Charges associated with imaging techniques in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss

Samantha Anne, Samuel Trosman, Timothy Haffey, Raj Sindwani, Katie Geelan-Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The best imaging study for evaluation of pediatric hearing loss is debated and it is well known magnetic resonance imaging is more costly than computed tomography. The objective of this study is to evaluate charges of computed tomography temporal bone (CTTB) versus magnetic resonance imaging brain, internal auditory canal/cerebellopontine angle (MRI IAC/CPA), with and without sedation in the pediatric population in order to assess to what extent the charges for the procedure are increased. In addition, differences in need for sedation and duration of sedation will be evaluated. Methods All patients, 0–18 years that underwent CTTB or MRI IAC/CPA, between January 2013 through December 2014 within department of otolaryngology. Results 120 CTTBs (118 non-sedated and 2 sedated) and 51 MRI IAC/CPAs (32 non-sedated and 19 sedated) were performed. Average charge for non-sedated CTTB was $1856. CTTB scan under sedation incurred total additional charges of $2385. Average charges for non-sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $3770. Technical charges for sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $151 lower ($2858) but had additional sedation charges of $2256, a recovery room charge of $250, and additional professional fees of $1496 for total charges of $7621. 37% of MRI IAC/CPAs needed sedation to be completed in comparison to 1.6% of CTTB. Conclusion MRI IAC/CPAs are, on average, twice as costly as CTTBs. Almost 40% of patients need sedation to complete MRI IAC/CPA. These considerations may factor into decision making when choosing imaging modality in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-27
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume89
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cerebellopontine Angle
Hearing Loss
Temporal Bone
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pediatrics
Brain
Recovery Room
Fees and Charges
Otolaryngology
Decision Making
Population

Keywords

  • Charges
  • Computed tomography
  • Hearing loss
  • Magnetic resonance imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Charges associated with imaging techniques in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss. / Anne, Samantha; Trosman, Samuel; Haffey, Timothy; Sindwani, Raj; Geelan-Hansen, Katie.

In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 89, 01.10.2016, p. 25-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{654addddc3044a52a24ab81fa479388b,
title = "Charges associated with imaging techniques in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss",
abstract = "Objective The best imaging study for evaluation of pediatric hearing loss is debated and it is well known magnetic resonance imaging is more costly than computed tomography. The objective of this study is to evaluate charges of computed tomography temporal bone (CTTB) versus magnetic resonance imaging brain, internal auditory canal/cerebellopontine angle (MRI IAC/CPA), with and without sedation in the pediatric population in order to assess to what extent the charges for the procedure are increased. In addition, differences in need for sedation and duration of sedation will be evaluated. Methods All patients, 0–18 years that underwent CTTB or MRI IAC/CPA, between January 2013 through December 2014 within department of otolaryngology. Results 120 CTTBs (118 non-sedated and 2 sedated) and 51 MRI IAC/CPAs (32 non-sedated and 19 sedated) were performed. Average charge for non-sedated CTTB was $1856. CTTB scan under sedation incurred total additional charges of $2385. Average charges for non-sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $3770. Technical charges for sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $151 lower ($2858) but had additional sedation charges of $2256, a recovery room charge of $250, and additional professional fees of $1496 for total charges of $7621. 37{\%} of MRI IAC/CPAs needed sedation to be completed in comparison to 1.6{\%} of CTTB. Conclusion MRI IAC/CPAs are, on average, twice as costly as CTTBs. Almost 40{\%} of patients need sedation to complete MRI IAC/CPA. These considerations may factor into decision making when choosing imaging modality in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss.",
keywords = "Charges, Computed tomography, Hearing loss, Magnetic resonance imaging",
author = "Samantha Anne and Samuel Trosman and Timothy Haffey and Raj Sindwani and Katie Geelan-Hansen",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "25--27",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charges associated with imaging techniques in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss

AU - Anne, Samantha

AU - Trosman, Samuel

AU - Haffey, Timothy

AU - Sindwani, Raj

AU - Geelan-Hansen, Katie

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objective The best imaging study for evaluation of pediatric hearing loss is debated and it is well known magnetic resonance imaging is more costly than computed tomography. The objective of this study is to evaluate charges of computed tomography temporal bone (CTTB) versus magnetic resonance imaging brain, internal auditory canal/cerebellopontine angle (MRI IAC/CPA), with and without sedation in the pediatric population in order to assess to what extent the charges for the procedure are increased. In addition, differences in need for sedation and duration of sedation will be evaluated. Methods All patients, 0–18 years that underwent CTTB or MRI IAC/CPA, between January 2013 through December 2014 within department of otolaryngology. Results 120 CTTBs (118 non-sedated and 2 sedated) and 51 MRI IAC/CPAs (32 non-sedated and 19 sedated) were performed. Average charge for non-sedated CTTB was $1856. CTTB scan under sedation incurred total additional charges of $2385. Average charges for non-sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $3770. Technical charges for sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $151 lower ($2858) but had additional sedation charges of $2256, a recovery room charge of $250, and additional professional fees of $1496 for total charges of $7621. 37% of MRI IAC/CPAs needed sedation to be completed in comparison to 1.6% of CTTB. Conclusion MRI IAC/CPAs are, on average, twice as costly as CTTBs. Almost 40% of patients need sedation to complete MRI IAC/CPA. These considerations may factor into decision making when choosing imaging modality in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss.

AB - Objective The best imaging study for evaluation of pediatric hearing loss is debated and it is well known magnetic resonance imaging is more costly than computed tomography. The objective of this study is to evaluate charges of computed tomography temporal bone (CTTB) versus magnetic resonance imaging brain, internal auditory canal/cerebellopontine angle (MRI IAC/CPA), with and without sedation in the pediatric population in order to assess to what extent the charges for the procedure are increased. In addition, differences in need for sedation and duration of sedation will be evaluated. Methods All patients, 0–18 years that underwent CTTB or MRI IAC/CPA, between January 2013 through December 2014 within department of otolaryngology. Results 120 CTTBs (118 non-sedated and 2 sedated) and 51 MRI IAC/CPAs (32 non-sedated and 19 sedated) were performed. Average charge for non-sedated CTTB was $1856. CTTB scan under sedation incurred total additional charges of $2385. Average charges for non-sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $3770. Technical charges for sedated MRI IAC/CPA was $151 lower ($2858) but had additional sedation charges of $2256, a recovery room charge of $250, and additional professional fees of $1496 for total charges of $7621. 37% of MRI IAC/CPAs needed sedation to be completed in comparison to 1.6% of CTTB. Conclusion MRI IAC/CPAs are, on average, twice as costly as CTTBs. Almost 40% of patients need sedation to complete MRI IAC/CPA. These considerations may factor into decision making when choosing imaging modality in evaluation of pediatric hearing loss.

KW - Charges

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979498045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979498045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 27619023

AN - SCOPUS:84979498045

VL - 89

SP - 25

EP - 27

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

ER -