Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial

Billie Bonevski, Laura Twyman, Chris Paul, Catherine D'Este, Robert West, Mohammad Siahpush, Christopher Oldmeadow, Kerrin Palazzi, Jamie Bryant, Ashleigh Guillaumier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics associated with consent to participate in a smoking cessation trial for socially disadvantaged smokers. Design: Baseline data were collected prior to seeking consent for the Call it Quits, a randomised controlled trial. Setting: An Australian social and community service organisation. Sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics were compared between smokers who agreed or declined to participate. Participants: Of the 584 smokers invited to participate, 431 (74%) consented and 153 (26%) declined. Results: Logistic regression modelling indicates the ORs of participation were twice as high for those reporting 'high' motivation to quit compared to the 'moderate' motivation group, and five times higher than the 'low' motivation group ( p=0.007). The ORs of consenting were higher for those with a preference for gradual reduction in cigarettes in quit attempts compared with 'no preference'. The ORs were lower for those reporting 'don't know' regarding their enjoyment of smoking compared to 'not at all' enjoying smoking, and reporting that fewer of their family or friends smoked compared to 'most or all'. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the characteristics of socially disadvantaged smokers who consent or decline to participate in a smoking cessation trial. Low-income smokers who are motivated to quit, are not enjoying smoking, had family or friends who smoked, and who are interested in gradual cessation approaches may be more likely to participate in a smoking cessation trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere008419
JournalBMJ Open
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Smoking Cessation
Smoking
Motivation
Social Welfare
Social Work
Tobacco Products
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial. / Bonevski, Billie; Twyman, Laura; Paul, Chris; D'Este, Catherine; West, Robert; Siahpush, Mohammad; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Palazzi, Kerrin; Bryant, Jamie; Guillaumier, Ashleigh.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 9, e008419, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bonevski, B, Twyman, L, Paul, C, D'Este, C, West, R, Siahpush, M, Oldmeadow, C, Palazzi, K, Bryant, J & Guillaumier, A 2015, 'Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial', BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 9, e008419. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419
Bonevski, Billie ; Twyman, Laura ; Paul, Chris ; D'Este, Catherine ; West, Robert ; Siahpush, Mohammad ; Oldmeadow, Christopher ; Palazzi, Kerrin ; Bryant, Jamie ; Guillaumier, Ashleigh. / Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial. In: BMJ Open. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 9.
@article{8820ba0bc5f04b6682ae5a19f9d8726b,
title = "Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial",
abstract = "Objectives: This study examined sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics associated with consent to participate in a smoking cessation trial for socially disadvantaged smokers. Design: Baseline data were collected prior to seeking consent for the Call it Quits, a randomised controlled trial. Setting: An Australian social and community service organisation. Sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics were compared between smokers who agreed or declined to participate. Participants: Of the 584 smokers invited to participate, 431 (74{\%}) consented and 153 (26{\%}) declined. Results: Logistic regression modelling indicates the ORs of participation were twice as high for those reporting 'high' motivation to quit compared to the 'moderate' motivation group, and five times higher than the 'low' motivation group ( p=0.007). The ORs of consenting were higher for those with a preference for gradual reduction in cigarettes in quit attempts compared with 'no preference'. The ORs were lower for those reporting 'don't know' regarding their enjoyment of smoking compared to 'not at all' enjoying smoking, and reporting that fewer of their family or friends smoked compared to 'most or all'. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the characteristics of socially disadvantaged smokers who consent or decline to participate in a smoking cessation trial. Low-income smokers who are motivated to quit, are not enjoying smoking, had family or friends who smoked, and who are interested in gradual cessation approaches may be more likely to participate in a smoking cessation trial.",
author = "Billie Bonevski and Laura Twyman and Chris Paul and Catherine D'Este and Robert West and Mohammad Siahpush and Christopher Oldmeadow and Kerrin Palazzi and Jamie Bryant and Ashleigh Guillaumier",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial

AU - Bonevski, Billie

AU - Twyman, Laura

AU - Paul, Chris

AU - D'Este, Catherine

AU - West, Robert

AU - Siahpush, Mohammad

AU - Oldmeadow, Christopher

AU - Palazzi, Kerrin

AU - Bryant, Jamie

AU - Guillaumier, Ashleigh

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives: This study examined sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics associated with consent to participate in a smoking cessation trial for socially disadvantaged smokers. Design: Baseline data were collected prior to seeking consent for the Call it Quits, a randomised controlled trial. Setting: An Australian social and community service organisation. Sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics were compared between smokers who agreed or declined to participate. Participants: Of the 584 smokers invited to participate, 431 (74%) consented and 153 (26%) declined. Results: Logistic regression modelling indicates the ORs of participation were twice as high for those reporting 'high' motivation to quit compared to the 'moderate' motivation group, and five times higher than the 'low' motivation group ( p=0.007). The ORs of consenting were higher for those with a preference for gradual reduction in cigarettes in quit attempts compared with 'no preference'. The ORs were lower for those reporting 'don't know' regarding their enjoyment of smoking compared to 'not at all' enjoying smoking, and reporting that fewer of their family or friends smoked compared to 'most or all'. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the characteristics of socially disadvantaged smokers who consent or decline to participate in a smoking cessation trial. Low-income smokers who are motivated to quit, are not enjoying smoking, had family or friends who smoked, and who are interested in gradual cessation approaches may be more likely to participate in a smoking cessation trial.

AB - Objectives: This study examined sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics associated with consent to participate in a smoking cessation trial for socially disadvantaged smokers. Design: Baseline data were collected prior to seeking consent for the Call it Quits, a randomised controlled trial. Setting: An Australian social and community service organisation. Sociodemographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics were compared between smokers who agreed or declined to participate. Participants: Of the 584 smokers invited to participate, 431 (74%) consented and 153 (26%) declined. Results: Logistic regression modelling indicates the ORs of participation were twice as high for those reporting 'high' motivation to quit compared to the 'moderate' motivation group, and five times higher than the 'low' motivation group ( p=0.007). The ORs of consenting were higher for those with a preference for gradual reduction in cigarettes in quit attempts compared with 'no preference'. The ORs were lower for those reporting 'don't know' regarding their enjoyment of smoking compared to 'not at all' enjoying smoking, and reporting that fewer of their family or friends smoked compared to 'most or all'. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the characteristics of socially disadvantaged smokers who consent or decline to participate in a smoking cessation trial. Low-income smokers who are motivated to quit, are not enjoying smoking, had family or friends who smoked, and who are interested in gradual cessation approaches may be more likely to participate in a smoking cessation trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948182289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948182289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e008419

ER -