Collaborative Decision Skills Training: Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of a Novel Intervention

Emily B.H. Treichler, Andrea Avila, Eric A. Evans, William D. Spaulding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasing consumer empowerment and agency in treatment decision-making is a priority for improving recovery among people with serious mental illness (SMI), as it is associated with a number of positive outcomes, including improved treatment engagement and satisfaction. Although there are many tools to promote initiation of shared decision-making by providers, there are few tools empowering consumers to independently initiate collaborative decision-making (CDM). Therefore, this study tests the feasibility of a novel skills training intervention for outpatients with SMI, collaborative decision skills training (CDST). Twenty-one consumers with SMI currently receiving community-based day services participated in CDST. Four areas of feasibility were assessed-acceptability, demand, practicality, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Feasibility results were favorable, including high acceptability and practicality. Demand results were mixed: rates of attendance were high and attrition was low, but participants did not complete homework as often as expected. Finally, there was evidence CDST has a positive impact on targeted outcomes; participants reported an increased sense of personal recovery, and displayed improvements in both knowledge and skills targeted by CDST. CDST is feasible to implement with fidelity and is received well by participants. Next steps include larger controlled trials of CDST, which will better inform efficacy and implementation related questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychological Services
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 13 2018

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Feasibility Studies
Outpatients
Therapeutics
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Collaborative decision-making
  • Feasibility
  • Pilot study
  • Serious mental illness
  • Skills training intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Collaborative Decision Skills Training : Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of a Novel Intervention. / Treichler, Emily B.H.; Avila, Andrea; Evans, Eric A.; Spaulding, William D.

In: Psychological Services, 13.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd81f5bb4472481885defe338ff1a378,
title = "Collaborative Decision Skills Training: Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of a Novel Intervention",
abstract = "Increasing consumer empowerment and agency in treatment decision-making is a priority for improving recovery among people with serious mental illness (SMI), as it is associated with a number of positive outcomes, including improved treatment engagement and satisfaction. Although there are many tools to promote initiation of shared decision-making by providers, there are few tools empowering consumers to independently initiate collaborative decision-making (CDM). Therefore, this study tests the feasibility of a novel skills training intervention for outpatients with SMI, collaborative decision skills training (CDST). Twenty-one consumers with SMI currently receiving community-based day services participated in CDST. Four areas of feasibility were assessed-acceptability, demand, practicality, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Feasibility results were favorable, including high acceptability and practicality. Demand results were mixed: rates of attendance were high and attrition was low, but participants did not complete homework as often as expected. Finally, there was evidence CDST has a positive impact on targeted outcomes; participants reported an increased sense of personal recovery, and displayed improvements in both knowledge and skills targeted by CDST. CDST is feasible to implement with fidelity and is received well by participants. Next steps include larger controlled trials of CDST, which will better inform efficacy and implementation related questions.",
keywords = "Collaborative decision-making, Feasibility, Pilot study, Serious mental illness, Skills training intervention",
author = "Treichler, {Emily B.H.} and Andrea Avila and Evans, {Eric A.} and Spaulding, {William D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1037/ser0000275",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychological Services",
issn = "1541-1559",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative Decision Skills Training

T2 - Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of a Novel Intervention

AU - Treichler, Emily B.H.

AU - Avila, Andrea

AU - Evans, Eric A.

AU - Spaulding, William D.

PY - 2018/8/13

Y1 - 2018/8/13

N2 - Increasing consumer empowerment and agency in treatment decision-making is a priority for improving recovery among people with serious mental illness (SMI), as it is associated with a number of positive outcomes, including improved treatment engagement and satisfaction. Although there are many tools to promote initiation of shared decision-making by providers, there are few tools empowering consumers to independently initiate collaborative decision-making (CDM). Therefore, this study tests the feasibility of a novel skills training intervention for outpatients with SMI, collaborative decision skills training (CDST). Twenty-one consumers with SMI currently receiving community-based day services participated in CDST. Four areas of feasibility were assessed-acceptability, demand, practicality, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Feasibility results were favorable, including high acceptability and practicality. Demand results were mixed: rates of attendance were high and attrition was low, but participants did not complete homework as often as expected. Finally, there was evidence CDST has a positive impact on targeted outcomes; participants reported an increased sense of personal recovery, and displayed improvements in both knowledge and skills targeted by CDST. CDST is feasible to implement with fidelity and is received well by participants. Next steps include larger controlled trials of CDST, which will better inform efficacy and implementation related questions.

AB - Increasing consumer empowerment and agency in treatment decision-making is a priority for improving recovery among people with serious mental illness (SMI), as it is associated with a number of positive outcomes, including improved treatment engagement and satisfaction. Although there are many tools to promote initiation of shared decision-making by providers, there are few tools empowering consumers to independently initiate collaborative decision-making (CDM). Therefore, this study tests the feasibility of a novel skills training intervention for outpatients with SMI, collaborative decision skills training (CDST). Twenty-one consumers with SMI currently receiving community-based day services participated in CDST. Four areas of feasibility were assessed-acceptability, demand, practicality, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Feasibility results were favorable, including high acceptability and practicality. Demand results were mixed: rates of attendance were high and attrition was low, but participants did not complete homework as often as expected. Finally, there was evidence CDST has a positive impact on targeted outcomes; participants reported an increased sense of personal recovery, and displayed improvements in both knowledge and skills targeted by CDST. CDST is feasible to implement with fidelity and is received well by participants. Next steps include larger controlled trials of CDST, which will better inform efficacy and implementation related questions.

KW - Collaborative decision-making

KW - Feasibility

KW - Pilot study

KW - Serious mental illness

KW - Skills training intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051344795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051344795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ser0000275

DO - 10.1037/ser0000275

M3 - Article

C2 - 30102050

AN - SCOPUS:85051344795

JO - Psychological Services

JF - Psychological Services

SN - 1541-1559

ER -