Can continuity-of-care requirements for surgery residents be demonstrated in the current teaching environment?

Cheryl I. Anderson, Richard R. Albrecht, Kimberly D Schenarts, Richard E. Dean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1994, the Residency Review Committee in Surgery began evaluating the ability of programs to provide adequate continuity-of-care experiences to residents, based on 6 criteria requiring resident participation in each phase of a surgical patient's care. The Residency Review Committee document further described resident and patient experiences as being synonymous. No previous studies were found that examined the 6 criteria or compared them with the patient's experience with continuity. Study objectives were 2-fold: (1) to assess the 6 required continuity-of-care experiences provided to general surgery residents and (2) to compare resident experiences to the patient's experience with continuity. Surgery residents from 2 academic years, representing each postgraduate year, were studied. Patients had (1) undergone an operation involving a resident and (2) remained hospitalized for longer than 24 hours but less than 10 days. Data were collected from a retrospective randomized review of each patient's medical records. Of the 114 cases, 23.7% showed that the same resident participated in all phases of care. In the remaining cases, residents provided preoperative care in 70.2%, directed the postoperative hospitalized care in 86.8%, and provided postdischarge care in 37.7%. Patients saw an average±SD of 4.6±1.5 surgical providers during the entire course of their surgical care. In conclusion, continuity experiences were provided to surgery residents in varying quantities and combinations, with one quarter of the residents experiencing 'perfect continuity.' Resident continuity experiences and patient continuity were not synonymous. Although improved medical record documentation may have enhanced these results, continuity-of-care remains difficult to demonstrate in view of the current surgery teaching environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)915-922
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume131
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Continuity of Patient Care
Teaching
Advisory Committees
Internship and Residency
Medical Records
Preoperative Care
Postoperative Care
Documentation
Patient Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Can continuity-of-care requirements for surgery residents be demonstrated in the current teaching environment? / Anderson, Cheryl I.; Albrecht, Richard R.; Schenarts, Kimberly D; Dean, Richard E.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 9, 01.01.1996, p. 915-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, Cheryl I. ; Albrecht, Richard R. ; Schenarts, Kimberly D ; Dean, Richard E. / Can continuity-of-care requirements for surgery residents be demonstrated in the current teaching environment?. In: Archives of Surgery. 1996 ; Vol. 131, No. 9. pp. 915-922.
@article{7e634467325849218015eafdc34a6a96,
title = "Can continuity-of-care requirements for surgery residents be demonstrated in the current teaching environment?",
abstract = "In 1994, the Residency Review Committee in Surgery began evaluating the ability of programs to provide adequate continuity-of-care experiences to residents, based on 6 criteria requiring resident participation in each phase of a surgical patient's care. The Residency Review Committee document further described resident and patient experiences as being synonymous. No previous studies were found that examined the 6 criteria or compared them with the patient's experience with continuity. Study objectives were 2-fold: (1) to assess the 6 required continuity-of-care experiences provided to general surgery residents and (2) to compare resident experiences to the patient's experience with continuity. Surgery residents from 2 academic years, representing each postgraduate year, were studied. Patients had (1) undergone an operation involving a resident and (2) remained hospitalized for longer than 24 hours but less than 10 days. Data were collected from a retrospective randomized review of each patient's medical records. Of the 114 cases, 23.7{\%} showed that the same resident participated in all phases of care. In the remaining cases, residents provided preoperative care in 70.2{\%}, directed the postoperative hospitalized care in 86.8{\%}, and provided postdischarge care in 37.7{\%}. Patients saw an average±SD of 4.6±1.5 surgical providers during the entire course of their surgical care. In conclusion, continuity experiences were provided to surgery residents in varying quantities and combinations, with one quarter of the residents experiencing 'perfect continuity.' Resident continuity experiences and patient continuity were not synonymous. Although improved medical record documentation may have enhanced these results, continuity-of-care remains difficult to demonstrate in view of the current surgery teaching environment.",
author = "Anderson, {Cheryl I.} and Albrecht, {Richard R.} and Schenarts, {Kimberly D} and Dean, {Richard E.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210013002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "915--922",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can continuity-of-care requirements for surgery residents be demonstrated in the current teaching environment?

AU - Anderson, Cheryl I.

AU - Albrecht, Richard R.

AU - Schenarts, Kimberly D

AU - Dean, Richard E.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - In 1994, the Residency Review Committee in Surgery began evaluating the ability of programs to provide adequate continuity-of-care experiences to residents, based on 6 criteria requiring resident participation in each phase of a surgical patient's care. The Residency Review Committee document further described resident and patient experiences as being synonymous. No previous studies were found that examined the 6 criteria or compared them with the patient's experience with continuity. Study objectives were 2-fold: (1) to assess the 6 required continuity-of-care experiences provided to general surgery residents and (2) to compare resident experiences to the patient's experience with continuity. Surgery residents from 2 academic years, representing each postgraduate year, were studied. Patients had (1) undergone an operation involving a resident and (2) remained hospitalized for longer than 24 hours but less than 10 days. Data were collected from a retrospective randomized review of each patient's medical records. Of the 114 cases, 23.7% showed that the same resident participated in all phases of care. In the remaining cases, residents provided preoperative care in 70.2%, directed the postoperative hospitalized care in 86.8%, and provided postdischarge care in 37.7%. Patients saw an average±SD of 4.6±1.5 surgical providers during the entire course of their surgical care. In conclusion, continuity experiences were provided to surgery residents in varying quantities and combinations, with one quarter of the residents experiencing 'perfect continuity.' Resident continuity experiences and patient continuity were not synonymous. Although improved medical record documentation may have enhanced these results, continuity-of-care remains difficult to demonstrate in view of the current surgery teaching environment.

AB - In 1994, the Residency Review Committee in Surgery began evaluating the ability of programs to provide adequate continuity-of-care experiences to residents, based on 6 criteria requiring resident participation in each phase of a surgical patient's care. The Residency Review Committee document further described resident and patient experiences as being synonymous. No previous studies were found that examined the 6 criteria or compared them with the patient's experience with continuity. Study objectives were 2-fold: (1) to assess the 6 required continuity-of-care experiences provided to general surgery residents and (2) to compare resident experiences to the patient's experience with continuity. Surgery residents from 2 academic years, representing each postgraduate year, were studied. Patients had (1) undergone an operation involving a resident and (2) remained hospitalized for longer than 24 hours but less than 10 days. Data were collected from a retrospective randomized review of each patient's medical records. Of the 114 cases, 23.7% showed that the same resident participated in all phases of care. In the remaining cases, residents provided preoperative care in 70.2%, directed the postoperative hospitalized care in 86.8%, and provided postdischarge care in 37.7%. Patients saw an average±SD of 4.6±1.5 surgical providers during the entire course of their surgical care. In conclusion, continuity experiences were provided to surgery residents in varying quantities and combinations, with one quarter of the residents experiencing 'perfect continuity.' Resident continuity experiences and patient continuity were not synonymous. Although improved medical record documentation may have enhanced these results, continuity-of-care remains difficult to demonstrate in view of the current surgery teaching environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029743052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029743052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210013002

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210013002

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 915

EP - 922

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -