Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies

Philippe Bernard, Sarah Gervais, Jill Allen, Sophie Campomizzi, Olivier Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent study showed that people rely on piecemeal, analytic processing when viewing sexualized female (vs. male) bodies, suggesting that people perceived sexualized female bodies similarly to objects. This paper will examine whether cognitive objectification of sexualized female bodies is associated with a focus on women's body parts rather than on their whole bodies. In order to test our assertion, we asked participants to view photographs of sexual body parts or entire bodies of males and females and make recognition judgments. We predicted an interaction between target sex and recognition task, with better recognition of sexualized female body parts when presented in isolation than in the context of whole female bodies whereas we expected the opposite pattern for sexualized male bodies recognition. As hypothesized, people recognized female body parts better than their whole bodies. Nonetheless, male whole bodies were not recognized better than male body parts. Furthermore, we hypothesized that self-objectification would be correlated with body-recognition and correlational analyses revealed that more selfobjectification was related to less whole body recognition and this tendency was more pronounced for female targets. By contrast, we did not find a positive link between selfobjectification and sexual body parts recognition. Implications for objectification theory and directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-61
Number of pages23
JournalRevue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Human Body
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Analytic processing
  • Configural processing
  • Local and global
  • Self-objectification
  • Sexual objectification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies. / Bernard, Philippe; Gervais, Sarah; Allen, Jill; Campomizzi, Sophie; Klein, Olivier.

In: Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 39-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Bernard, Philippe ; Gervais, Sarah ; Allen, Jill ; Campomizzi, Sophie ; Klein, Olivier. / Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies. In: Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 39-61.
@article{d6e973844fa842cf8167eac1c475fc81,
title = "Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies",
abstract = "A recent study showed that people rely on piecemeal, analytic processing when viewing sexualized female (vs. male) bodies, suggesting that people perceived sexualized female bodies similarly to objects. This paper will examine whether cognitive objectification of sexualized female bodies is associated with a focus on women's body parts rather than on their whole bodies. In order to test our assertion, we asked participants to view photographs of sexual body parts or entire bodies of males and females and make recognition judgments. We predicted an interaction between target sex and recognition task, with better recognition of sexualized female body parts when presented in isolation than in the context of whole female bodies whereas we expected the opposite pattern for sexualized male bodies recognition. As hypothesized, people recognized female body parts better than their whole bodies. Nonetheless, male whole bodies were not recognized better than male body parts. Furthermore, we hypothesized that self-objectification would be correlated with body-recognition and correlational analyses revealed that more selfobjectification was related to less whole body recognition and this tendency was more pronounced for female targets. By contrast, we did not find a positive link between selfobjectification and sexual body parts recognition. Implications for objectification theory and directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Analytic processing, Configural processing, Local and global, Self-objectification, Sexual objectification",
author = "Philippe Bernard and Sarah Gervais and Jill Allen and Sophie Campomizzi and Olivier Klein",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "39--61",
journal = "International Review of Social Psychology",
issn = "0992-986X",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body parts reduction and self-objectification in the objectification of sexualized bodies

AU - Bernard, Philippe

AU - Gervais, