Coherence and correspondence in medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many controversies in medical science can be framed as tension between a coherence approach (which seeks logic and explanation) and a correspondence approach (which emphasizes empirical correctness). In many instances, a coherencebased theory leads to an understanding of disease that is not supported by empirical evidence. Physicians and patients alike tend to favor the coherence approach even in the face of strong, contradictory correspondence evidence. Examples include the management of atrial fibrillation, treatment of acute bronchitis, and the use of Vitamin E to prevent heart disease. Despite the frequent occurrence of controversy stemming from coherence-correspondence conflicts, medical professionals are generally unaware of these terms and the philosophical traditions that underlie them. Learning about the coherence-correspondence distinction and using the best of both approaches could not only help reconcile controversy but also lead to striking advances in medical science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-140
Number of pages7
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume4
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Medicine
Bronchitis
Vitamin E
Atrial Fibrillation
Heart Diseases
Learning
Physicians
Therapeutics
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Coherence
  • Correspondence
  • Medical decision making
  • Philosophy of science
  • Theories of truth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Coherence and correspondence in medicine. / Tape, Thomas Gerald.

In: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 134-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{827eec3ef90c4210bc3b51338456442b,
title = "Coherence and correspondence in medicine",
abstract = "Many controversies in medical science can be framed as tension between a coherence approach (which seeks logic and explanation) and a correspondence approach (which emphasizes empirical correctness). In many instances, a coherencebased theory leads to an understanding of disease that is not supported by empirical evidence. Physicians and patients alike tend to favor the coherence approach even in the face of strong, contradictory correspondence evidence. Examples include the management of atrial fibrillation, treatment of acute bronchitis, and the use of Vitamin E to prevent heart disease. Despite the frequent occurrence of controversy stemming from coherence-correspondence conflicts, medical professionals are generally unaware of these terms and the philosophical traditions that underlie them. Learning about the coherence-correspondence distinction and using the best of both approaches could not only help reconcile controversy but also lead to striking advances in medical science.",
keywords = "Coherence, Correspondence, Medical decision making, Philosophy of science, Theories of truth",
author = "Tape, {Thomas Gerald}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "134--140",
journal = "Judgment and Decision Making",
issn = "1930-2975",
publisher = "Society for Judgment and Decision Making",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coherence and correspondence in medicine

AU - Tape, Thomas Gerald

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Many controversies in medical science can be framed as tension between a coherence approach (which seeks logic and explanation) and a correspondence approach (which emphasizes empirical correctness). In many instances, a coherencebased theory leads to an understanding of disease that is not supported by empirical evidence. Physicians and patients alike tend to favor the coherence approach even in the face of strong, contradictory correspondence evidence. Examples include the management of atrial fibrillation, treatment of acute bronchitis, and the use of Vitamin E to prevent heart disease. Despite the frequent occurrence of controversy stemming from coherence-correspondence conflicts, medical professionals are generally unaware of these terms and the philosophical traditions that underlie them. Learning about the coherence-correspondence distinction and using the best of both approaches could not only help reconcile controversy but also lead to striking advances in medical science.

AB - Many controversies in medical science can be framed as tension between a coherence approach (which seeks logic and explanation) and a correspondence approach (which emphasizes empirical correctness). In many instances, a coherencebased theory leads to an understanding of disease that is not supported by empirical evidence. Physicians and patients alike tend to favor the coherence approach even in the face of strong, contradictory correspondence evidence. Examples include the management of atrial fibrillation, treatment of acute bronchitis, and the use of Vitamin E to prevent heart disease. Despite the frequent occurrence of controversy stemming from coherence-correspondence conflicts, medical professionals are generally unaware of these terms and the philosophical traditions that underlie them. Learning about the coherence-correspondence distinction and using the best of both approaches could not only help reconcile controversy but also lead to striking advances in medical science.

KW - Coherence

KW - Correspondence

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Theories of truth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350168695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350168695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350168695

VL - 4

SP - 134

EP - 140

JO - Judgment and Decision Making

JF - Judgment and Decision Making

SN - 1930-2975

IS - 2

ER -