Can SNOMED CT fulfill the vision of a compositional terminology? Analyzing the use case for problem list.

James R Campbell, Junchuan Xu, Kin Wah Fung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed 598 of 63,952 terms employed in problem list entries from seven major healthcare institutions that were not mapped with UMLS to SNOMED CT when preparing the NLM UMLS-CORE problem list subset. We intended to determine whether published or post-coordinated SNOMED concepts could accurately capture the problems as stated by the clinician and to characterize the workload for the local terminology manager. From the terms we analyzed, we estimate that 7.5% of the total terms represent ambiguous statements that require clarification. Of those terms which were unambiguous, we estimate that 38.1% could be encoded using the SNOMED CT January 2011 pre-coordinated (published core) content. 60.4% of unambiguous terms required post-coordination to capture the term meaning within the SNOMED model. Approximately 28.5% of post-coordinated content could not be fully defined and required primitive forms. This left 1.5% of unambiguous terms which were expressed with meaning which could not be represented in SNOMED CT. We estimate from our study that 98.5% of clinical terms unambiguously suggested for the problem list can be equated to published concepts or can be modeled with SNOMED CT but that roughly one in four SNOMED modeled expressions fail to represent the full meaning of the term. Implications for the business model of the local terminology manager and the development of SNOMED CT are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-188
Number of pages8
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Volume2011
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine
Terminology
Unified Medical Language System
Workload
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{f7a8a6e7b4b94b6eb119a489633e602c,
title = "Can SNOMED CT fulfill the vision of a compositional terminology? Analyzing the use case for problem list.",
abstract = "We analyzed 598 of 63,952 terms employed in problem list entries from seven major healthcare institutions that were not mapped with UMLS to SNOMED CT when preparing the NLM UMLS-CORE problem list subset. We intended to determine whether published or post-coordinated SNOMED concepts could accurately capture the problems as stated by the clinician and to characterize the workload for the local terminology manager. From the terms we analyzed, we estimate that 7.5{\%} of the total terms represent ambiguous statements that require clarification. Of those terms which were unambiguous, we estimate that 38.1{\%} could be encoded using the SNOMED CT January 2011 pre-coordinated (published core) content. 60.4{\%} of unambiguous terms required post-coordination to capture the term meaning within the SNOMED model. Approximately 28.5{\%} of post-coordinated content could not be fully defined and required primitive forms. This left 1.5{\%} of unambiguous terms which were expressed with meaning which could not be represented in SNOMED CT. We estimate from our study that 98.5{\%} of clinical terms unambiguously suggested for the problem list can be equated to published concepts or can be modeled with SNOMED CT but that roughly one in four SNOMED modeled expressions fail to represent the full meaning of the term. Implications for the business model of the local terminology manager and the development of SNOMED CT are discussed.",
author = "Campbell, {James R} and Junchuan Xu and Fung, {Kin Wah}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2011",
pages = "181--188",
journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1559-4076",
publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can SNOMED CT fulfill the vision of a compositional terminology? Analyzing the use case for problem list.

AU - Campbell, James R

AU - Xu, Junchuan

AU - Fung, Kin Wah

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We analyzed 598 of 63,952 terms employed in problem list entries from seven major healthcare institutions that were not mapped with UMLS to SNOMED CT when preparing the NLM UMLS-CORE problem list subset. We intended to determine whether published or post-coordinated SNOMED concepts could accurately capture the problems as stated by the clinician and to characterize the workload for the local terminology manager. From the terms we analyzed, we estimate that 7.5% of the total terms represent ambiguous statements that require clarification. Of those terms which were unambiguous, we estimate that 38.1% could be encoded using the SNOMED CT January 2011 pre-coordinated (published core) content. 60.4% of unambiguous terms required post-coordination to capture the term meaning within the SNOMED model. Approximately 28.5% of post-coordinated content could not be fully defined and required primitive forms. This left 1.5% of unambiguous terms which were expressed with meaning which could not be represented in SNOMED CT. We estimate from our study that 98.5% of clinical terms unambiguously suggested for the problem list can be equated to published concepts or can be modeled with SNOMED CT but that roughly one in four SNOMED modeled expressions fail to represent the full meaning of the term. Implications for the business model of the local terminology manager and the development of SNOMED CT are discussed.

AB - We analyzed 598 of 63,952 terms employed in problem list entries from seven major healthcare institutions that were not mapped with UMLS to SNOMED CT when preparing the NLM UMLS-CORE problem list subset. We intended to determine whether published or post-coordinated SNOMED concepts could accurately capture the problems as stated by the clinician and to characterize the workload for the local terminology manager. From the terms we analyzed, we estimate that 7.5% of the total terms represent ambiguous statements that require clarification. Of those terms which were unambiguous, we estimate that 38.1% could be encoded using the SNOMED CT January 2011 pre-coordinated (published core) content. 60.4% of unambiguous terms required post-coordination to capture the term meaning within the SNOMED model. Approximately 28.5% of post-coordinated content could not be fully defined and required primitive forms. This left 1.5% of unambiguous terms which were expressed with meaning which could not be represented in SNOMED CT. We estimate from our study that 98.5% of clinical terms unambiguously suggested for the problem list can be equated to published concepts or can be modeled with SNOMED CT but that roughly one in four SNOMED modeled expressions fail to represent the full meaning of the term. Implications for the business model of the local terminology manager and the development of SNOMED CT are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874210895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874210895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22195069

AN - SCOPUS:84874210895

VL - 2011

SP - 181

EP - 188

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -