Changing the support of a spatial covariate: A simulation study

Tisha Hooks, Jeffrey F. Pedersen, David B. Marx, Roch E. Gaussoin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly able to capture spatially referenced data on both a response and a covariate more frequently and in more detail. A combination of geostatisical models and analysis of covariance methods may be used to analyze such data. However, very basic questions regarding the effects of using a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable must be addressed to utilize these methods most efficiently. In this experiment, a simulation study was conducted to assess the following: (i) the gain in efficiency when geostatistical models are used, (ii) the gain in efficiency when analysis of covariance methods are used, and (iii) the effects of including a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable in the analysis. This study suggests that analyses which both account for spatial structure and exploit information from a covariate are most powerful. Also, the results indicate that the support of the covariate should be as close as possible to the support of the response variable to obtain the most accurate experimental results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-628
Number of pages7
JournalCrop Science
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

researchers
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Hooks, T., Pedersen, J. F., Marx, D. B., & Gaussoin, R. E. (2007). Changing the support of a spatial covariate: A simulation study. Crop Science, 47(2), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0490

Changing the support of a spatial covariate : A simulation study. / Hooks, Tisha; Pedersen, Jeffrey F.; Marx, David B.; Gaussoin, Roch E.

In: Crop Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.03.2007, p. 622-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hooks, T, Pedersen, JF, Marx, DB & Gaussoin, RE 2007, 'Changing the support of a spatial covariate: A simulation study', Crop Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 622-628. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0490
Hooks, Tisha ; Pedersen, Jeffrey F. ; Marx, David B. ; Gaussoin, Roch E. / Changing the support of a spatial covariate : A simulation study. In: Crop Science. 2007 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 622-628.
@article{ad865594145745e48a7deb0d506e182b,
title = "Changing the support of a spatial covariate: A simulation study",
abstract = "Researchers are increasingly able to capture spatially referenced data on both a response and a covariate more frequently and in more detail. A combination of geostatisical models and analysis of covariance methods may be used to analyze such data. However, very basic questions regarding the effects of using a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable must be addressed to utilize these methods most efficiently. In this experiment, a simulation study was conducted to assess the following: (i) the gain in efficiency when geostatistical models are used, (ii) the gain in efficiency when analysis of covariance methods are used, and (iii) the effects of including a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable in the analysis. This study suggests that analyses which both account for spatial structure and exploit information from a covariate are most powerful. Also, the results indicate that the support of the covariate should be as close as possible to the support of the response variable to obtain the most accurate experimental results.",
author = "Tisha Hooks and Pedersen, {Jeffrey F.} and Marx, {David B.} and Gaussoin, {Roch E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0490",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "622--628",
journal = "Crop Science",
issn = "0011-183X",
publisher = "Crop Science Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing the support of a spatial covariate

T2 - A simulation study

AU - Hooks, Tisha

AU - Pedersen, Jeffrey F.

AU - Marx, David B.

AU - Gaussoin, Roch E.

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - Researchers are increasingly able to capture spatially referenced data on both a response and a covariate more frequently and in more detail. A combination of geostatisical models and analysis of covariance methods may be used to analyze such data. However, very basic questions regarding the effects of using a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable must be addressed to utilize these methods most efficiently. In this experiment, a simulation study was conducted to assess the following: (i) the gain in efficiency when geostatistical models are used, (ii) the gain in efficiency when analysis of covariance methods are used, and (iii) the effects of including a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable in the analysis. This study suggests that analyses which both account for spatial structure and exploit information from a covariate are most powerful. Also, the results indicate that the support of the covariate should be as close as possible to the support of the response variable to obtain the most accurate experimental results.

AB - Researchers are increasingly able to capture spatially referenced data on both a response and a covariate more frequently and in more detail. A combination of geostatisical models and analysis of covariance methods may be used to analyze such data. However, very basic questions regarding the effects of using a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable must be addressed to utilize these methods most efficiently. In this experiment, a simulation study was conducted to assess the following: (i) the gain in efficiency when geostatistical models are used, (ii) the gain in efficiency when analysis of covariance methods are used, and (iii) the effects of including a covariate whose support differs from that of the response variable in the analysis. This study suggests that analyses which both account for spatial structure and exploit information from a covariate are most powerful. Also, the results indicate that the support of the covariate should be as close as possible to the support of the response variable to obtain the most accurate experimental results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247217480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247217480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0490

DO - 10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0490

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34247217480

VL - 47

SP - 622

EP - 628

JO - Crop Science

JF - Crop Science

SN - 0011-183X

IS - 2

ER -