Candidate genes and voter turnout: Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR

Kristen Diane Deppe, Scott F Stoltenberg, Kevin B. Smith, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently in this journal, Charney and English (2012) presented an extensive critique of candidate gene association studies using the widely noted Fowler and Dawes (2008) article on the relationship between self-reported voter turnout and both 5-HTT (serotonin transporter) and MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) as the driving example of their evaluation. Reanalysis of the Fowler and Dawes data by Charney and English, based on four critiques of candidate gene studies, led to the conclusion that neither polymorphism is related to variations in turnout. We add to this empirical debate by conducting an independent test using an original dataset containing 5-HTT data and two separate participation variables: self-reported participation and actual voting records. Our results confirm the original conclusions by Fowler and Dawes on 5-HTT, but also support several of the critiques suggested by Charney and English. We conclude by offering suggestions for the way candidate gene association studies should be interpreted by the discipline and processed by journal editors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-381
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume107
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

voter turnout
candidacy
evidence
participation
voting
editor
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Candidate genes and voter turnout : Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR. / Deppe, Kristen Diane; Stoltenberg, Scott F; Smith, Kevin B.; Hibbing, John R.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 107, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 375-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f49a20385e2c4af59d2431e4650730e0,
title = "Candidate genes and voter turnout: Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR",
abstract = "Recently in this journal, Charney and English (2012) presented an extensive critique of candidate gene association studies using the widely noted Fowler and Dawes (2008) article on the relationship between self-reported voter turnout and both 5-HTT (serotonin transporter) and MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) as the driving example of their evaluation. Reanalysis of the Fowler and Dawes data by Charney and English, based on four critiques of candidate gene studies, led to the conclusion that neither polymorphism is related to variations in turnout. We add to this empirical debate by conducting an independent test using an original dataset containing 5-HTT data and two separate participation variables: self-reported participation and actual voting records. Our results confirm the original conclusions by Fowler and Dawes on 5-HTT, but also support several of the critiques suggested by Charney and English. We conclude by offering suggestions for the way candidate gene association studies should be interpreted by the discipline and processed by journal editors.",
author = "Deppe, {Kristen Diane} and Stoltenberg, {Scott F} and Smith, {Kevin B.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S0003055413000087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "375--381",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Candidate genes and voter turnout

T2 - Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR

AU - Deppe, Kristen Diane

AU - Stoltenberg, Scott F

AU - Smith, Kevin B.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Recently in this journal, Charney and English (2012) presented an extensive critique of candidate gene association studies using the widely noted Fowler and Dawes (2008) article on the relationship between self-reported voter turnout and both 5-HTT (serotonin transporter) and MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) as the driving example of their evaluation. Reanalysis of the Fowler and Dawes data by Charney and English, based on four critiques of candidate gene studies, led to the conclusion that neither polymorphism is related to variations in turnout. We add to this empirical debate by conducting an independent test using an original dataset containing 5-HTT data and two separate participation variables: self-reported participation and actual voting records. Our results confirm the original conclusions by Fowler and Dawes on 5-HTT, but also support several of the critiques suggested by Charney and English. We conclude by offering suggestions for the way candidate gene association studies should be interpreted by the discipline and processed by journal editors.

AB - Recently in this journal, Charney and English (2012) presented an extensive critique of candidate gene association studies using the widely noted Fowler and Dawes (2008) article on the relationship between self-reported voter turnout and both 5-HTT (serotonin transporter) and MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) as the driving example of their evaluation. Reanalysis of the Fowler and Dawes data by Charney and English, based on four critiques of candidate gene studies, led to the conclusion that neither polymorphism is related to variations in turnout. We add to this empirical debate by conducting an independent test using an original dataset containing 5-HTT data and two separate participation variables: self-reported participation and actual voting records. Our results confirm the original conclusions by Fowler and Dawes on 5-HTT, but also support several of the critiques suggested by Charney and English. We conclude by offering suggestions for the way candidate gene association studies should be interpreted by the discipline and processed by journal editors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877971986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877971986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0003055413000087

DO - 10.1017/S0003055413000087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877971986

VL - 107

SP - 375

EP - 381

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 2

ER -