Comparing methods for examining relationships between prison crowding and inmate violence

John Wooldredge, Benjamin M Steiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of empirical relationships between indicators of prison crowding and inmate violence have uncovered null, negative, and positive relationships. These mixed findings may be due, in part, to cross-study differences in definitions of crowding, levels of analysis, and sample designs. We compared findings across some of the more popular approaches to study the relationship between facility crowding and the prevalence of inmate assaults in order to determine the implications of different methods for variation in estimates. Multi-level data from a national sample of 10,022 men confined in 203 state correctional facilities during 1997 were examined. Findings revealed differences across methods in the direction and significance of the crowding/assault relationship. These differences were then considered in order to derive a strategy for more uniform research on the topic. This strategy consists of including both total inmate population and design capacity as separate predictors in the same model, examination of tri-level data (inmates, facilities, and states) in order to control compositional differences in inmate populations across facilities and to remove confounding state-level differences in crowding levels and assault rates, and more careful consideration of secondary analyses of complex samples with sample weights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)795-826
Number of pages32
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Prisons
Violence
correctional institution
assault
violence
Population
Weights and Measures
Research
examination
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Inmate misconduct
  • Inmate violence
  • Prison crowding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Comparing methods for examining relationships between prison crowding and inmate violence. / Wooldredge, John; Steiner, Benjamin M.

In: Justice Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 795-826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b3ae268bdee46f58ed538200b3d961f,
title = "Comparing methods for examining relationships between prison crowding and inmate violence",
abstract = "Studies of empirical relationships between indicators of prison crowding and inmate violence have uncovered null, negative, and positive relationships. These mixed findings may be due, in part, to cross-study differences in definitions of crowding, levels of analysis, and sample designs. We compared findings across some of the more popular approaches to study the relationship between facility crowding and the prevalence of inmate assaults in order to determine the implications of different methods for variation in estimates. Multi-level data from a national sample of 10,022 men confined in 203 state correctional facilities during 1997 were examined. Findings revealed differences across methods in the direction and significance of the crowding/assault relationship. These differences were then considered in order to derive a strategy for more uniform research on the topic. This strategy consists of including both total inmate population and design capacity as separate predictors in the same model, examination of tri-level data (inmates, facilities, and states) in order to control compositional differences in inmate populations across facilities and to remove confounding state-level differences in crowding levels and assault rates, and more careful consideration of secondary analyses of complex samples with sample weights.",
keywords = "Inmate misconduct, Inmate violence, Prison crowding",
author = "John Wooldredge and Steiner, {Benjamin M}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07418820802427841",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "795--826",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing methods for examining relationships between prison crowding and inmate violence

AU - Wooldredge, John

AU - Steiner, Benjamin M

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Studies of empirical relationships between indicators of prison crowding and inmate violence have uncovered null, negative, and positive relationships. These mixed findings may be due, in part, to cross-study differences in definitions of crowding, levels of analysis, and sample designs. We compared findings across some of the more popular approaches to study the relationship between facility crowding and the prevalence of inmate assaults in order to determine the implications of different methods for variation in estimates. Multi-level data from a national sample of 10,022 men confined in 203 state correctional facilities during 1997 were examined. Findings revealed differences across methods in the direction and significance of the crowding/assault relationship. These differences were then considered in order to derive a strategy for more uniform research on the topic. This strategy consists of including both total inmate population and design capacity as separate predictors in the same model, examination of tri-level data (inmates, facilities, and states) in order to control compositional differences in inmate populations across facilities and to remove confounding state-level differences in crowding levels and assault rates, and more careful consideration of secondary analyses of complex samples with sample weights.

AB - Studies of empirical relationships between indicators of prison crowding and inmate violence have uncovered null, negative, and positive relationships. These mixed findings may be due, in part, to cross-study differences in definitions of crowding, levels of analysis, and sample designs. We compared findings across some of the more popular approaches to study the relationship between facility crowding and the prevalence of inmate assaults in order to determine the implications of different methods for variation in estimates. Multi-level data from a national sample of 10,022 men confined in 203 state correctional facilities during 1997 were examined. Findings revealed differences across methods in the direction and significance of the crowding/assault relationship. These differences were then considered in order to derive a strategy for more uniform research on the topic. This strategy consists of including both total inmate population and design capacity as separate predictors in the same model, examination of tri-level data (inmates, facilities, and states) in order to control compositional differences in inmate populations across facilities and to remove confounding state-level differences in crowding levels and assault rates, and more careful consideration of secondary analyses of complex samples with sample weights.

KW - Inmate misconduct

KW - Inmate violence

KW - Prison crowding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350783819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350783819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418820802427841

DO - 10.1080/07418820802427841

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 795

EP - 826

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 4

ER -