Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire

Laura R. Iwasaki, Mark W Beatty, C. Jared Randall, Jeffrey C. Nickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficiency of tooth movement associated with some orthodontic mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and bracket. This study examined the effects of bracket ligation forces (FN Ligation) and mastication on friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. Preliminary data from 5 orthodontists and 5 orthodontic residents characterized average tight and loose stainless steel FN Ligation. These values were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a custom device used to estimate changes in the measurement of ex vivo and intraoral frictional forces, represented by μa, the apparent coefficient of static friction. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place to determine whether vibration eliminated friction when compared to ex vivo measurements. Nested analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests determined the effects of ligation type and environmental variables. No significant differences (P > .01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose stainless steel ligation. Intraoral μa values for elastic ligation were significantly greater than ex vivo μa values (P ≤ .001). The results suggested that vibration introduced by mastication did not eliminate friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. In addition, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FN Ligation, although ligation techniques were well controlled. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data. These variations could affect treatment efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)408-415
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume123
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Friction
Stainless Steel
Ligation
Mastication
Vibration
Orthodontics
Tooth Movement Techniques
Equipment and Supplies
Gingiva
Mechanics
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire. / Iwasaki, Laura R.; Beatty, Mark W; Randall, C. Jared; Nickel, Jeffrey C.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 123, No. 4, 01.01.2003, p. 408-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3bec830d94fc4a4fb4e17be55d91bae3,
title = "Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire",
abstract = "The efficiency of tooth movement associated with some orthodontic mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and bracket. This study examined the effects of bracket ligation forces (FN Ligation) and mastication on friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. Preliminary data from 5 orthodontists and 5 orthodontic residents characterized average tight and loose stainless steel FN Ligation. These values were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a custom device used to estimate changes in the measurement of ex vivo and intraoral frictional forces, represented by μa, the apparent coefficient of static friction. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place to determine whether vibration eliminated friction when compared to ex vivo measurements. Nested analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests determined the effects of ligation type and environmental variables. No significant differences (P > .01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose stainless steel ligation. Intraoral μa values for elastic ligation were significantly greater than ex vivo μa values (P ≤ .001). The results suggested that vibration introduced by mastication did not eliminate friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. In addition, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FN Ligation, although ligation techniques were well controlled. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data. These variations could affect treatment efficiency.",
author = "Iwasaki, {Laura R.} and Beatty, {Mark W} and Randall, {C. Jared} and Nickel, {Jeffrey C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/mod.2003.61",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "408--415",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire

AU - Iwasaki, Laura R.

AU - Beatty, Mark W

AU - Randall, C. Jared

AU - Nickel, Jeffrey C.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The efficiency of tooth movement associated with some orthodontic mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and bracket. This study examined the effects of bracket ligation forces (FN Ligation) and mastication on friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. Preliminary data from 5 orthodontists and 5 orthodontic residents characterized average tight and loose stainless steel FN Ligation. These values were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a custom device used to estimate changes in the measurement of ex vivo and intraoral frictional forces, represented by μa, the apparent coefficient of static friction. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place to determine whether vibration eliminated friction when compared to ex vivo measurements. Nested analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests determined the effects of ligation type and environmental variables. No significant differences (P > .01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose stainless steel ligation. Intraoral μa values for elastic ligation were significantly greater than ex vivo μa values (P ≤ .001). The results suggested that vibration introduced by mastication did not eliminate friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. In addition, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FN Ligation, although ligation techniques were well controlled. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data. These variations could affect treatment efficiency.

AB - The efficiency of tooth movement associated with some orthodontic mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and bracket. This study examined the effects of bracket ligation forces (FN Ligation) and mastication on friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. Preliminary data from 5 orthodontists and 5 orthodontic residents characterized average tight and loose stainless steel FN Ligation. These values were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a custom device used to estimate changes in the measurement of ex vivo and intraoral frictional forces, represented by μa, the apparent coefficient of static friction. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place to determine whether vibration eliminated friction when compared to ex vivo measurements. Nested analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests determined the effects of ligation type and environmental variables. No significant differences (P > .01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose stainless steel ligation. Intraoral μa values for elastic ligation were significantly greater than ex vivo μa values (P ≤ .001). The results suggested that vibration introduced by mastication did not eliminate friction when sliding a bracket along an archwire. In addition, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FN Ligation, although ligation techniques were well controlled. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data. These variations could affect treatment efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037851983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037851983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mod.2003.61

DO - 10.1067/mod.2003.61

M3 - Article

VL - 123

SP - 408

EP - 415

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 4

ER -