Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic medical library

Cynthia M Schmidt, N. L. Eckerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Academic medical librarians responsible for monograph acquisition face a challenging task. From the plethora of medical monographs published each year, academic medical librarians must select those most useful to their patrons. Unfortunately, none of the selection tools available to medical librarians are specifically intended to assist academic librarians with medical monograph selection. The few short core collection lists that are available are intended for use in the small hospital or internal medicine department library. As these are the only selection tools available, however, many academic medical librarians spend considerable time reviewing these collection lists and place heavy emphasis on the acquisition of listed books. The study reported here was initiated to determine whether the circulation of listed books in an academic library justified the emphasis placed on the acquisition of these books. Circulation statistics for "listed" and "nonlisted" books in the hematology (WH) section of Indiana University School of Medicine's Ruth Lilly Medical Library were studied. The average circulation figures for listed books were nearly two times as high as the corresponding figures for the WH books in general. These data support the policies of those academic medical libraries that place a high priority on collection of listed books.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-169
Number of pages5
JournalBulletin of the Medical Library Association
Volume89
Issue number2
StatePublished - Oct 30 2001

Fingerprint

Medical Libraries
Librarians
librarian
Libraries
medicine
Hospital Medicine
Hematology
Internal Medicine
statistics
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic medical library. / Schmidt, Cynthia M; Eckerman, N. L.

In: Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 89, No. 2, 30.10.2001, p. 165-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0315f2130d142e287b7474bb1b456fb,
title = "Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic medical library",
abstract = "Academic medical librarians responsible for monograph acquisition face a challenging task. From the plethora of medical monographs published each year, academic medical librarians must select those most useful to their patrons. Unfortunately, none of the selection tools available to medical librarians are specifically intended to assist academic librarians with medical monograph selection. The few short core collection lists that are available are intended for use in the small hospital or internal medicine department library. As these are the only selection tools available, however, many academic medical librarians spend considerable time reviewing these collection lists and place heavy emphasis on the acquisition of listed books. The study reported here was initiated to determine whether the circulation of listed books in an academic library justified the emphasis placed on the acquisition of these books. Circulation statistics for {"}listed{"} and {"}nonlisted{"} books in the hematology (WH) section of Indiana University School of Medicine's Ruth Lilly Medical Library were studied. The average circulation figures for listed books were nearly two times as high as the corresponding figures for the WH books in general. These data support the policies of those academic medical libraries that place a high priority on collection of listed books.",
author = "Schmidt, {Cynthia M} and Eckerman, {N. L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
day = "30",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "165--169",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic medical library

AU - Schmidt, Cynthia M

AU - Eckerman, N. L.

PY - 2001/10/30

Y1 - 2001/10/30

N2 - Academic medical librarians responsible for monograph acquisition face a challenging task. From the plethora of medical monographs published each year, academic medical librarians must select those most useful to their patrons. Unfortunately, none of the selection tools available to medical librarians are specifically intended to assist academic librarians with medical monograph selection. The few short core collection lists that are available are intended for use in the small hospital or internal medicine department library. As these are the only selection tools available, however, many academic medical librarians spend considerable time reviewing these collection lists and place heavy emphasis on the acquisition of listed books. The study reported here was initiated to determine whether the circulation of listed books in an academic library justified the emphasis placed on the acquisition of these books. Circulation statistics for "listed" and "nonlisted" books in the hematology (WH) section of Indiana University School of Medicine's Ruth Lilly Medical Library were studied. The average circulation figures for listed books were nearly two times as high as the corresponding figures for the WH books in general. These data support the policies of those academic medical libraries that place a high priority on collection of listed books.

AB - Academic medical librarians responsible for monograph acquisition face a challenging task. From the plethora of medical monographs published each year, academic medical librarians must select those most useful to their patrons. Unfortunately, none of the selection tools available to medical librarians are specifically intended to assist academic librarians with medical monograph selection. The few short core collection lists that are available are intended for use in the small hospital or internal medicine department library. As these are the only selection tools available, however, many academic medical librarians spend considerable time reviewing these collection lists and place heavy emphasis on the acquisition of listed books. The study reported here was initiated to determine whether the circulation of listed books in an academic library justified the emphasis placed on the acquisition of these books. Circulation statistics for "listed" and "nonlisted" books in the hematology (WH) section of Indiana University School of Medicine's Ruth Lilly Medical Library were studied. The average circulation figures for listed books were nearly two times as high as the corresponding figures for the WH books in general. These data support the policies of those academic medical libraries that place a high priority on collection of listed books.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034768834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034768834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 165

EP - 169

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 2

ER -