Broadening campus threat assessment beyond mass shootings

Brandon A. Hollister, Mario J Scalora

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Record reviews of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threateners and attackers displayed the importance of noticing pre-incident behaviors and intervening to prevent violence. General crime prevention strategies did not appear applicable. Similarly, campus threat assessment research has considered targeted violence as distinctive and unable to be reviewed within general collegiate samples, which has related to questions about the prevalence, predictiveness, applicability, and reporting of pre-incident behaviors. This article applies general criminological and crime prevention findings to these questions and presents campus threat assessment methodologies informed by these fields. With college student surveys, pre-incident behaviors have appeared predictive of general physical assault, which promotes investigation of the generalizability of campus threat assessment across collegiate bullying, intimate partner, stalking, and workplace violence concerns. In college student surveys, the majority of observed pre-incident behavior has not been reported to campus authorities and has been impacted by students' personal victimization, assessment of dangerousness, and relationship with the perpetrator. Efforts to enhance reporting in general criminological and crime prevention fields could be applied to improving pre-incident authority notification. Thus, viewing campus threat assessment within the broader violence prevention framework can advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and applicability of the approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-53
Number of pages11
JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
Volume25
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Crime
Violence
Students
Stalking
Workplace Violence
Dangerous Behavior
Bullying
Crime Victims
Risk Management
Workplace
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Campus targeted violence
  • Campus threat assessment
  • Pre-incident behavior
  • Violence prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Broadening campus threat assessment beyond mass shootings. / Hollister, Brandon A.; Scalora, Mario J.

In: Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 25, 11.2015, p. 43-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{34f99b6aa6ba44fcafedcd76d98f6484,
title = "Broadening campus threat assessment beyond mass shootings",
abstract = "Record reviews of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threateners and attackers displayed the importance of noticing pre-incident behaviors and intervening to prevent violence. General crime prevention strategies did not appear applicable. Similarly, campus threat assessment research has considered targeted violence as distinctive and unable to be reviewed within general collegiate samples, which has related to questions about the prevalence, predictiveness, applicability, and reporting of pre-incident behaviors. This article applies general criminological and crime prevention findings to these questions and presents campus threat assessment methodologies informed by these fields. With college student surveys, pre-incident behaviors have appeared predictive of general physical assault, which promotes investigation of the generalizability of campus threat assessment across collegiate bullying, intimate partner, stalking, and workplace violence concerns. In college student surveys, the majority of observed pre-incident behavior has not been reported to campus authorities and has been impacted by students' personal victimization, assessment of dangerousness, and relationship with the perpetrator. Efforts to enhance reporting in general criminological and crime prevention fields could be applied to improving pre-incident authority notification. Thus, viewing campus threat assessment within the broader violence prevention framework can advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and applicability of the approach.",
keywords = "Campus targeted violence, Campus threat assessment, Pre-incident behavior, Violence prevention",
author = "Hollister, {Brandon A.} and Scalora, {Mario J}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "43--53",
journal = "Aggression and Violent Behavior",
issn = "1359-1789",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening campus threat assessment beyond mass shootings

AU - Hollister, Brandon A.

AU - Scalora, Mario J

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Record reviews of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threateners and attackers displayed the importance of noticing pre-incident behaviors and intervening to prevent violence. General crime prevention strategies did not appear applicable. Similarly, campus threat assessment research has considered targeted violence as distinctive and unable to be reviewed within general collegiate samples, which has related to questions about the prevalence, predictiveness, applicability, and reporting of pre-incident behaviors. This article applies general criminological and crime prevention findings to these questions and presents campus threat assessment methodologies informed by these fields. With college student surveys, pre-incident behaviors have appeared predictive of general physical assault, which promotes investigation of the generalizability of campus threat assessment across collegiate bullying, intimate partner, stalking, and workplace violence concerns. In college student surveys, the majority of observed pre-incident behavior has not been reported to campus authorities and has been impacted by students' personal victimization, assessment of dangerousness, and relationship with the perpetrator. Efforts to enhance reporting in general criminological and crime prevention fields could be applied to improving pre-incident authority notification. Thus, viewing campus threat assessment within the broader violence prevention framework can advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and applicability of the approach.

AB - Record reviews of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threateners and attackers displayed the importance of noticing pre-incident behaviors and intervening to prevent violence. General crime prevention strategies did not appear applicable. Similarly, campus threat assessment research has considered targeted violence as distinctive and unable to be reviewed within general collegiate samples, which has related to questions about the prevalence, predictiveness, applicability, and reporting of pre-incident behaviors. This article applies general criminological and crime prevention findings to these questions and presents campus threat assessment methodologies informed by these fields. With college student surveys, pre-incident behaviors have appeared predictive of general physical assault, which promotes investigation of the generalizability of campus threat assessment across collegiate bullying, intimate partner, stalking, and workplace violence concerns. In college student surveys, the majority of observed pre-incident behavior has not been reported to campus authorities and has been impacted by students' personal victimization, assessment of dangerousness, and relationship with the perpetrator. Efforts to enhance reporting in general criminological and crime prevention fields could be applied to improving pre-incident authority notification. Thus, viewing campus threat assessment within the broader violence prevention framework can advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and applicability of the approach.

KW - Campus targeted violence

KW - Campus threat assessment

KW - Pre-incident behavior

KW - Violence prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947494806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947494806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.005

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84947494806

VL - 25

SP - 43

EP - 53

JO - Aggression and Violent Behavior

JF - Aggression and Violent Behavior

SN - 1359-1789

ER -