Challenging assumptions about uninsured children in the pediatric emergency department

William M. McDonnell, Elisabeth Guenther

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing increased volumes and crowding problems. Although crowding is often blamed on uninsured patients, the role of uninsured children is unclear. We compared ED use by insured and uninsured children. Methods: Parents of children presenting at a tertiary care pediatric hospital ED were surveyed to determine health insurance coverage and frequency of ED use. Hospital billing records were reviewed separately to validate our survey results. Results were compared with Census Bureau data on the prevalence of uninsured children. Results: We enrolled 2024 participants in the survey arm. Of all children 48.4% (n = 972) were privately insured, 42.1% (n = 846) have government insurance, and 9.5% (n = 191) were uninsured. Billing records showed that 10.2% (n = 3825) of pediatric ED patients during the previous year were uninsured. Census data showed that 13% of children statewide were uninsured. Among survey subjects, uninsured children were more likely than privately insured children (53% vs 42%), but less likely than children with government insurance (67%), to have moderate ED use (≥1 additional ED visit in 12 months; P < 0.001) or frequent ED use (≥5 visits in 12 months; 4% vs 2% vs 8%; P < 0.001). When private and government insurance categories were combined, uninsured children showed no greater likelihood of moderate ED use (53% vs 53%, P = 0.89) or frequent ED use (4% vs 5%, P = 0.71) than insured children did. Conclusions: Uninsured pediatric patients were not disproportionately represented in the ED population. Moreover, uninsured children were not more likely than insured children to be moderate or frequent ED users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-439
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics
Insurance
Crowding
Censuses
Pediatric Hospitals
Insurance Coverage
Hospital Records
Hospital Departments
Tertiary Healthcare
Health Insurance
Parents

Keywords

  • emergency department crowding
  • emergency department use
  • health care delivery/access

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Challenging assumptions about uninsured children in the pediatric emergency department. / McDonnell, William M.; Guenther, Elisabeth.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 28, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 436-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McDonnell, William M. ; Guenther, Elisabeth. / Challenging assumptions about uninsured children in the pediatric emergency department. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 436-439.
@article{efd8a519194b4944837e0b88d0c11252,
title = "Challenging assumptions about uninsured children in the pediatric emergency department",
abstract = "Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing increased volumes and crowding problems. Although crowding is often blamed on uninsured patients, the role of uninsured children is unclear. We compared ED use by insured and uninsured children. Methods: Parents of children presenting at a tertiary care pediatric hospital ED were surveyed to determine health insurance coverage and frequency of ED use. Hospital billing records were reviewed separately to validate our survey results. Results were compared with Census Bureau data on the prevalence of uninsured children. Results: We enrolled 2024 participants in the survey arm. Of all children 48.4{\%} (n = 972) were privately insured, 42.1{\%} (n = 846) have government insurance, and 9.5{\%} (n = 191) were uninsured. Billing records showed that 10.2{\%} (n = 3825) of pediatric ED patients during the previous year were uninsured. Census data showed that 13{\%} of children statewide were uninsured. Among survey subjects, uninsured children were more likely than privately insured children (53{\%} vs 42{\%}), but less likely than children with government insurance (67{\%}), to have moderate ED use (≥1 additional ED visit in 12 months; P < 0.001) or frequent ED use (≥5 visits in 12 months; 4{\%} vs 2{\%} vs 8{\%}; P < 0.001). When private and government insurance categories were combined, uninsured children showed no greater likelihood of moderate ED use (53{\%} vs 53{\%}, P = 0.89) or frequent ED use (4{\%} vs 5{\%}, P = 0.71) than insured children did. Conclusions: Uninsured pediatric patients were not disproportionately represented in the ED population. Moreover, uninsured children were not more likely than insured children to be moderate or frequent ED users.",
keywords = "emergency department crowding, emergency department use, health care delivery/access",
author = "McDonnell, {William M.} and Elisabeth Guenther",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182531ab3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "436--439",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging assumptions about uninsured children in the pediatric emergency department

AU - McDonnell, William M.

AU - Guenther, Elisabeth

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing increased volumes and crowding problems. Although crowding is often blamed on uninsured patients, the role of uninsured children is unclear. We compared ED use by insured and uninsured children. Methods: Parents of children presenting at a tertiary care pediatric hospital ED were surveyed to determine health insurance coverage and frequency of ED use. Hospital billing records were reviewed separately to validate our survey results. Results were compared with Census Bureau data on the prevalence of uninsured children. Results: We enrolled 2024 participants in the survey arm. Of all children 48.4% (n = 972) were privately insured, 42.1% (n = 846) have government insurance, and 9.5% (n = 191) were uninsured. Billing records showed that 10.2% (n = 3825) of pediatric ED patients during the previous year were uninsured. Census data showed that 13% of children statewide were uninsured. Among survey subjects, uninsured children were more likely than privately insured children (53% vs 42%), but less likely than children with government insurance (67%), to have moderate ED use (≥1 additional ED visit in 12 months; P < 0.001) or frequent ED use (≥5 visits in 12 months; 4% vs 2% vs 8%; P < 0.001). When private and government insurance categories were combined, uninsured children showed no greater likelihood of moderate ED use (53% vs 53%, P = 0.89) or frequent ED use (4% vs 5%, P = 0.71) than insured children did. Conclusions: Uninsured pediatric patients were not disproportionately represented in the ED population. Moreover, uninsured children were not more likely than insured children to be moderate or frequent ED users.

AB - Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing increased volumes and crowding problems. Although crowding is often blamed on uninsured patients, the role of uninsured children is unclear. We compared ED use by insured and uninsured children. Methods: Parents of children presenting at a tertiary care pediatric hospital ED were surveyed to determine health insurance coverage and frequency of ED use. Hospital billing records were reviewed separately to validate our survey results. Results were compared with Census Bureau data on the prevalence of uninsured children. Results: We enrolled 2024 participants in the survey arm. Of all children 48.4% (n = 972) were privately insured, 42.1% (n = 846) have government insurance, and 9.5% (n = 191) were uninsured. Billing records showed that 10.2% (n = 3825) of pediatric ED patients during the previous year were uninsured. Census data showed that 13% of children statewide were uninsured. Among survey subjects, uninsured children were more likely than privately insured children (53% vs 42%), but less likely than children with government insurance (67%), to have moderate ED use (≥1 additional ED visit in 12 months; P < 0.001) or frequent ED use (≥5 visits in 12 months; 4% vs 2% vs 8%; P < 0.001). When private and government insurance categories were combined, uninsured children showed no greater likelihood of moderate ED use (53% vs 53%, P = 0.89) or frequent ED use (4% vs 5%, P = 0.71) than insured children did. Conclusions: Uninsured pediatric patients were not disproportionately represented in the ED population. Moreover, uninsured children were not more likely than insured children to be moderate or frequent ED users.

KW - emergency department crowding

KW - emergency department use

KW - health care delivery/access

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861098698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861098698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182531ab3

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182531ab3

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22531192

AN - SCOPUS:84861098698

VL - 28

SP - 436

EP - 439

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 5

ER -