Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics

Sheng Lu, Haoliang Duan, Curt Greisen, Shane M Farritor, Richard Arnold, Cory Hogan, Matthew Dick, Mahmood Fateh, Gary Carr

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Vehicle/Track dynamic simulation programs are now used routinely in the rail industry in areas such as vehicle and track design, derailment investigation, and prediction of vehicle/track behavior under a variety of conditions. In these investigations the accuracy and validity of the simulation highly depends on information input into the program pertaining to both the vehicle and the track. Track geometry cars provide a variety of track measurements which are used to characterize the track (e.g. gage, cross level, profile, curvature, etc.) but these measurements do not include track stiffness information. For lack of better data these simulations generally assume constant track stiffness and this can lead to significant inaccuracy. The University of Nebraska (UNL), under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, has developed a method to estimate vertical track deflection and stiffness from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. The system has been tested on thousands of miles of track. It is believed that these vertical track stiffness estimates, along with the standard track geometry data can now be used to improve vehicle/track simulation results. In this paper, sites from recent testing of the University of Nebraska system were chosen to be studied with the vehicle dynamics software VAMPIRE®. These case studies demonstrate scenarios where the variation of track stiffness may significantly affect vehicle dynamics performance in different aspects. Results suggest that wheel unloading may be increased by up to 20% by the inclusion of vertical stiffness data in the simulations. Car body vibration and dynamic wheel loads also tend to be affected by the stiffness variation. The proposed approach has limitations because stiffness estimates are made without direct measurements of wheel loads which leads to possible errors in the estimate. Also, the inadequacy of the Winkler model used in the process of stiffness estimation may also cause some inaccuracies. These limitations are further explored in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010
Pages145-154
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 5 2010
EventASME 2010 Joint Rail Conference, JRC2010 - Urbana, IL, United States
Duration: Apr 27 2010Apr 29 2010

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010
Volume2

Conference

ConferenceASME 2010 Joint Rail Conference, JRC2010
CountryUnited States
CityUrbana, IL
Period4/27/104/29/10

Fingerprint

Railroad tracks
Stiffness
simulation
mathematics
Wheels
Railroad cars
sponsorship
railroad
Rails
revenue
Derailments
inclusion
scenario
Geometry
Railroads
cause
industry
lack
Unloading
Gages

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation

Cite this

Lu, S., Duan, H., Greisen, C., Farritor, S. M., Arnold, R., Hogan, C., ... Carr, G. (2010). Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics. In Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010 (pp. 145-154). (Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010; Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2010-36124

Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics. / Lu, Sheng; Duan, Haoliang; Greisen, Curt; Farritor, Shane M; Arnold, Richard; Hogan, Cory; Dick, Matthew; Fateh, Mahmood; Carr, Gary.

Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010. 2010. p. 145-154 (Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010; Vol. 2).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lu, S, Duan, H, Greisen, C, Farritor, SM, Arnold, R, Hogan, C, Dick, M, Fateh, M & Carr, G 2010, Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics. in Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010. Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010, vol. 2, pp. 145-154, ASME 2010 Joint Rail Conference, JRC2010, Urbana, IL, United States, 4/27/10. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2010-36124
Lu S, Duan H, Greisen C, Farritor SM, Arnold R, Hogan C et al. Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics. In Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010. 2010. p. 145-154. (Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2010-36124
Lu, Sheng ; Duan, Haoliang ; Greisen, Curt ; Farritor, Shane M ; Arnold, Richard ; Hogan, Cory ; Dick, Matthew ; Fateh, Mahmood ; Carr, Gary. / Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics. Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010. 2010. pp. 145-154 (Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010).
@inproceedings{c3ac28d993d14be1af514dc95908322e,
title = "Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics",
abstract = "Vehicle/Track dynamic simulation programs are now used routinely in the rail industry in areas such as vehicle and track design, derailment investigation, and prediction of vehicle/track behavior under a variety of conditions. In these investigations the accuracy and validity of the simulation highly depends on information input into the program pertaining to both the vehicle and the track. Track geometry cars provide a variety of track measurements which are used to characterize the track (e.g. gage, cross level, profile, curvature, etc.) but these measurements do not include track stiffness information. For lack of better data these simulations generally assume constant track stiffness and this can lead to significant inaccuracy. The University of Nebraska (UNL), under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, has developed a method to estimate vertical track deflection and stiffness from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. The system has been tested on thousands of miles of track. It is believed that these vertical track stiffness estimates, along with the standard track geometry data can now be used to improve vehicle/track simulation results. In this paper, sites from recent testing of the University of Nebraska system were chosen to be studied with the vehicle dynamics software VAMPIRE{\circledR}. These case studies demonstrate scenarios where the variation of track stiffness may significantly affect vehicle dynamics performance in different aspects. Results suggest that wheel unloading may be increased by up to 20{\%} by the inclusion of vertical stiffness data in the simulations. Car body vibration and dynamic wheel loads also tend to be affected by the stiffness variation. The proposed approach has limitations because stiffness estimates are made without direct measurements of wheel loads which leads to possible errors in the estimate. Also, the inadequacy of the Winkler model used in the process of stiffness estimation may also cause some inaccuracies. These limitations are further explored in this paper.",
author = "Sheng Lu and Haoliang Duan and Curt Greisen and Farritor, {Shane M} and Richard Arnold and Cory Hogan and Matthew Dick and Mahmood Fateh and Gary Carr",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1115/JRC2010-36124",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780791849071",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010",
pages = "145--154",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Case studies determining the effects of track stiffness on vehicle dynamics

