Comparing preference assessments: Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures

Tiffany Kodak, Wayne W Fisher, Michael E. Kelley, April Kisamore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current investigation, the results of a selection- and a duration-based preference assessment procedure were compared. A Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW) preference assessment [Windsor, J., Piché, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455] and a variation of a Free-Operant (FO) preference assessment procedure [Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620] were conducted with four participants. A reinforcer assessment was conducted to determine which preference assessment procedure identified the item that produced the highest rates of responding. The items identified as most highly preferred were different across preference assessment procedures for all participants. Results of the reinforcer assessment showed that the MSW identified the item that functioned as the most effective reinforcer for two participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1068-1077
Number of pages10
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Developmental Disabilities
Research
Applied Behavior Analysis

Keywords

  • Concurrent operants
  • Preference assessment
  • Reinforcer assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Comparing preference assessments : Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures. / Kodak, Tiffany; Fisher, Wayne W; Kelley, Michael E.; Kisamore, April.

In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 30, No. 5, 01.09.2009, p. 1068-1077.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c96340774b0f480a816fff1b50a9e4d8,
title = "Comparing preference assessments: Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures",
abstract = "In the current investigation, the results of a selection- and a duration-based preference assessment procedure were compared. A Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW) preference assessment [Windsor, J., Pich{\'e}, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455] and a variation of a Free-Operant (FO) preference assessment procedure [Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620] were conducted with four participants. A reinforcer assessment was conducted to determine which preference assessment procedure identified the item that produced the highest rates of responding. The items identified as most highly preferred were different across preference assessment procedures for all participants. Results of the reinforcer assessment showed that the MSW identified the item that functioned as the most effective reinforcer for two participants.",
keywords = "Concurrent operants, Preference assessment, Reinforcer assessment",
author = "Tiffany Kodak and Fisher, {Wayne W} and Kelley, {Michael E.} and April Kisamore",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1068--1077",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing preference assessments

T2 - Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures

AU - Kodak, Tiffany

AU - Fisher, Wayne W

AU - Kelley, Michael E.

AU - Kisamore, April

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - In the current investigation, the results of a selection- and a duration-based preference assessment procedure were compared. A Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW) preference assessment [Windsor, J., Piché, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455] and a variation of a Free-Operant (FO) preference assessment procedure [Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620] were conducted with four participants. A reinforcer assessment was conducted to determine which preference assessment procedure identified the item that produced the highest rates of responding. The items identified as most highly preferred were different across preference assessment procedures for all participants. Results of the reinforcer assessment showed that the MSW identified the item that functioned as the most effective reinforcer for two participants.

AB - In the current investigation, the results of a selection- and a duration-based preference assessment procedure were compared. A Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW) preference assessment [Windsor, J., Piché, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455] and a variation of a Free-Operant (FO) preference assessment procedure [Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620] were conducted with four participants. A reinforcer assessment was conducted to determine which preference assessment procedure identified the item that produced the highest rates of responding. The items identified as most highly preferred were different across preference assessment procedures for all participants. Results of the reinforcer assessment showed that the MSW identified the item that functioned as the most effective reinforcer for two participants.

KW - Concurrent operants

KW - Preference assessment

KW - Reinforcer assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64649107049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64649107049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 19327964

AN - SCOPUS:64649107049

VL - 30

SP - 1068

EP - 1077

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

IS - 5

ER -