Cognition and causality, fiction and explanation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The debate about the causal efficacy of cognition involves two overlapping but different issues: (1) whether explanatory fictions improve upon the power and utility of nonfictional explanations of behavior, and (2) whether any explanation, either purely empirical or purely inferential, can describe proximal causality in behavioral functioning. The resolution of the first issue depends on the purpose to which the explanation is to be put. The resolution of the second issue depends on the larger paradigmatic context in which causality is understood. In modern biosystemic models of behavior, linear causality is important only as a special case of the multidirectional and reciprocal causality which characterizes complex self-regulating systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-282
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Causality
Cognition
Linear Models
Fiction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Cognition and causality, fiction and explanation. / Spaulding, William D.

In: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 279-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51d4c42c68ae44e290bccbfde6d924bd,
title = "Cognition and causality, fiction and explanation",
abstract = "The debate about the causal efficacy of cognition involves two overlapping but different issues: (1) whether explanatory fictions improve upon the power and utility of nonfictional explanations of behavior, and (2) whether any explanation, either purely empirical or purely inferential, can describe proximal causality in behavioral functioning. The resolution of the first issue depends on the purpose to which the explanation is to be put. The resolution of the second issue depends on the larger paradigmatic context in which causality is understood. In modern biosystemic models of behavior, linear causality is important only as a special case of the multidirectional and reciprocal causality which characterizes complex self-regulating systems.",
author = "Spaulding, {William D}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0005-7916(95)00032-U",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "279--282",
journal = "Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry",
issn = "0005-7916",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognition and causality, fiction and explanation

AU - Spaulding, William D

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - The debate about the causal efficacy of cognition involves two overlapping but different issues: (1) whether explanatory fictions improve upon the power and utility of nonfictional explanations of behavior, and (2) whether any explanation, either purely empirical or purely inferential, can describe proximal causality in behavioral functioning. The resolution of the first issue depends on the purpose to which the explanation is to be put. The resolution of the second issue depends on the larger paradigmatic context in which causality is understood. In modern biosystemic models of behavior, linear causality is important only as a special case of the multidirectional and reciprocal causality which characterizes complex self-regulating systems.

AB - The debate about the causal efficacy of cognition involves two overlapping but different issues: (1) whether explanatory fictions improve upon the power and utility of nonfictional explanations of behavior, and (2) whether any explanation, either purely empirical or purely inferential, can describe proximal causality in behavioral functioning. The resolution of the first issue depends on the purpose to which the explanation is to be put. The resolution of the second issue depends on the larger paradigmatic context in which causality is understood. In modern biosystemic models of behavior, linear causality is important only as a special case of the multidirectional and reciprocal causality which characterizes complex self-regulating systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028825398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028825398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00032-U

DO - 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00032-U

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 279

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

SN - 0005-7916

IS - 3

ER -