Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

Zoltán Z. Nagy, Györgyi Munkácsy, Ronald R Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the mesopic functions of excimer laser treated eyes with different treatment diameters and different laser beam delivery systems. METHODS: In Group 1, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF scanning laser beam excimer laser. The treatment diameter was 5.0 mm. In Group 2, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 70G·scan flying spot excimer laser; the chosen treatment diameter was 6.5 mm. In Group 3, there were 38 eyes with no treatment; vision was corrected only with spectacles (control group). All eyes had 20/20 best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before surgery, as did the control group. Measurements were carried out preoperatively and at 12 months following surgery. All eyes exhibited normal corneal wound healing, and subepithelial haze was <0.5 according to Hanna's scale. Mesopic functions (mesopic vision and glare sensitivity) were tested with the Mesoptometer II. RESULTS: The average preoperative refractive error in Group 1 was -3.40 D; in Group 2, -3.38 D; in Group 3, -3.44 D. In Group 1, 34% of the treated eyes met the night driving requirements (recognition at 1:5 contrast level), whereas in Group 2, 85%, and in Group 3, 95% of the eyes fulfilled this criteria. When contrast vision was tested under glare conditions in Group 1, 31.6%; in Group 2, 80%; and in Group 3, 94.7% of the eyes identified the target orientation (Landolt ring) at contrast level 1:5. CONCLUSIONS: The unoperated spectacle wearers had better results in all tested functions. The larger 6.5-mm treatment diameter with the use of the flying spot laser beam delivery system resulted in better mesopic function and contrast vision under mesopic conditions than the smaller 5.0-mm diameter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-252
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Mesopic Vision
Photorefractive Keratectomy
Myopia
Excimer Lasers
Glare
Lasers
Therapeutics
Control Groups
Refractive Errors
Wound Healing
Visual Acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. / Nagy, Zoltán Z.; Munkácsy, Györgyi; Krueger, Ronald R.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 249-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagy, Zoltán Z. ; Munkácsy, Györgyi ; Krueger, Ronald R. / Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 249-252.
@article{68be3d5f59414f0b8dd63e9dfd1a06ec,
title = "Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the mesopic functions of excimer laser treated eyes with different treatment diameters and different laser beam delivery systems. METHODS: In Group 1, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF scanning laser beam excimer laser. The treatment diameter was 5.0 mm. In Group 2, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 70G·scan flying spot excimer laser; the chosen treatment diameter was 6.5 mm. In Group 3, there were 38 eyes with no treatment; vision was corrected only with spectacles (control group). All eyes had 20/20 best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before surgery, as did the control group. Measurements were carried out preoperatively and at 12 months following surgery. All eyes exhibited normal corneal wound healing, and subepithelial haze was <0.5 according to Hanna's scale. Mesopic functions (mesopic vision and glare sensitivity) were tested with the Mesoptometer II. RESULTS: The average preoperative refractive error in Group 1 was -3.40 D; in Group 2, -3.38 D; in Group 3, -3.44 D. In Group 1, 34{\%} of the treated eyes met the night driving requirements (recognition at 1:5 contrast level), whereas in Group 2, 85{\%}, and in Group 3, 95{\%} of the eyes fulfilled this criteria. When contrast vision was tested under glare conditions in Group 1, 31.6{\%}; in Group 2, 80{\%}; and in Group 3, 94.7{\%} of the eyes identified the target orientation (Landolt ring) at contrast level 1:5. CONCLUSIONS: The unoperated spectacle wearers had better results in all tested functions. The larger 6.5-mm treatment diameter with the use of the flying spot laser beam delivery system resulted in better mesopic function and contrast vision under mesopic conditions than the smaller 5.0-mm diameter.",
author = "Nagy, {Zolt{\'a}n Z.} and Gy{\"o}rgyi Munk{\'a}csy and Krueger, {Ronald R}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "249--252",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

AU - Nagy, Zoltán Z.

AU - Munkácsy, Györgyi

AU - Krueger, Ronald R

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the mesopic functions of excimer laser treated eyes with different treatment diameters and different laser beam delivery systems. METHODS: In Group 1, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF scanning laser beam excimer laser. The treatment diameter was 5.0 mm. In Group 2, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 70G·scan flying spot excimer laser; the chosen treatment diameter was 6.5 mm. In Group 3, there were 38 eyes with no treatment; vision was corrected only with spectacles (control group). All eyes had 20/20 best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before surgery, as did the control group. Measurements were carried out preoperatively and at 12 months following surgery. All eyes exhibited normal corneal wound healing, and subepithelial haze was <0.5 according to Hanna's scale. Mesopic functions (mesopic vision and glare sensitivity) were tested with the Mesoptometer II. RESULTS: The average preoperative refractive error in Group 1 was -3.40 D; in Group 2, -3.38 D; in Group 3, -3.44 D. In Group 1, 34% of the treated eyes met the night driving requirements (recognition at 1:5 contrast level), whereas in Group 2, 85%, and in Group 3, 95% of the eyes fulfilled this criteria. When contrast vision was tested under glare conditions in Group 1, 31.6%; in Group 2, 80%; and in Group 3, 94.7% of the eyes identified the target orientation (Landolt ring) at contrast level 1:5. CONCLUSIONS: The unoperated spectacle wearers had better results in all tested functions. The larger 6.5-mm treatment diameter with the use of the flying spot laser beam delivery system resulted in better mesopic function and contrast vision under mesopic conditions than the smaller 5.0-mm diameter.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the mesopic functions of excimer laser treated eyes with different treatment diameters and different laser beam delivery systems. METHODS: In Group 1, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF scanning laser beam excimer laser. The treatment diameter was 5.0 mm. In Group 2, 38 eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 70G·scan flying spot excimer laser; the chosen treatment diameter was 6.5 mm. In Group 3, there were 38 eyes with no treatment; vision was corrected only with spectacles (control group). All eyes had 20/20 best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before surgery, as did the control group. Measurements were carried out preoperatively and at 12 months following surgery. All eyes exhibited normal corneal wound healing, and subepithelial haze was <0.5 according to Hanna's scale. Mesopic functions (mesopic vision and glare sensitivity) were tested with the Mesoptometer II. RESULTS: The average preoperative refractive error in Group 1 was -3.40 D; in Group 2, -3.38 D; in Group 3, -3.44 D. In Group 1, 34% of the treated eyes met the night driving requirements (recognition at 1:5 contrast level), whereas in Group 2, 85%, and in Group 3, 95% of the eyes fulfilled this criteria. When contrast vision was tested under glare conditions in Group 1, 31.6%; in Group 2, 80%; and in Group 3, 94.7% of the eyes identified the target orientation (Landolt ring) at contrast level 1:5. CONCLUSIONS: The unoperated spectacle wearers had better results in all tested functions. The larger 6.5-mm treatment diameter with the use of the flying spot laser beam delivery system resulted in better mesopic function and contrast vision under mesopic conditions than the smaller 5.0-mm diameter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036001145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036001145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 249

EP - 252

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 3

ER -