Cochlear reflectance and otoacoustic emission predictions of hearing loss

Stephen T. Neely, Sara E. Fultz, Judy G. Kopun, Natalie M. Lenzen, Daniel M. Rasetshwane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission (OAE) that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to compare wideband CR to distortion-product (DP) OAEs in two ways: (1) in a clinical-screening paradigm where the task is to determine whether an ear is normal or has hearing loss and (2) in the prediction of audiometric thresholds. The goal of the study was to assess the clinical utility of CR. Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 124 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at 3 stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB sound pressure level) was used to elicit the CR. DPOAEs were elicited using primary tones spanning a wide frequency range (1 to 16 kHz). Predictions of auditory status (i.e., hearing-threshold category) and predictions of audiometric threshold were based on regression analysis. Test performance (identification of normal versus impaired hearing) was evaluated using clinical decision theory. Results: When regressions were based only on physiological measurements near the audiometric frequency, the accuracy of CR predictions of auditory status and audiometric threshold was less than reported in previous studies using DPOAE measurements. CR predictions were improved when regressions were based on measurements obtained at many frequencies. CR predictions were further improved when regressions were performed on males and females separately. Conclusions: Compared with CR measurements, DPOAE measurements have the advantages in a screening paradigm of better test performance and shorter test time. The full potential of CR measurements to predict audiometric thresholds may require further improvements in signal-processing methods to increase its signal to noise ratio. CR measurements have theoretical significance in revealing the number of cycles of delay at each frequency that is most sensitive to hearing loss.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)951-960
Number of pages10
JournalEar and hearing
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cochlea
Hearing Loss
Hearing
Pressure
Decision Theory
Ear Canal
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Ear
Noise
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Cochlear reflectance
  • Distortion product otoacoustic emissions
  • Sensorineural hearing loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Cochlear reflectance and otoacoustic emission predictions of hearing loss. / Neely, Stephen T.; Fultz, Sara E.; Kopun, Judy G.; Lenzen, Natalie M.; Rasetshwane, Daniel M.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 951-960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neely, Stephen T. ; Fultz, Sara E. ; Kopun, Judy G. ; Lenzen, Natalie M. ; Rasetshwane, Daniel M. / Cochlear reflectance and otoacoustic emission predictions of hearing loss. In: Ear and hearing. 2019 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 951-960.
@article{30df9576dae24f53a8b66d535e798c73,
title = "Cochlear reflectance and otoacoustic emission predictions of hearing loss",
abstract = "Objectives: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission (OAE) that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to compare wideband CR to distortion-product (DP) OAEs in two ways: (1) in a clinical-screening paradigm where the task is to determine whether an ear is normal or has hearing loss and (2) in the prediction of audiometric thresholds. The goal of the study was to assess the clinical utility of CR. Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 124 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at 3 stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB sound pressure level) was used to elicit the CR. DPOAEs were elicited using primary tones spanning a wide frequency range (1 to 16 kHz). Predictions of auditory status (i.e., hearing-threshold category) and predictions of audiometric threshold were based on regression analysis. Test performance (identification of normal versus impaired hearing) was evaluated using clinical decision theory. Results: When regressions were based only on physiological measurements near the audiometric frequency, the accuracy of CR predictions of auditory status and audiometric threshold was less than reported in previous studies using DPOAE measurements. CR predictions were improved when regressions were based on measurements obtained at many frequencies. CR predictions were further improved when regressions were performed on males and females separately. Conclusions: Compared with CR measurements, DPOAE measurements have the advantages in a screening paradigm of better test performance and shorter test time. The full potential of CR measurements to predict audiometric thresholds may require further improvements in signal-processing methods to increase its signal to noise ratio. CR measurements have theoretical significance in revealing the number of cycles of delay at each frequency that is most sensitive to hearing loss.",
keywords = "Cochlear reflectance, Distortion product otoacoustic emissions, Sensorineural hearing loss",
author = "Neely, {Stephen T.} and Fultz, {Sara E.} and Kopun, {Judy G.} and Lenzen, {Natalie M.} and Rasetshwane, {Daniel M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AUD.0000000000000677",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "951--960",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochlear reflectance and otoacoustic emission predictions of hearing loss

AU - Neely, Stephen T.

AU - Fultz, Sara E.

AU - Kopun, Judy G.

AU - Lenzen, Natalie M.

AU - Rasetshwane, Daniel M.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Objectives: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission (OAE) that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to compare wideband CR to distortion-product (DP) OAEs in two ways: (1) in a clinical-screening paradigm where the task is to determine whether an ear is normal or has hearing loss and (2) in the prediction of audiometric thresholds. The goal of the study was to assess the clinical utility of CR. Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 124 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at 3 stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB sound pressure level) was used to elicit the CR. DPOAEs were elicited using primary tones spanning a wide frequency range (1 to 16 kHz). Predictions of auditory status (i.e., hearing-threshold category) and predictions of audiometric threshold were based on regression analysis. Test performance (identification of normal versus impaired hearing) was evaluated using clinical decision theory. Results: When regressions were based only on physiological measurements near the audiometric frequency, the accuracy of CR predictions of auditory status and audiometric threshold was less than reported in previous studies using DPOAE measurements. CR predictions were improved when regressions were based on measurements obtained at many frequencies. CR predictions were further improved when regressions were performed on males and females separately. Conclusions: Compared with CR measurements, DPOAE measurements have the advantages in a screening paradigm of better test performance and shorter test time. The full potential of CR measurements to predict audiometric thresholds may require further improvements in signal-processing methods to increase its signal to noise ratio. CR measurements have theoretical significance in revealing the number of cycles of delay at each frequency that is most sensitive to hearing loss.

AB - Objectives: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission (OAE) that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to compare wideband CR to distortion-product (DP) OAEs in two ways: (1) in a clinical-screening paradigm where the task is to determine whether an ear is normal or has hearing loss and (2) in the prediction of audiometric thresholds. The goal of the study was to assess the clinical utility of CR. Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 124 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at 3 stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB sound pressure level) was used to elicit the CR. DPOAEs were elicited using primary tones spanning a wide frequency range (1 to 16 kHz). Predictions of auditory status (i.e., hearing-threshold category) and predictions of audiometric threshold were based on regression analysis. Test performance (identification of normal versus impaired hearing) was evaluated using clinical decision theory. Results: When regressions were based only on physiological measurements near the audiometric frequency, the accuracy of CR predictions of auditory status and audiometric threshold was less than reported in previous studies using DPOAE measurements. CR predictions were improved when regressions were based on measurements obtained at many frequencies. CR predictions were further improved when regressions were performed on males and females separately. Conclusions: Compared with CR measurements, DPOAE measurements have the advantages in a screening paradigm of better test performance and shorter test time. The full potential of CR measurements to predict audiometric thresholds may require further improvements in signal-processing methods to increase its signal to noise ratio. CR measurements have theoretical significance in revealing the number of cycles of delay at each frequency that is most sensitive to hearing loss.

KW - Cochlear reflectance

KW - Distortion product otoacoustic emissions

KW - Sensorineural hearing loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068885918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068885918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000677

DO - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000677

M3 - Article

C2 - 30399010

AN - SCOPUS:85068885918

VL - 40

SP - 951

EP - 960

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -