Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements

Soohyok Im, Hoki Ban, Yong-Rak Kim, Seong Wan Park

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The new design guide, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), is an improved methodology for pavement design and the evaluation of paving materials. However, in spite of significant advancements to pre-existing traditional design methods, the MEPDG is known to be limited in its accurate prediction of mechanical responses and damage in asphaltic pavements due to the use of the axisymmetric layered elastic theory for pavement structural analyses, simplified constitutive relations and damage characteristics for the paving materials model, and the use of circular tire loading configurations. To model pavement performance in a more realistic manner, this study attempts finite element modeling to account for three-dimensional pavement structure, viscoelastic paving materials, and actual tire loading configurations. Mechanical responses between the finite element simulations and the MEPDG analyses are compared to monitor any significant differences that should be considered to achieve better pavement analysis and design. Pavement performance and corresponding design life between the two approaches are further compared and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012
Pages704-709
Number of pages6
StatePublished - Oct 19 2012
Event2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012 - Hokkaido, Japan
Duration: Sep 10 2012Sep 12 2012

Publication series

NameAdvances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012

Other

Other2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012
CountryJapan
CityHokkaido
Period9/10/129/12/12

Fingerprint

Asphalt pavements
asphalt
pavement
Pavements
damages
performance
tire
simulation
Tires
methodology
evaluation
comparison
damage
design method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Transportation

Cite this

Im, S., Ban, H., Kim, Y-R., & Park, S. W. (2012). Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012 (pp. 704-709). (Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012).

Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements. / Im, Soohyok; Ban, Hoki; Kim, Yong-Rak; Park, Seong Wan.

Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012. 2012. p. 704-709 (Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Im, S, Ban, H, Kim, Y-R & Park, SW 2012, Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements. in Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012. Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012, pp. 704-709, 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012, Hokkaido, Japan, 9/10/12.
Im S, Ban H, Kim Y-R, Park SW. Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012. 2012. p. 704-709. (Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012).
Im, Soohyok ; Ban, Hoki ; Kim, Yong-Rak ; Park, Seong Wan. / Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements. Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012. 2012. pp. 704-709 (Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012).
@inproceedings{d0912a65c82b4dec928e1d5179b47c87,
title = "Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements",
abstract = "The new design guide, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), is an improved methodology for pavement design and the evaluation of paving materials. However, in spite of significant advancements to pre-existing traditional design methods, the MEPDG is known to be limited in its accurate prediction of mechanical responses and damage in asphaltic pavements due to the use of the axisymmetric layered elastic theory for pavement structural analyses, simplified constitutive relations and damage characteristics for the paving materials model, and the use of circular tire loading configurations. To model pavement performance in a more realistic manner, this study attempts finite element modeling to account for three-dimensional pavement structure, viscoelastic paving materials, and actual tire loading configurations. Mechanical responses between the finite element simulations and the MEPDG analyses are compared to monitor any significant differences that should be considered to achieve better pavement analysis and design. Pavement performance and corresponding design life between the two approaches are further compared and discussed.",
author = "Soohyok Im and Hoki Ban and Yong-Rak Kim and Park, {Seong Wan}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "19",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780415621359",
series = "Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012",
pages = "704--709",
booktitle = "Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison between a 3-D finite element pavement model and the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for asphalt pavements

AU - Im, Soohyok

AU - Ban, Hoki

AU - Kim, Yong-Rak

AU - Park, Seong Wan

PY - 2012/10/19

Y1 - 2012/10/19

N2 - The new design guide, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), is an improved methodology for pavement design and the evaluation of paving materials. However, in spite of significant advancements to pre-existing traditional design methods, the MEPDG is known to be limited in its accurate prediction of mechanical responses and damage in asphaltic pavements due to the use of the axisymmetric layered elastic theory for pavement structural analyses, simplified constitutive relations and damage characteristics for the paving materials model, and the use of circular tire loading configurations. To model pavement performance in a more realistic manner, this study attempts finite element modeling to account for three-dimensional pavement structure, viscoelastic paving materials, and actual tire loading configurations. Mechanical responses between the finite element simulations and the MEPDG analyses are compared to monitor any significant differences that should be considered to achieve better pavement analysis and design. Pavement performance and corresponding design life between the two approaches are further compared and discussed.

AB - The new design guide, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), is an improved methodology for pavement design and the evaluation of paving materials. However, in spite of significant advancements to pre-existing traditional design methods, the MEPDG is known to be limited in its accurate prediction of mechanical responses and damage in asphaltic pavements due to the use of the axisymmetric layered elastic theory for pavement structural analyses, simplified constitutive relations and damage characteristics for the paving materials model, and the use of circular tire loading configurations. To model pavement performance in a more realistic manner, this study attempts finite element modeling to account for three-dimensional pavement structure, viscoelastic paving materials, and actual tire loading configurations. Mechanical responses between the finite element simulations and the MEPDG analyses are compared to monitor any significant differences that should be considered to achieve better pavement analysis and design. Pavement performance and corresponding design life between the two approaches are further compared and discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867465532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867465532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780415621359

T3 - Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012

SP - 704

EP - 709

BT - Advances in Transportation Geotechnics II - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics, ICTG 2012

ER -