Coming to terms with lightness and brightness

Effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments

Barbara Blakeslee, Daniel Reetz, Mark McCourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To recover surface reflectance and illuminance from the raw luminance signal, the visual system must use prior assumptions and strategies that make use of additional sources of information. Indeed, it has been found that depending on experimental conditions, lightness, (apparent reflectance) may refer to judgments that are similar to brightness judgments (apparent luminance), that are similar to local brightness-contrast judgments, or that represent an independent third dimension of achromatic experience which exists only when the illumination across regions of the display is visibly non-uniform (L. E. Arend & B. Spehar, 1993a, 1993b). This means that lightness data generated in one experimental condition may not be comparable to lightness data measured in other conditions. We investigate this problem with regard to a history of data on simultaneous brightness-contrast by measuring brightness, brightness-contrast, and lightness in stimuli similar to those used in Gilchrist's edge-substitution studies (A. Gilchrist, S. Delman, & A. Jacobsen, 1983) and in stimuli similar to those used to test Gilchrist's intrinsic-image model against his newer anchoring model (A. Gilchrist, 2006). Our results clarify confusions that appear to stem from comparing different types of lightness judgments and from inadvertently using brightness as an index of lightness under conditions where independent lightness judgments are possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume8
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 6 2008

Fingerprint

Lighting

Keywords

  • Brightness
  • Brightness inductiom
  • Lightness
  • Psychophysics
  • Spatial vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Coming to terms with lightness and brightness : Effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments. / Blakeslee, Barbara; Reetz, Daniel; McCourt, Mark.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 8, No. 11, 3, 06.08.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{949f42d78f634debaab9045b83bb1b44,
title = "Coming to terms with lightness and brightness: Effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments",
abstract = "To recover surface reflectance and illuminance from the raw luminance signal, the visual system must use prior assumptions and strategies that make use of additional sources of information. Indeed, it has been found that depending on experimental conditions, lightness, (apparent reflectance) may refer to judgments that are similar to brightness judgments (apparent luminance), that are similar to local brightness-contrast judgments, or that represent an independent third dimension of achromatic experience which exists only when the illumination across regions of the display is visibly non-uniform (L. E. Arend & B. Spehar, 1993a, 1993b). This means that lightness data generated in one experimental condition may not be comparable to lightness data measured in other conditions. We investigate this problem with regard to a history of data on simultaneous brightness-contrast by measuring brightness, brightness-contrast, and lightness in stimuli similar to those used in Gilchrist's edge-substitution studies (A. Gilchrist, S. Delman, & A. Jacobsen, 1983) and in stimuli similar to those used to test Gilchrist's intrinsic-image model against his newer anchoring model (A. Gilchrist, 2006). Our results clarify confusions that appear to stem from comparing different types of lightness judgments and from inadvertently using brightness as an index of lightness under conditions where independent lightness judgments are possible.",
keywords = "Brightness, Brightness inductiom, Lightness, Psychophysics, Spatial vision",
author = "Barbara Blakeslee and Daniel Reetz and Mark McCourt",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1167/8.11.3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coming to terms with lightness and brightness

T2 - Effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments

AU - Blakeslee, Barbara

AU - Reetz, Daniel

AU - McCourt, Mark

PY - 2008/8/6

Y1 - 2008/8/6

N2 - To recover surface reflectance and illuminance from the raw luminance signal, the visual system must use prior assumptions and strategies that make use of additional sources of information. Indeed, it has been found that depending on experimental conditions, lightness, (apparent reflectance) may refer to judgments that are similar to brightness judgments (apparent luminance), that are similar to local brightness-contrast judgments, or that represent an independent third dimension of achromatic experience which exists only when the illumination across regions of the display is visibly non-uniform (L. E. Arend & B. Spehar, 1993a, 1993b). This means that lightness data generated in one experimental condition may not be comparable to lightness data measured in other conditions. We investigate this problem with regard to a history of data on simultaneous brightness-contrast by measuring brightness, brightness-contrast, and lightness in stimuli similar to those used in Gilchrist's edge-substitution studies (A. Gilchrist, S. Delman, & A. Jacobsen, 1983) and in stimuli similar to those used to test Gilchrist's intrinsic-image model against his newer anchoring model (A. Gilchrist, 2006). Our results clarify confusions that appear to stem from comparing different types of lightness judgments and from inadvertently using brightness as an index of lightness under conditions where independent lightness judgments are possible.

AB - To recover surface reflectance and illuminance from the raw luminance signal, the visual system must use prior assumptions and strategies that make use of additional sources of information. Indeed, it has been found that depending on experimental conditions, lightness, (apparent reflectance) may refer to judgments that are similar to brightness judgments (apparent luminance), that are similar to local brightness-contrast judgments, or that represent an independent third dimension of achromatic experience which exists only when the illumination across regions of the display is visibly non-uniform (L. E. Arend & B. Spehar, 1993a, 1993b). This means that lightness data generated in one experimental condition may not be comparable to lightness data measured in other conditions. We investigate this problem with regard to a history of data on simultaneous brightness-contrast by measuring brightness, brightness-contrast, and lightness in stimuli similar to those used in Gilchrist's edge-substitution studies (A. Gilchrist, S. Delman, & A. Jacobsen, 1983) and in stimuli similar to those used to test Gilchrist's intrinsic-image model against his newer anchoring model (A. Gilchrist, 2006). Our results clarify confusions that appear to stem from comparing different types of lightness judgments and from inadvertently using brightness as an index of lightness under conditions where independent lightness judgments are possible.

KW - Brightness

KW - Brightness inductiom

KW - Lightness

KW - Psychophysics

KW - Spatial vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49049090018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49049090018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/8.11.3

DO - 10.1167/8.11.3

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 11

M1 - 3

ER -