Comparing Self-Report and Observations to Assess the Implementation of an In-Home Program Serving At-Risk Families

Thomas Jai Gross, Kristin Duppong Hurley, Jordan Ross, Ronald Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing the implementation of home visitation interventions for families with at-risk children is an essential component of effective service delivery; however, collecting implementation assessment data is expensive. This study examined two different methods of assessing the adherence and quality of a home visitation program, provider self-reports of service delivery, and video observations of the home visit that assessed a total of 64 sessions. Detailed transcriptions were also coded with regard to quality of skills instruction. The two implementation assessment methods overlapped considerably regarding whether a core topic was discussed during the home visit and the percentage of time spent during the average session on many of the core components. Areas of divergence between the two assessment methods are reviewed. Implications for supervision and quality improvement efforts of home visitation providers are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-116
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Public Child Welfare
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Self Report
House Calls
Quality Improvement
divergence
supervision
video
instruction
time

Keywords

  • at-risk
  • families
  • fidelity
  • home visitation
  • implementation assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Comparing Self-Report and Observations to Assess the Implementation of an In-Home Program Serving At-Risk Families. / Gross, Thomas Jai; Hurley, Kristin Duppong; Ross, Jordan; Thompson, Ronald.

In: Journal of Public Child Welfare, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 96-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c2a111ec9a04245bd3ea28105ce71e9,
title = "Comparing Self-Report and Observations to Assess the Implementation of an In-Home Program Serving At-Risk Families",
abstract = "Assessing the implementation of home visitation interventions for families with at-risk children is an essential component of effective service delivery; however, collecting implementation assessment data is expensive. This study examined two different methods of assessing the adherence and quality of a home visitation program, provider self-reports of service delivery, and video observations of the home visit that assessed a total of 64 sessions. Detailed transcriptions were also coded with regard to quality of skills instruction. The two implementation assessment methods overlapped considerably regarding whether a core topic was discussed during the home visit and the percentage of time spent during the average session on many of the core components. Areas of divergence between the two assessment methods are reviewed. Implications for supervision and quality improvement efforts of home visitation providers are discussed.",
keywords = "at-risk, families, fidelity, home visitation, implementation assessment",
author = "Gross, {Thomas Jai} and Hurley, {Kristin Duppong} and Jordan Ross and Ronald Thompson",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15548732.2015.1114061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "96--116",
journal = "Journal of Public Child Welfare",
issn = "1554-8732",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Self-Report and Observations to Assess the Implementation of an In-Home Program Serving At-Risk Families

AU - Gross, Thomas Jai

AU - Hurley, Kristin Duppong

AU - Ross, Jordan

AU - Thompson, Ronald

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Assessing the implementation of home visitation interventions for families with at-risk children is an essential component of effective service delivery; however, collecting implementation assessment data is expensive. This study examined two different methods of assessing the adherence and quality of a home visitation program, provider self-reports of service delivery, and video observations of the home visit that assessed a total of 64 sessions. Detailed transcriptions were also coded with regard to quality of skills instruction. The two implementation assessment methods overlapped considerably regarding whether a core topic was discussed during the home visit and the percentage of time spent during the average session on many of the core components. Areas of divergence between the two assessment methods are reviewed. Implications for supervision and quality improvement efforts of home visitation providers are discussed.

AB - Assessing the implementation of home visitation interventions for families with at-risk children is an essential component of effective service delivery; however, collecting implementation assessment data is expensive. This study examined two different methods of assessing the adherence and quality of a home visitation program, provider self-reports of service delivery, and video observations of the home visit that assessed a total of 64 sessions. Detailed transcriptions were also coded with regard to quality of skills instruction. The two implementation assessment methods overlapped considerably regarding whether a core topic was discussed during the home visit and the percentage of time spent during the average session on many of the core components. Areas of divergence between the two assessment methods are reviewed. Implications for supervision and quality improvement efforts of home visitation providers are discussed.

KW - at-risk

KW - families

KW - fidelity

KW - home visitation

KW - implementation assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975783968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975783968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15548732.2015.1114061

DO - 10.1080/15548732.2015.1114061

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975783968

VL - 10

SP - 96

EP - 116

JO - Journal of Public Child Welfare

JF - Journal of Public Child Welfare

SN - 1554-8732

IS - 1

ER -