Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients

B. Joel Tjarks, Jason C. Dorman, Verle D. Valentine, Thayne Munce, Paul A. Thompson, Shanna L. Kindt, Michael F. Bergeron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. Purpose To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT® composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. Methods Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT® composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). Results KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86 ± 11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: - 5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: - 2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: - 2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001) and lower VMS (r = - 0.70; P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-153
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume334
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Post-Concussion Syndrome
Reaction Time
Research

Keywords

  • Diffuse axonal injury
  • Neuropsychological tests
  • Oculomotor dysfunction
  • Post-concussion syndrome
  • Return to play
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Visual-motor deficits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Tjarks, B. J., Dorman, J. C., Valentine, V. D., Munce, T., Thompson, P. A., Kindt, S. L., & Bergeron, M. F. (2013). Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 334(1-2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015

Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients. / Tjarks, B. Joel; Dorman, Jason C.; Valentine, Verle D.; Munce, Thayne; Thompson, Paul A.; Kindt, Shanna L.; Bergeron, Michael F.

In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Vol. 334, No. 1-2, 15.11.2013, p. 148-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tjarks, B. Joel ; Dorman, Jason C. ; Valentine, Verle D. ; Munce, Thayne ; Thompson, Paul A. ; Kindt, Shanna L. ; Bergeron, Michael F. / Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients. In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 334, No. 1-2. pp. 148-153.
@article{bea0c1789b3f4acf9e9e235c8c5ad75b,
title = "Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT{\circledR} composite scores in adolescent concussion patients",
abstract = "The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. Purpose To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT{\circledR} composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. Methods Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT{\circledR} composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). Results KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86 ± 11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: - 5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: - 2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: - 2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001) and lower VMS (r = - 0.70; P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.",
keywords = "Diffuse axonal injury, Neuropsychological tests, Oculomotor dysfunction, Post-concussion syndrome, Return to play, Traumatic brain injury, Visual-motor deficits",
author = "Tjarks, {B. Joel} and Dorman, {Jason C.} and Valentine, {Verle D.} and Thayne Munce and Thompson, {Paul A.} and Kindt, {Shanna L.} and Bergeron, {Michael F.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "334",
pages = "148--153",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients

AU - Tjarks, B. Joel

AU - Dorman, Jason C.

AU - Valentine, Verle D.

AU - Munce, Thayne

AU - Thompson, Paul A.

AU - Kindt, Shanna L.

AU - Bergeron, Michael F.

PY - 2013/11/15

Y1 - 2013/11/15

N2 - The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. Purpose To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT® composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. Methods Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT® composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). Results KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86 ± 11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: - 5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: - 2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: - 2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001) and lower VMS (r = - 0.70; P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.

AB - The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. Purpose To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT® composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. Methods Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT® composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). Results KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86 ± 11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: - 5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: - 2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: - 2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001) and lower VMS (r = - 0.70; P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.

KW - Diffuse axonal injury

KW - Neuropsychological tests

KW - Oculomotor dysfunction

KW - Post-concussion syndrome

KW - Return to play

KW - Traumatic brain injury

KW - Visual-motor deficits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887438006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887438006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015

M3 - Article

VL - 334

SP - 148

EP - 153

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

IS - 1-2

ER -