Cognitive representation in transitive inference

A comparison of four corvid species

Alan B. Bond, Cynthia A. Wei, Alan C Kamil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During operant transitive inference experiments, subjects are trained on adjacent stimulus pairs in an implicit linear hierarchy in which responses to higher ranked stimuli are rewarded. Two contrasting forms of cognitive representation are often used to explain resulting choice behavior. Associative representation is based on memory for the reward history of each stimulus. Relational representation depends on memory for the context in which stimuli have been presented. Natural history characteristics that require accurate configural memory, such as social complexity or reliance on cached food, should tend to promote greater use of relational representation. To test this hypothesis, four corvid species with contrasting natural histories were trained on the transitive inference task: pinyon jays, Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus; Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana; azure-winged magpies, Cyanopica cyanus; and western scrub jays, Aphelocoma californica. A simplified computer model of associative representation displayed a characteristic pattern of accuracy as a function of position in the hierarchy. Analysis of the deviation of each subject's performance from this predicted pattern yielded an index of reliance on relational representation. Regression of index scores against rankings of social complexity and caching reliance indicated that both traits were significantly and independently associated with greater use of relational representation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-292
Number of pages10
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

Natural History
natural history
Choice Behavior
Centaurea
Reward
computer simulation
Computer Simulation
Food
testing
Aphelocoma californica

Keywords

  • Birds
  • Evolution
  • Hippocampus
  • Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Cognitive representation in transitive inference : A comparison of four corvid species. / Bond, Alan B.; Wei, Cynthia A.; Kamil, Alan C.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 85, No. 3, 01.10.2010, p. 283-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bond, Alan B. ; Wei, Cynthia A. ; Kamil, Alan C. / Cognitive representation in transitive inference : A comparison of four corvid species. In: Behavioural Processes. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 283-292.
@article{739c775360ce44988df8f6b17c8d81d9,
title = "Cognitive representation in transitive inference: A comparison of four corvid species",
abstract = "During operant transitive inference experiments, subjects are trained on adjacent stimulus pairs in an implicit linear hierarchy in which responses to higher ranked stimuli are rewarded. Two contrasting forms of cognitive representation are often used to explain resulting choice behavior. Associative representation is based on memory for the reward history of each stimulus. Relational representation depends on memory for the context in which stimuli have been presented. Natural history characteristics that require accurate configural memory, such as social complexity or reliance on cached food, should tend to promote greater use of relational representation. To test this hypothesis, four corvid species with contrasting natural histories were trained on the transitive inference task: pinyon jays, Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus; Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana; azure-winged magpies, Cyanopica cyanus; and western scrub jays, Aphelocoma californica. A simplified computer model of associative representation displayed a characteristic pattern of accuracy as a function of position in the hierarchy. Analysis of the deviation of each subject's performance from this predicted pattern yielded an index of reliance on relational representation. Regression of index scores against rankings of social complexity and caching reliance indicated that both traits were significantly and independently associated with greater use of relational representation.",
keywords = "Birds, Evolution, Hippocampus, Memory",
author = "Bond, {Alan B.} and Wei, {Cynthia A.} and Kamil, {Alan C}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2010.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "283--292",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive representation in transitive inference

T2 - A comparison of four corvid species

AU - Bond, Alan B.

AU - Wei, Cynthia A.

AU - Kamil, Alan C

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - During operant transitive inference experiments, subjects are trained on adjacent stimulus pairs in an implicit linear hierarchy in which responses to higher ranked stimuli are rewarded. Two contrasting forms of cognitive representation are often used to explain resulting choice behavior. Associative representation is based on memory for the reward history of each stimulus. Relational representation depends on memory for the context in which stimuli have been presented. Natural history characteristics that require accurate configural memory, such as social complexity or reliance on cached food, should tend to promote greater use of relational representation. To test this hypothesis, four corvid species with contrasting natural histories were trained on the transitive inference task: pinyon jays, Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus; Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana; azure-winged magpies, Cyanopica cyanus; and western scrub jays, Aphelocoma californica. A simplified computer model of associative representation displayed a characteristic pattern of accuracy as a function of position in the hierarchy. Analysis of the deviation of each subject's performance from this predicted pattern yielded an index of reliance on relational representation. Regression of index scores against rankings of social complexity and caching reliance indicated that both traits were significantly and independently associated with greater use of relational representation.

AB - During operant transitive inference experiments, subjects are trained on adjacent stimulus pairs in an implicit linear hierarchy in which responses to higher ranked stimuli are rewarded. Two contrasting forms of cognitive representation are often used to explain resulting choice behavior. Associative representation is based on memory for the reward history of each stimulus. Relational representation depends on memory for the context in which stimuli have been presented. Natural history characteristics that require accurate configural memory, such as social complexity or reliance on cached food, should tend to promote greater use of relational representation. To test this hypothesis, four corvid species with contrasting natural histories were trained on the transitive inference task: pinyon jays, Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus; Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana; azure-winged magpies, Cyanopica cyanus; and western scrub jays, Aphelocoma californica. A simplified computer model of associative representation displayed a characteristic pattern of accuracy as a function of position in the hierarchy. Analysis of the deviation of each subject's performance from this predicted pattern yielded an index of reliance on relational representation. Regression of index scores against rankings of social complexity and caching reliance indicated that both traits were significantly and independently associated with greater use of relational representation.

KW - Birds

KW - Evolution

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149284634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149284634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 283

EP - 292

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 3

ER -