Comparative Intelligibility of Five Synthesized Voices

Stacie L. Rupprecht, David R Beukelman, Holli Vrtiska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intelligibility of words within sentences produced by five synthesized voices: DECTalkTM Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk, MacinTalk ProTM Male, and MacinTalk ProTM Female. Thirty adult participants, ranging in age from 20 to 40 years, listened to the five synthesized voices and transcribed the last word in each of the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) Test sentences (50 sentences for each synthesizer). The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance with repeated measures and a post-hoc test (Greenhouse Geisser) to determine differences among the voices. The MacinTalk voice was significantly less intelligible than the other four voices. The mean intelligibility scores of the DECTalk Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk Pro Male, and MacinTalk Pro Female voices were not significantly different from each other. Results suggest the need for further research, especially with the MacinTalk Pro voices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-248
Number of pages5
JournalAugmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Speech Perception
Noise
Analysis of Variance
Research

Keywords

  • communication
  • speech
  • speech synthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Comparative Intelligibility of Five Synthesized Voices. / Rupprecht, Stacie L.; Beukelman, David R; Vrtiska, Holli.

In: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.01.1995, p. 244-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rupprecht, Stacie L. ; Beukelman, David R ; Vrtiska, Holli. / Comparative Intelligibility of Five Synthesized Voices. In: Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1995 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 244-248.
@article{6a6303eb6e91437e8b32aee0613883cc,
title = "Comparative Intelligibility of Five Synthesized Voices",
abstract = "The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intelligibility of words within sentences produced by five synthesized voices: DECTalkTM Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk, MacinTalk ProTM Male, and MacinTalk ProTM Female. Thirty adult participants, ranging in age from 20 to 40 years, listened to the five synthesized voices and transcribed the last word in each of the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) Test sentences (50 sentences for each synthesizer). The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance with repeated measures and a post-hoc test (Greenhouse Geisser) to determine differences among the voices. The MacinTalk voice was significantly less intelligible than the other four voices. The mean intelligibility scores of the DECTalk Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk Pro Male, and MacinTalk Pro Female voices were not significantly different from each other. Results suggest the need for further research, especially with the MacinTalk Pro voices.",
keywords = "communication, speech, speech synthesis",
author = "Rupprecht, {Stacie L.} and Beukelman, {David R} and Holli Vrtiska",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07434619512331277379",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "244--248",
journal = "AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication",
issn = "0743-4618",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Intelligibility of Five Synthesized Voices

AU - Rupprecht, Stacie L.

AU - Beukelman, David R

AU - Vrtiska, Holli

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intelligibility of words within sentences produced by five synthesized voices: DECTalkTM Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk, MacinTalk ProTM Male, and MacinTalk ProTM Female. Thirty adult participants, ranging in age from 20 to 40 years, listened to the five synthesized voices and transcribed the last word in each of the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) Test sentences (50 sentences for each synthesizer). The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance with repeated measures and a post-hoc test (Greenhouse Geisser) to determine differences among the voices. The MacinTalk voice was significantly less intelligible than the other four voices. The mean intelligibility scores of the DECTalk Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk Pro Male, and MacinTalk Pro Female voices were not significantly different from each other. Results suggest the need for further research, especially with the MacinTalk Pro voices.

AB - The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intelligibility of words within sentences produced by five synthesized voices: DECTalkTM Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk, MacinTalk ProTM Male, and MacinTalk ProTM Female. Thirty adult participants, ranging in age from 20 to 40 years, listened to the five synthesized voices and transcribed the last word in each of the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) Test sentences (50 sentences for each synthesizer). The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance with repeated measures and a post-hoc test (Greenhouse Geisser) to determine differences among the voices. The MacinTalk voice was significantly less intelligible than the other four voices. The mean intelligibility scores of the DECTalk Paul, DECTalk Betty, MacinTalk Pro Male, and MacinTalk Pro Female voices were not significantly different from each other. Results suggest the need for further research, especially with the MacinTalk Pro voices.

KW - communication

KW - speech

KW - speech synthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029510649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029510649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07434619512331277379

DO - 10.1080/07434619512331277379

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 244

EP - 248

JO - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

JF - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

SN - 0743-4618

IS - 4

ER -