Comparing piecewise regression and hysteresis models in assessing beef cattle heat stress

Kismiantini, S. Zhang, K. M. Eskridge, S. D. Kachman, Y. Qiu, T. Brown-Brandl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate change may generate more frequent heat waves, resulting in substantial cattle production losses through increased heat stress. Time lags between air temperature and an animal's body temperature have been recognized as valuable measures of heat stress, and developing methods for detecting time lags is important. Existing hysteresis models are useful for estimating air-body temperature time lags, especially when the air temperature follows a consistent diurnal sinusoidal function, such as when animals are housed in a controlled environment. However, in cattle feedlot or pasture operations, consistent sinusoidal air temperature patterns are not realistic, and a more flexible approach would be useful. In this article, piecewise regression models (linear and quadratic) are developed to estimate time lags under more general temperature trend conditions. Both piecewise regression and hysteresis models were fit to heat stress data of feedlot cattle. Simulations were conducted to compare the estimated time lags using both types of models. In the simulations, the asymmetric harmonic hysteresis model estimated time lags best, followed by the piecewise linear regression model, while the piecewise regression models were generally more efficient for both simulated and actual data. It was concluded that piecewise regression models are more appropriate than hysteresis models when applied to heat-stressed cattle in production environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-559
Number of pages11
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Beef
hysteresis
beef cattle
heat stress
Hysteresis
Hot Temperature
Linear Models
Air
air temperature
Temperature
cattle
Body Temperature
cattle production
feedlots
body temperature
Infrared Rays
Controlled Environment
Climate Change
Animals
heat

Keywords

  • Air-body temperature time lag
  • High temperatures
  • Nonlinear modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Food Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Comparing piecewise regression and hysteresis models in assessing beef cattle heat stress. / Kismiantini; Zhang, S.; Eskridge, K. M.; Kachman, S. D.; Qiu, Y.; Brown-Brandl, T.

In: Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 62, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 549-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{578663b483af4c218a5de34372151b57,
title = "Comparing piecewise regression and hysteresis models in assessing beef cattle heat stress",
abstract = "Climate change may generate more frequent heat waves, resulting in substantial cattle production losses through increased heat stress. Time lags between air temperature and an animal's body temperature have been recognized as valuable measures of heat stress, and developing methods for detecting time lags is important. Existing hysteresis models are useful for estimating air-body temperature time lags, especially when the air temperature follows a consistent diurnal sinusoidal function, such as when animals are housed in a controlled environment. However, in cattle feedlot or pasture operations, consistent sinusoidal air temperature patterns are not realistic, and a more flexible approach would be useful. In this article, piecewise regression models (linear and quadratic) are developed to estimate time lags under more general temperature trend conditions. Both piecewise regression and hysteresis models were fit to heat stress data of feedlot cattle. Simulations were conducted to compare the estimated time lags using both types of models. In the simulations, the asymmetric harmonic hysteresis model estimated time lags best, followed by the piecewise linear regression model, while the piecewise regression models were generally more efficient for both simulated and actual data. It was concluded that piecewise regression models are more appropriate than hysteresis models when applied to heat-stressed cattle in production environments.",
keywords = "Air-body temperature time lag, High temperatures, Nonlinear modeling",
author = "Kismiantini and S. Zhang and Eskridge, {K. M.} and Kachman, {S. D.} and Y. Qiu and T. Brown-Brandl",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/trans.12910",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "549--559",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing piecewise regression and hysteresis models in assessing beef cattle heat stress

AU - Kismiantini,

AU - Zhang, S.

AU - Eskridge, K. M.

AU - Kachman, S. D.

AU - Qiu, Y.

AU - Brown-Brandl, T.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Climate change may generate more frequent heat waves, resulting in substantial cattle production losses through increased heat stress. Time lags between air temperature and an animal's body temperature have been recognized as valuable measures of heat stress, and developing methods for detecting time lags is important. Existing hysteresis models are useful for estimating air-body temperature time lags, especially when the air temperature follows a consistent diurnal sinusoidal function, such as when animals are housed in a controlled environment. However, in cattle feedlot or pasture operations, consistent sinusoidal air temperature patterns are not realistic, and a more flexible approach would be useful. In this article, piecewise regression models (linear and quadratic) are developed to estimate time lags under more general temperature trend conditions. Both piecewise regression and hysteresis models were fit to heat stress data of feedlot cattle. Simulations were conducted to compare the estimated time lags using both types of models. In the simulations, the asymmetric harmonic hysteresis model estimated time lags best, followed by the piecewise linear regression model, while the piecewise regression models were generally more efficient for both simulated and actual data. It was concluded that piecewise regression models are more appropriate than hysteresis models when applied to heat-stressed cattle in production environments.

AB - Climate change may generate more frequent heat waves, resulting in substantial cattle production losses through increased heat stress. Time lags between air temperature and an animal's body temperature have been recognized as valuable measures of heat stress, and developing methods for detecting time lags is important. Existing hysteresis models are useful for estimating air-body temperature time lags, especially when the air temperature follows a consistent diurnal sinusoidal function, such as when animals are housed in a controlled environment. However, in cattle feedlot or pasture operations, consistent sinusoidal air temperature patterns are not realistic, and a more flexible approach would be useful. In this article, piecewise regression models (linear and quadratic) are developed to estimate time lags under more general temperature trend conditions. Both piecewise regression and hysteresis models were fit to heat stress data of feedlot cattle. Simulations were conducted to compare the estimated time lags using both types of models. In the simulations, the asymmetric harmonic hysteresis model estimated time lags best, followed by the piecewise linear regression model, while the piecewise regression models were generally more efficient for both simulated and actual data. It was concluded that piecewise regression models are more appropriate than hysteresis models when applied to heat-stressed cattle in production environments.

KW - Air-body temperature time lag

KW - High temperatures

KW - Nonlinear modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069433277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069433277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/trans.12910

DO - 10.13031/trans.12910

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069433277

VL - 62

SP - 549

EP - 559

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 2

ER -