AU - Lu, Sheng

AU - Duan, Haoliang

AU - Greisen, Curt

AU - Farritor, Shane M

AU - Arnold, Richard

AU - Hogan, Cory

AU - Dick, Matthew

AU - Fateh, Mahmood

AU - Carr, Gary

PY - 2010/11/5

Y1 - 2010/11/5

N2 - Vehicle/Track dynamic simulation programs are now used routinely in the rail industry in areas such as vehicle and track design, derailment investigation, and prediction of vehicle/track behavior under a variety of conditions. In these investigations the accuracy and validity of the simulation highly depends on information input into the program pertaining to both the vehicle and the track. Track geometry cars provide a variety of track measurements which are used to characterize the track (e.g. gage, cross level, profile, curvature, etc.) but these measurements do not include track stiffness information. For lack of better data these simulations generally assume constant track stiffness and this can lead to significant inaccuracy. The University of Nebraska (UNL), under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, has developed a method to estimate vertical track deflection and stiffness from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. The system has been tested on thousands of miles of track. It is believed that these vertical track stiffness estimates, along with the standard track geometry data can now be used to improve vehicle/track simulation results. In this paper, sites from recent testing of the University of Nebraska system were chosen to be studied with the vehicle dynamics software VAMPIRE®. These case studies demonstrate scenarios where the variation of track stiffness may significantly affect vehicle dynamics performance in different aspects. Results suggest that wheel unloading may be increased by up to 20% by the inclusion of vertical stiffness data in the simulations. Car body vibration and dynamic wheel loads also tend to be affected by the stiffness variation. The proposed approach has limitations because stiffness estimates are made without direct measurements of wheel loads which leads to possible errors in the estimate. Also, the inadequacy of the Winkler model used in the process of stiffness estimation may also cause some inaccuracies. These limitations are further explored in this paper.

AB - Vehicle/Track dynamic simulation programs are now used routinely in the rail industry in areas such as vehicle and track design, derailment investigation, and prediction of vehicle/track behavior under a variety of conditions. In these investigations the accuracy and validity of the simulation highly depends on information input into the program pertaining to both the vehicle and the track. Track geometry cars provide a variety of track measurements which are used to characterize the track (e.g. gage, cross level, profile, curvature, etc.) but these measurements do not include track stiffness information. For lack of better data these simulations generally assume constant track stiffness and this can lead to significant inaccuracy. The University of Nebraska (UNL), under sponsorship from the Federal Railroad Administration, has developed a method to estimate vertical track deflection and stiffness from a rail car traveling at revenue speed. The system has been tested on thousands of miles of track. It is believed that these vertical track stiffness estimates, along with the standard track geometry data can now be used to improve vehicle/track simulation results. In this paper, sites from recent testing of the University of Nebraska system were chosen to be studied with the vehicle dynamics software VAMPIRE®. These case studies demonstrate scenarios where the variation of track stiffness may significantly affect vehicle dynamics performance in different aspects. Results suggest that wheel unloading may be increased by up to 20% by the inclusion of vertical stiffness data in the simulations. Car body vibration and dynamic wheel loads also tend to be affected by the stiffness variation. The proposed approach has limitations because stiffness estimates are made without direct measurements of wheel loads which leads to possible errors in the estimate. Also, the inadequacy of the Winkler model used in the process of stiffness estimation may also cause some inaccuracies. These limitations are further explored in this paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049351633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049351633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/JRC2010-36124

DO - 10.1115/JRC2010-36124

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780791849071

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010

SP - 145

EP - 154

BT - Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, JRC2010

ER -