Comparing Methods of Learning Clinical Prediction from Case Simulations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Feedback to physicians about how they use information in making judgments can improve the quality of their judgments, but questions remain about which types of feedback are most effective. The authors conducted a controlled study of feedback in 60 medical students learning to predict the risk of cardiovascular death based on the presence or absence of five risk factors. After a pretest of 40 cases abstracted from patient records, the students worked through 173 computer-simulated cases and a posttest of 40 patient cases. The students received no feedback, probability feedback (correct probability of cardiac death for each case), cognitive feedback (the correct cue weights compared with their own weights derived from the previous set of cases), or both types of feedback. Students who received probability feedback markedly improved both base rate calibration and discrimination. Those who received only cognitive feedback showed no improvement over control on any of the measures of learning. All subjects were highly consistent in their weightings. The superiority of probability feedback differed from previous findings that cognitive feedback was essential for mastery of multiple-cue-probability learning tasks. The information on cue-outcome relationships given by cognitive feedback may be more useful when these relationships are complex and the combining rule is not known, while the precise outcome information provided by probabilistic feedback is more useful when the combining rule is known and the cue- outcome relationships are straightforward. Thus, the optimal method of learning depends on the nature of the task. Key words: risk factors; computer simulations; heart disease. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:213-221)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-221
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Learning
Cues
Students
Probability Learning
Weights and Measures
Medical Students
Computer Simulation
Calibration
Heart Diseases
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Comparing Methods of Learning Clinical Prediction from Case Simulations. / Tape, Thomas Gerald; Kripal, J.; Wigton, Robert Swift.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.01.1992, p. 213-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec59aabd625b44de87ba6c66404440d0,
title = "Comparing Methods of Learning Clinical Prediction from Case Simulations",
abstract = "Feedback to physicians about how they use information in making judgments can improve the quality of their judgments, but questions remain about which types of feedback are most effective. The authors conducted a controlled study of feedback in 60 medical students learning to predict the risk of cardiovascular death based on the presence or absence of five risk factors. After a pretest of 40 cases abstracted from patient records, the students worked through 173 computer-simulated cases and a posttest of 40 patient cases. The students received no feedback, probability feedback (correct probability of cardiac death for each case), cognitive feedback (the correct cue weights compared with their own weights derived from the previous set of cases), or both types of feedback. Students who received probability feedback markedly improved both base rate calibration and discrimination. Those who received only cognitive feedback showed no improvement over control on any of the measures of learning. All subjects were highly consistent in their weightings. The superiority of probability feedback differed from previous findings that cognitive feedback was essential for mastery of multiple-cue-probability learning tasks. The information on cue-outcome relationships given by cognitive feedback may be more useful when these relationships are complex and the combining rule is not known, while the precise outcome information provided by probabilistic feedback is more useful when the combining rule is known and the cue- outcome relationships are straightforward. Thus, the optimal method of learning depends on the nature of the task. Key words: risk factors; computer simulations; heart disease. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:213-221)",
author = "Tape, {Thomas Gerald} and J. Kripal and Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X9201200307",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "213--221",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Methods of Learning Clinical Prediction from Case Simulations

AU - Tape, Thomas Gerald

AU - Kripal, J.

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Feedback to physicians about how they use information in making judgments can improve the quality of their judgments, but questions remain about which types of feedback are most effective. The authors conducted a controlled study of feedback in 60 medical students learning to predict the risk of cardiovascular death based on the presence or absence of five risk factors. After a pretest of 40 cases abstracted from patient records, the students worked through 173 computer-simulated cases and a posttest of 40 patient cases. The students received no feedback, probability feedback (correct probability of cardiac death for each case), cognitive feedback (the correct cue weights compared with their own weights derived from the previous set of cases), or both types of feedback. Students who received probability feedback markedly improved both base rate calibration and discrimination. Those who received only cognitive feedback showed no improvement over control on any of the measures of learning. All subjects were highly consistent in their weightings. The superiority of probability feedback differed from previous findings that cognitive feedback was essential for mastery of multiple-cue-probability learning tasks. The information on cue-outcome relationships given by cognitive feedback may be more useful when these relationships are complex and the combining rule is not known, while the precise outcome information provided by probabilistic feedback is more useful when the combining rule is known and the cue- outcome relationships are straightforward. Thus, the optimal method of learning depends on the nature of the task. Key words: risk factors; computer simulations; heart disease. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:213-221)

AB - Feedback to physicians about how they use information in making judgments can improve the quality of their judgments, but questions remain about which types of feedback are most effective. The authors conducted a controlled study of feedback in 60 medical students learning to predict the risk of cardiovascular death based on the presence or absence of five risk factors. After a pretest of 40 cases abstracted from patient records, the students worked through 173 computer-simulated cases and a posttest of 40 patient cases. The students received no feedback, probability feedback (correct probability of cardiac death for each case), cognitive feedback (the correct cue weights compared with their own weights derived from the previous set of cases), or both types of feedback. Students who received probability feedback markedly improved both base rate calibration and discrimination. Those who received only cognitive feedback showed no improvement over control on any of the measures of learning. All subjects were highly consistent in their weightings. The superiority of probability feedback differed from previous findings that cognitive feedback was essential for mastery of multiple-cue-probability learning tasks. The information on cue-outcome relationships given by cognitive feedback may be more useful when these relationships are complex and the combining rule is not known, while the precise outcome information provided by probabilistic feedback is more useful when the combining rule is known and the cue- outcome relationships are straightforward. Thus, the optimal method of learning depends on the nature of the task. Key words: risk factors; computer simulations; heart disease. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:213-221)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026690823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026690823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X9201200307

DO - 10.1177/0272989X9201200307

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 213

EP - 221

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -