Comparing the reliability of voluntary and evoked muscle actions

Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins, Ty B. Palmer, Joel T. Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study was to quantify the test-retest reliability, intertrial variability and correlations between variables calculated during voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Methods: During three separate trials of isometric leg extension muscle actions with 14 men [mean age (±SD) = 21·9 (±3·2) years; height = 179·2 (±8·0) cm; mass = 77·7 (±10·9) kg], peak torque (PTV), time to peak torque (TPTV), rate of torque development (RTDV), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDV), electromechanical delay (EMDV) and EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) were quantified for voluntary muscle actions. Peak twitch torque (PTE), time to peak twitch torque (TPTE), rate of torque development (RTDE), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDE), electromechanical delay (EMDE), peak-to-peak M-wave (Mp-p) and M-wave area (Marea) were calculated for evoked twitches. All electromyographic measurements were recorded over the vastus lateralis. Results: Voluntary intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0·84-0·96, except for TRTDV (0·30) and EMDV (0·74). Evoked ICC were 0·80-0·95, except for EMDE (0·52). Relative standard errors of measurement for TPT and TRTD were greater for voluntary than evoked, whereas the value for PTE was greater than PTV. There were low to moderate correlations (r = -0·41-0·51) between common voluntary and evoked variables. Conclusions: Evoked variables showed lower intertrial variability than voluntary. Overall, voluntary and evoked muscle actions provide unique, complimentary information regarding neuromuscular function that cannot be used interchangeably.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-441
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Torque
Skeletal Muscle
Quadriceps Muscle
Reproducibility of Results
Leg
Muscles

Keywords

  • Electrical stimulation
  • Isometric muscle actions
  • Minimum difference
  • Neuromuscular testing
  • Test-retest reliability
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparing the reliability of voluntary and evoked muscle actions. / Jenkins, Nathaniel D.M.; Palmer, Ty B.; Cramer, Joel T.

In: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 434-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jenkins, Nathaniel D.M. ; Palmer, Ty B. ; Cramer, Joel T. / Comparing the reliability of voluntary and evoked muscle actions. In: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 6. pp. 434-441.
@article{8ff751f65bdd4f3ea056ff7808cf397c,
title = "Comparing the reliability of voluntary and evoked muscle actions",
abstract = "Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study was to quantify the test-retest reliability, intertrial variability and correlations between variables calculated during voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Methods: During three separate trials of isometric leg extension muscle actions with 14 men [mean age (±SD) = 21·9 (±3·2) years; height = 179·2 (±8·0) cm; mass = 77·7 (±10·9) kg], peak torque (PTV), time to peak torque (TPTV), rate of torque development (RTDV), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDV), electromechanical delay (EMDV) and EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) were quantified for voluntary muscle actions. Peak twitch torque (PTE), time to peak twitch torque (TPTE), rate of torque development (RTDE), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDE), electromechanical delay (EMDE), peak-to-peak M-wave (Mp-p) and M-wave area (Marea) were calculated for evoked twitches. All electromyographic measurements were recorded over the vastus lateralis. Results: Voluntary intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0·84-0·96, except for TRTDV (0·30) and EMDV (0·74). Evoked ICC were 0·80-0·95, except for EMDE (0·52). Relative standard errors of measurement for TPT and TRTD were greater for voluntary than evoked, whereas the value for PTE was greater than PTV. There were low to moderate correlations (r = -0·41-0·51) between common voluntary and evoked variables. Conclusions: Evoked variables showed lower intertrial variability than voluntary. Overall, voluntary and evoked muscle actions provide unique, complimentary information regarding neuromuscular function that cannot be used interchangeably.",
keywords = "Electrical stimulation, Isometric muscle actions, Minimum difference, Neuromuscular testing, Test-retest reliability, Variability",
author = "Jenkins, {Nathaniel D.M.} and Palmer, {Ty B.} and Cramer, {Joel T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cpf.12113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "434--441",
journal = "Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging",
issn = "1475-0961",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the reliability of voluntary and evoked muscle actions

AU - Jenkins, Nathaniel D.M.

AU - Palmer, Ty B.

AU - Cramer, Joel T.

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study was to quantify the test-retest reliability, intertrial variability and correlations between variables calculated during voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Methods: During three separate trials of isometric leg extension muscle actions with 14 men [mean age (±SD) = 21·9 (±3·2) years; height = 179·2 (±8·0) cm; mass = 77·7 (±10·9) kg], peak torque (PTV), time to peak torque (TPTV), rate of torque development (RTDV), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDV), electromechanical delay (EMDV) and EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) were quantified for voluntary muscle actions. Peak twitch torque (PTE), time to peak twitch torque (TPTE), rate of torque development (RTDE), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDE), electromechanical delay (EMDE), peak-to-peak M-wave (Mp-p) and M-wave area (Marea) were calculated for evoked twitches. All electromyographic measurements were recorded over the vastus lateralis. Results: Voluntary intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0·84-0·96, except for TRTDV (0·30) and EMDV (0·74). Evoked ICC were 0·80-0·95, except for EMDE (0·52). Relative standard errors of measurement for TPT and TRTD were greater for voluntary than evoked, whereas the value for PTE was greater than PTV. There were low to moderate correlations (r = -0·41-0·51) between common voluntary and evoked variables. Conclusions: Evoked variables showed lower intertrial variability than voluntary. Overall, voluntary and evoked muscle actions provide unique, complimentary information regarding neuromuscular function that cannot be used interchangeably.

AB - Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study was to quantify the test-retest reliability, intertrial variability and correlations between variables calculated during voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Methods: During three separate trials of isometric leg extension muscle actions with 14 men [mean age (±SD) = 21·9 (±3·2) years; height = 179·2 (±8·0) cm; mass = 77·7 (±10·9) kg], peak torque (PTV), time to peak torque (TPTV), rate of torque development (RTDV), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDV), electromechanical delay (EMDV) and EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) were quantified for voluntary muscle actions. Peak twitch torque (PTE), time to peak twitch torque (TPTE), rate of torque development (RTDE), time to peak rate of torque development (TRTDE), electromechanical delay (EMDE), peak-to-peak M-wave (Mp-p) and M-wave area (Marea) were calculated for evoked twitches. All electromyographic measurements were recorded over the vastus lateralis. Results: Voluntary intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0·84-0·96, except for TRTDV (0·30) and EMDV (0·74). Evoked ICC were 0·80-0·95, except for EMDE (0·52). Relative standard errors of measurement for TPT and TRTD were greater for voluntary than evoked, whereas the value for PTE was greater than PTV. There were low to moderate correlations (r = -0·41-0·51) between common voluntary and evoked variables. Conclusions: Evoked variables showed lower intertrial variability than voluntary. Overall, voluntary and evoked muscle actions provide unique, complimentary information regarding neuromuscular function that cannot be used interchangeably.

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Isometric muscle actions

KW - Minimum difference

KW - Neuromuscular testing

KW - Test-retest reliability

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907954396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907954396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cpf.12113

DO - 10.1111/cpf.12113

M3 - Article

C2 - 24299239

AN - SCOPUS:84907954396

VL - 34

SP - 434

EP - 441

JO - Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

JF - Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

SN - 1475-0961

IS - 6

ER -