Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging: Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians

Roger Chou, Amir Qaseem, John Biebelhausen, Sanjay Desai, Lawrence Feinberg, Carrie A. Horwitch, Linda L. Humphrey, Robert M. McLean, Tanveer P. Mir, Darilyn V. Moyer, Kelley M. Skeff, Thomas Gerald Tape, Jeffrey Wiese

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cardiac screening in adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging can reveal findings associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease events, but inappropriate cardiac testing of low-risk adults has been identified as an important area of overuse by several professional societies. Methods: Narrative review based on published systematic reviews; guidelines; and articles on the yield, benefits, and harms of cardiac screening in low-risk adults. Results: Cardiac screening has not been shown to improve patient outcomes. It is also associated with potential harms due to false-positive results because they can lead to subsequent, potentially unnecessary tests and procedures. Cardiac screening is likely to be particularly inefficient in adults at low risk for coronary heart disease given the low prevalence and predictive values of testing in this population and the low likelihood that positive findings will affect treatment decisions. In this patient population, clinicians should focus on strategies for mitigating cardiovascular risk by treating modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight) and encouraging healthy levels of exercise. High-Value Care Advice: Clinicians should not screen for cardiac disease in asymptomatic, low-risk adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-447
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume162
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 17 2015

Fingerprint

Stress Echocardiography
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Electrocardiography
Physicians
Coronary Disease
Unnecessary Procedures
Hyperlipidemias
Population
Heart Diseases
Smoking
Guidelines
Exercise
Hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging : Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians. / Chou, Roger; Qaseem, Amir; Biebelhausen, John; Desai, Sanjay; Feinberg, Lawrence; Horwitch, Carrie A.; Humphrey, Linda L.; McLean, Robert M.; Mir, Tanveer P.; Moyer, Darilyn V.; Skeff, Kelley M.; Tape, Thomas Gerald; Wiese, Jeffrey.

In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 162, No. 6, 17.03.2015, p. 438-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Chou, R, Qaseem, A, Biebelhausen, J, Desai, S, Feinberg, L, Horwitch, CA, Humphrey, LL, McLean, RM, Mir, TP, Moyer, DV, Skeff, KM, Tape, TG & Wiese, J 2015, 'Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging: Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians', Annals of internal medicine, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 438-447. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1225
Chou, Roger ; Qaseem, Amir ; Biebelhausen, John ; Desai, Sanjay ; Feinberg, Lawrence ; Horwitch, Carrie A. ; Humphrey, Linda L. ; McLean, Robert M. ; Mir, Tanveer P. ; Moyer, Darilyn V. ; Skeff, Kelley M. ; Tape, Thomas Gerald ; Wiese, Jeffrey. / Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging : Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians. In: Annals of internal medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 162, No. 6. pp. 438-447.
@article{9a79f81d88ad417297790e2c22e37e94,
title = "Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging: Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians",
abstract = "Background: Cardiac screening in adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging can reveal findings associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease events, but inappropriate cardiac testing of low-risk adults has been identified as an important area of overuse by several professional societies. Methods: Narrative review based on published systematic reviews; guidelines; and articles on the yield, benefits, and harms of cardiac screening in low-risk adults. Results: Cardiac screening has not been shown to improve patient outcomes. It is also associated with potential harms due to false-positive results because they can lead to subsequent, potentially unnecessary tests and procedures. Cardiac screening is likely to be particularly inefficient in adults at low risk for coronary heart disease given the low prevalence and predictive values of testing in this population and the low likelihood that positive findings will affect treatment decisions. In this patient population, clinicians should focus on strategies for mitigating cardiovascular risk by treating modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight) and encouraging healthy levels of exercise. High-Value Care Advice: Clinicians should not screen for cardiac disease in asymptomatic, low-risk adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or stress myocardial perfusion imaging.",
author = "Roger Chou and Amir Qaseem and John Biebelhausen and Sanjay Desai and Lawrence Feinberg and Horwitch, {Carrie A.} and Humphrey, {Linda L.} and McLean, {Robert M.} and Mir, {Tanveer P.} and Moyer, {Darilyn V.} and Skeff, {Kelley M.} and Tape, {Thomas Gerald} and Jeffrey Wiese",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.7326/M14-1225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "438--447",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac screening with electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging

T2 - Advice for high-value care from the american college of physicians

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Qaseem, Amir

AU - Biebelhausen, John

AU - Desai, Sanjay

AU - Feinberg, Lawrence

AU - Horwitch, Carrie A.

AU - Humphrey, Linda L.

AU - McLean, Robert M.

AU - Mir, Tanveer P.

AU - Moyer, Darilyn V.

AU - Skeff, Kelley M.

AU - Tape, Thomas Gerald

AU - Wiese, Jeffrey

PY - 2015/3/17

Y1 - 2015/3/17

N2 - Background: Cardiac screening in adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging can reveal findings associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease events, but inappropriate cardiac testing of low-risk adults has been identified as an important area of overuse by several professional societies. Methods: Narrative review based on published systematic reviews; guidelines; and articles on the yield, benefits, and harms of cardiac screening in low-risk adults. Results: Cardiac screening has not been shown to improve patient outcomes. It is also associated with potential harms due to false-positive results because they can lead to subsequent, potentially unnecessary tests and procedures. Cardiac screening is likely to be particularly inefficient in adults at low risk for coronary heart disease given the low prevalence and predictive values of testing in this population and the low likelihood that positive findings will affect treatment decisions. In this patient population, clinicians should focus on strategies for mitigating cardiovascular risk by treating modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight) and encouraging healthy levels of exercise. High-Value Care Advice: Clinicians should not screen for cardiac disease in asymptomatic, low-risk adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

AB - Background: Cardiac screening in adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging can reveal findings associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease events, but inappropriate cardiac testing of low-risk adults has been identified as an important area of overuse by several professional societies. Methods: Narrative review based on published systematic reviews; guidelines; and articles on the yield, benefits, and harms of cardiac screening in low-risk adults. Results: Cardiac screening has not been shown to improve patient outcomes. It is also associated with potential harms due to false-positive results because they can lead to subsequent, potentially unnecessary tests and procedures. Cardiac screening is likely to be particularly inefficient in adults at low risk for coronary heart disease given the low prevalence and predictive values of testing in this population and the low likelihood that positive findings will affect treatment decisions. In this patient population, clinicians should focus on strategies for mitigating cardiovascular risk by treating modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight) and encouraging healthy levels of exercise. High-Value Care Advice: Clinicians should not screen for cardiac disease in asymptomatic, low-risk adults with resting or stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924905298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924905298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M14-1225

DO - 10.7326/M14-1225

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25775317

AN - SCOPUS:84924905298

VL - 162

SP - 438

EP - 447

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 6

ER -