Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumour population

J. E. Talmadge, I. J. Fidler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from the primary tumour or from the selective growth of specialized subpopulations of cells having properties that allow them to complete the metastatic process is important to our understanding of tumour biology 1,2. Previous studies have provided indirect evidence that the process of metastasis favours the survival of cells having a metastatic phenotype(s)3-8. Direct evidence that the process is selective would be provided by the demonstration that cells populating spontaneous metastases are, in general, more metastatic than most of the parent tumour cells; some 9-11, but not all12,13, previous reports have failed to provide such evidence, suggesting that the process is random. These discrepancies could be due to differences in the biological characteristics of the various tumour systems studied and in the experimental conditions 14. In the present study, these variables were minimized by using three metastatic variant cell lines of the B16 melanoma. We report that, even in controlled conditions, the process of metastasis can appear as either selective or random depending on the nature of the initial population. Specifically, metastasis by the unselected, poorly metastatic parent B16 tumour was indeed selective. In contrast, metastasis by previously selected B16 lines appeared to be random.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-594
Number of pages2
JournalNature
Volume297
Issue number5867
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1982

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Metastasis
Population
Neoplasms
Cell Survival
Experimental Melanomas
Phenotype
Cell Line
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumour population. / Talmadge, J. E.; Fidler, I. J.

In: Nature, Vol. 297, No. 5867, 01.12.1982, p. 593-594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c244e4583c9840f29b83db591d66fe40,
title = "Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumour population",
abstract = "The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from the primary tumour or from the selective growth of specialized subpopulations of cells having properties that allow them to complete the metastatic process is important to our understanding of tumour biology 1,2. Previous studies have provided indirect evidence that the process of metastasis favours the survival of cells having a metastatic phenotype(s)3-8. Direct evidence that the process is selective would be provided by the demonstration that cells populating spontaneous metastases are, in general, more metastatic than most of the parent tumour cells; some 9-11, but not all12,13, previous reports have failed to provide such evidence, suggesting that the process is random. These discrepancies could be due to differences in the biological characteristics of the various tumour systems studied and in the experimental conditions 14. In the present study, these variables were minimized by using three metastatic variant cell lines of the B16 melanoma. We report that, even in controlled conditions, the process of metastasis can appear as either selective or random depending on the nature of the initial population. Specifically, metastasis by the unselected, poorly metastatic parent B16 tumour was indeed selective. In contrast, metastasis by previously selected B16 lines appeared to be random.",
author = "Talmadge, {J. E.} and Fidler, {I. J.}",
year = "1982",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/297593a0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "297",
pages = "593--594",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "5867",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumour population

AU - Talmadge, J. E.

AU - Fidler, I. J.

PY - 1982/12/1

Y1 - 1982/12/1

N2 - The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from the primary tumour or from the selective growth of specialized subpopulations of cells having properties that allow them to complete the metastatic process is important to our understanding of tumour biology 1,2. Previous studies have provided indirect evidence that the process of metastasis favours the survival of cells having a metastatic phenotype(s)3-8. Direct evidence that the process is selective would be provided by the demonstration that cells populating spontaneous metastases are, in general, more metastatic than most of the parent tumour cells; some 9-11, but not all12,13, previous reports have failed to provide such evidence, suggesting that the process is random. These discrepancies could be due to differences in the biological characteristics of the various tumour systems studied and in the experimental conditions 14. In the present study, these variables were minimized by using three metastatic variant cell lines of the B16 melanoma. We report that, even in controlled conditions, the process of metastasis can appear as either selective or random depending on the nature of the initial population. Specifically, metastasis by the unselected, poorly metastatic parent B16 tumour was indeed selective. In contrast, metastasis by previously selected B16 lines appeared to be random.

AB - The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from the primary tumour or from the selective growth of specialized subpopulations of cells having properties that allow them to complete the metastatic process is important to our understanding of tumour biology 1,2. Previous studies have provided indirect evidence that the process of metastasis favours the survival of cells having a metastatic phenotype(s)3-8. Direct evidence that the process is selective would be provided by the demonstration that cells populating spontaneous metastases are, in general, more metastatic than most of the parent tumour cells; some 9-11, but not all12,13, previous reports have failed to provide such evidence, suggesting that the process is random. These discrepancies could be due to differences in the biological characteristics of the various tumour systems studied and in the experimental conditions 14. In the present study, these variables were minimized by using three metastatic variant cell lines of the B16 melanoma. We report that, even in controlled conditions, the process of metastasis can appear as either selective or random depending on the nature of the initial population. Specifically, metastasis by the unselected, poorly metastatic parent B16 tumour was indeed selective. In contrast, metastasis by previously selected B16 lines appeared to be random.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020321214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020321214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/297593a0

DO - 10.1038/297593a0

M3 - Article

C2 - 7088144

AN - SCOPUS:0020321214

VL - 297

SP - 593

EP - 594

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 5867

ER -