a current central focus is the understanding of how gene signatures and gene networks interact within cells. These gene function studies require manipulating genes either through activation or inhibition, which can be achieved by temporarily permeabilizing the cell membrane through transfection to deliver cDNA or RNAi. An efficient transfection technique is electroporation, which applies an optimized electric pulse to permeabilize the cells of interest. When the molecules are applied on top of seeded cells, it is called {"}direct{"} transfection and when the nucleic acids are printed on the substrate and the cells are seeded on top of them, it is termed {"}reverse{"} transfection. Direct transfection has been successfully applied in previous studies, whereas reverse transfection has recently gained more attention in the context of high-throughput experiments. Despite the emerging importance, studies comparing the efficiency of the two methods are lacking. In this study, a model for electroporation of cells in situ is developed to address this deficiency. The results indicate that reverse transfection is less efficient than direct transfection. However, the model also predicts that by increasing the concentration of deliverable molecules by a factor of 2 or increasing the applied voltage by 20{\%}, reverse transfection can be approximately as efficient as direct transfection.",
keywords = "Electroporation, High-throughput techniques, Transfection efficiency",
author = "Leila Towhidi and Delaram Khodadadi and Nataly Maimari and Pedrigi, {Ryan M.} and Henry Ip and Zoltan Kis and Kwak, {Brenda R.} and Petrova, {Tatiana W.} and Mauro Delorenzi and Rob Krams",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14814/phy2.12673",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Physiological Reports",
issn = "2051-817X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ

T2 - A simulation study

AU - Towhidi, Leila

AU - Khodadadi, Delaram

AU - Maimari, Nataly

AU - Pedrigi, Ryan M.

AU - Ip, Henry

AU - Kis, Zoltan

AU - Kwak, Brenda R.

AU - Petrova, Tatiana W.

AU - Delorenzi, Mauro

AU - Krams, Rob

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The discovery of the human genome has unveiled new fields of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, which has produced paradigm shifts on how to study disease mechanisms, wherein a current central focus is the understanding of how gene signatures and gene networks interact within cells. These gene function studies require manipulating genes either through activation or inhibition, which can be achieved by temporarily permeabilizing the cell membrane through transfection to deliver cDNA or RNAi. An efficient transfection technique is electroporation, which applies an optimized electric pulse to permeabilize the cells of interest. When the molecules are applied on top of seeded cells, it is called "direct" transfection and when the nucleic acids are printed on the substrate and the cells are seeded on top of them, it is termed "reverse" transfection. Direct transfection has been successfully applied in previous studies, whereas reverse transfection has recently gained more attention in the context of high-throughput experiments. Despite the emerging importance, studies comparing the efficiency of the two methods are lacking. In this study, a model for electroporation of cells in situ is developed to address this deficiency. The results indicate that reverse transfection is less efficient than direct transfection. However, the model also predicts that by increasing the concentration of deliverable molecules by a factor of 2 or increasing the applied voltage by 20%, reverse transfection can be approximately as efficient as direct transfection.

AB - The discovery of the human genome has unveiled new fields of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, which has produced paradigm shifts on how to study disease mechanisms, wherein a current central focus is the understanding of how gene signatures and gene networks interact within cells. These gene function studies require manipulating genes either through activation or inhibition, which can be achieved by temporarily permeabilizing the cell membrane through transfection to deliver cDNA or RNAi. An efficient transfection technique is electroporation, which applies an optimized electric pulse to permeabilize the cells of interest. When the molecules are applied on top of seeded cells, it is called "direct" transfection and when the nucleic acids are printed on the substrate and the cells are seeded on top of them, it is termed "reverse" transfection. Direct transfection has been successfully applied in previous studies, whereas reverse transfection has recently gained more attention in the context of high-throughput experiments. Despite the emerging importance, studies comparing the efficiency of the two methods are lacking. In this study, a model for electroporation of cells in situ is developed to address this deficiency. The results indicate that reverse transfection is less efficient than direct transfection. However, the model also predicts that by increasing the concentration of deliverable molecules by a factor of 2 or increasing the applied voltage by 20%, reverse transfection can be approximately as efficient as direct transfection.

KW - Electroporation

KW - High-throughput techniques

KW - Transfection efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962103773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962103773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14814/phy2.12673

DO - 10.14814/phy2.12673

M3 - Article

C2 - 27009275

AN - SCOPUS:84962103773

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Physiological Reports

JF - Physiological Reports

SN - 2051-817X

IS - 6

ER -