Comparing methods for maintaining the safety of a child with pica

Linda A. LeBlanc, Cathleen C. Piazza, Mary A. Krug

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pica, a potentially life-threatening behavior problem exhibited among persons with mental retardation is sometimes addressed by methods such as application of restraints to reduce or eliminate associated risks (Rojahn, Schroeder, and Mulick, 1980). However, restraints may be associated with decreases in social interaction and negative impact on quality of life. We evaluated two methods (restraint vs. no restraint) for maintaining the safety of a client with pica on three dimensions: (a) level of pica, (b) therapist effort, and (c) impact on quality of life. Both methods prevented pica, however, the no restraint condition required less therapist effort and had less negative impact on quality of life. All three dimensions were included in a clinical decision-making model to determine the least restrictive, safe level of restraint for a 4-year-old girl while assessment and treatment procedures were conducted. The clinical utility of this multifactor decision- making model is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-220
Number of pages6
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1997

Fingerprint

Pica
Safety
Quality of Life
Interpersonal Relations
Intellectual Disability
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Comparing methods for maintaining the safety of a child with pica. / LeBlanc, Linda A.; Piazza, Cathleen C.; Krug, Mary A.

In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.05.1997, p. 215-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d599c1e43a149449b411b4e4d35248d,
title = "Comparing methods for maintaining the safety of a child with pica",
abstract = "Pica, a potentially life-threatening behavior problem exhibited among persons with mental retardation is sometimes addressed by methods such as application of restraints to reduce or eliminate associated risks (Rojahn, Schroeder, and Mulick, 1980). However, restraints may be associated with decreases in social interaction and negative impact on quality of life. We evaluated two methods (restraint vs. no restraint) for maintaining the safety of a client with pica on three dimensions: (a) level of pica, (b) therapist effort, and (c) impact on quality of life. Both methods prevented pica, however, the no restraint condition required less therapist effort and had less negative impact on quality of life. All three dimensions were included in a clinical decision-making model to determine the least restrictive, safe level of restraint for a 4-year-old girl while assessment and treatment procedures were conducted. The clinical utility of this multifactor decision- making model is discussed.",
author = "LeBlanc, {Linda A.} and Piazza, {Cathleen C.} and Krug, {Mary A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0891-4222(97)00004-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "215--220",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing methods for maintaining the safety of a child with pica

AU - LeBlanc, Linda A.

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

AU - Krug, Mary A.

PY - 1997/5/1

Y1 - 1997/5/1

N2 - Pica, a potentially life-threatening behavior problem exhibited among persons with mental retardation is sometimes addressed by methods such as application of restraints to reduce or eliminate associated risks (Rojahn, Schroeder, and Mulick, 1980). However, restraints may be associated with decreases in social interaction and negative impact on quality of life. We evaluated two methods (restraint vs. no restraint) for maintaining the safety of a client with pica on three dimensions: (a) level of pica, (b) therapist effort, and (c) impact on quality of life. Both methods prevented pica, however, the no restraint condition required less therapist effort and had less negative impact on quality of life. All three dimensions were included in a clinical decision-making model to determine the least restrictive, safe level of restraint for a 4-year-old girl while assessment and treatment procedures were conducted. The clinical utility of this multifactor decision- making model is discussed.

AB - Pica, a potentially life-threatening behavior problem exhibited among persons with mental retardation is sometimes addressed by methods such as application of restraints to reduce or eliminate associated risks (Rojahn, Schroeder, and Mulick, 1980). However, restraints may be associated with decreases in social interaction and negative impact on quality of life. We evaluated two methods (restraint vs. no restraint) for maintaining the safety of a client with pica on three dimensions: (a) level of pica, (b) therapist effort, and (c) impact on quality of life. Both methods prevented pica, however, the no restraint condition required less therapist effort and had less negative impact on quality of life. All three dimensions were included in a clinical decision-making model to determine the least restrictive, safe level of restraint for a 4-year-old girl while assessment and treatment procedures were conducted. The clinical utility of this multifactor decision- making model is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031010429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031010429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0891-4222(97)00004-8

DO - 10.1016/S0891-4222(97)00004-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9220545

AN - SCOPUS:0031010429

VL - 18

SP - 215

EP - 220

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

IS - 3

ER -