Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure

Kathy Coufal, Douglas Parham, Melissa Jakubowitz, Cassandra Howell, Jared Reyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s (ASHA’s) National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS) Functional Communication Measure (FCM) as a common metric, this investigation compared traditional service delivery and telepractice service delivery for children receiving therapy for the NOMS diagnostic category of “speech sound production.” Method: De-identified cases were secured from ASHA’s NOMS database and a proprietary database from a private e-learning provider. Cases were included if they met 3 criteria: (a) children received treatment exclusively for speech sound production, (b) they were between 6.0 and 9.5 years old, and (c) they received therapy lasting between 4 and 9 months. A total of 1,331 ASHA NOMS cases and 428 telepractice cases were included. The 2 groups were matched by initial FCM scores. Mann–Whitney U tests were completed to compare differences in the median change scores (the difference between the initial and final FCM scores) between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the median change scores between the traditional group and the telepractice group. Conclusions: These results suggest comparable treatment outcomes between traditional service delivery and telepractice for treatment of children exhibiting speech sound disorders. The findings provide support for the use of telepractice for school-age children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-90
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of speech-language pathology
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Phonetics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Communication
Databases
communication
Therapeutics
Group
language
Research Design
Learning
electronic learning
diagnostic
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure. / Coufal, Kathy; Parham, Douglas; Jakubowitz, Melissa; Howell, Cassandra; Reyes, Jared.

In: American journal of speech-language pathology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 02.2018, p. 82-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coufal, Kathy ; Parham, Douglas ; Jakubowitz, Melissa ; Howell, Cassandra ; Reyes, Jared. / Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure. In: American journal of speech-language pathology. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 82-90.
@article{c116fb7be55343aeb7299d3d7156937d,
title = "Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure",
abstract = "Purpose: Using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s (ASHA’s) National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS) Functional Communication Measure (FCM) as a common metric, this investigation compared traditional service delivery and telepractice service delivery for children receiving therapy for the NOMS diagnostic category of “speech sound production.” Method: De-identified cases were secured from ASHA’s NOMS database and a proprietary database from a private e-learning provider. Cases were included if they met 3 criteria: (a) children received treatment exclusively for speech sound production, (b) they were between 6.0 and 9.5 years old, and (c) they received therapy lasting between 4 and 9 months. A total of 1,331 ASHA NOMS cases and 428 telepractice cases were included. The 2 groups were matched by initial FCM scores. Mann–Whitney U tests were completed to compare differences in the median change scores (the difference between the initial and final FCM scores) between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the median change scores between the traditional group and the telepractice group. Conclusions: These results suggest comparable treatment outcomes between traditional service delivery and telepractice for treatment of children exhibiting speech sound disorders. The findings provide support for the use of telepractice for school-age children.",
author = "Kathy Coufal and Douglas Parham and Melissa Jakubowitz and Cassandra Howell and Jared Reyes",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0070",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "82--90",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure

AU - Coufal, Kathy

AU - Parham, Douglas

AU - Jakubowitz, Melissa

AU - Howell, Cassandra

AU - Reyes, Jared

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Purpose: Using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s (ASHA’s) National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS) Functional Communication Measure (FCM) as a common metric, this investigation compared traditional service delivery and telepractice service delivery for children receiving therapy for the NOMS diagnostic category of “speech sound production.” Method: De-identified cases were secured from ASHA’s NOMS database and a proprietary database from a private e-learning provider. Cases were included if they met 3 criteria: (a) children received treatment exclusively for speech sound production, (b) they were between 6.0 and 9.5 years old, and (c) they received therapy lasting between 4 and 9 months. A total of 1,331 ASHA NOMS cases and 428 telepractice cases were included. The 2 groups were matched by initial FCM scores. Mann–Whitney U tests were completed to compare differences in the median change scores (the difference between the initial and final FCM scores) between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the median change scores between the traditional group and the telepractice group. Conclusions: These results suggest comparable treatment outcomes between traditional service delivery and telepractice for treatment of children exhibiting speech sound disorders. The findings provide support for the use of telepractice for school-age children.

AB - Purpose: Using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s (ASHA’s) National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS) Functional Communication Measure (FCM) as a common metric, this investigation compared traditional service delivery and telepractice service delivery for children receiving therapy for the NOMS diagnostic category of “speech sound production.” Method: De-identified cases were secured from ASHA’s NOMS database and a proprietary database from a private e-learning provider. Cases were included if they met 3 criteria: (a) children received treatment exclusively for speech sound production, (b) they were between 6.0 and 9.5 years old, and (c) they received therapy lasting between 4 and 9 months. A total of 1,331 ASHA NOMS cases and 428 telepractice cases were included. The 2 groups were matched by initial FCM scores. Mann–Whitney U tests were completed to compare differences in the median change scores (the difference between the initial and final FCM scores) between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the median change scores between the traditional group and the telepractice group. Conclusions: These results suggest comparable treatment outcomes between traditional service delivery and telepractice for treatment of children exhibiting speech sound disorders. The findings provide support for the use of telepractice for school-age children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041385763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041385763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0070

DO - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0070

M3 - Article

C2 - 29188278

AN - SCOPUS:85041385763

VL - 27

SP - 82

EP - 90

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 1

ER -