BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues

Harma Meffert, Soonjo Hwang, Zachary T. Nolan, Gang Chen, James R. Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also "Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control" [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-70
Number of pages5
JournalData in Brief
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

activation
brain
stimulus
interaction

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • FMRI
  • Generalized psychophysiological interactions
  • Go/No-go
  • Inhibition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues. / Meffert, Harma; Hwang, Soonjo; Nolan, Zachary T.; Chen, Gang; Blair, James R.

In: Data in Brief, Vol. 7, 01.06.2016, p. 66-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{56d05f9d76b14ea88f558e1944e1f34b,
title = "BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues",
abstract = "The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75{\%} go, 25{\%} no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25{\%} go, 75{\%} no-go); see also {"}Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control{"} [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition.",
keywords = "Cognitive control, FMRI, Generalized psychophysiological interactions, Go/No-go, Inhibition",
author = "Harma Meffert and Soonjo Hwang and Nolan, {Zachary T.} and Gang Chen and Blair, {James R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "66--70",
journal = "Data in Brief",
issn = "2352-3409",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues

AU - Meffert, Harma

AU - Hwang, Soonjo

AU - Nolan, Zachary T.

AU - Chen, Gang

AU - Blair, James R.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also "Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control" [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition.

AB - The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also "Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control" [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition.

KW - Cognitive control

KW - FMRI

KW - Generalized psychophysiological interactions

KW - Go/No-go

KW - Inhibition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958581839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958581839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 26955650

AN - SCOPUS:84958581839

VL - 7

SP - 66

EP - 70

JO - Data in Brief

JF - Data in Brief

SN - 2352-3409

ER -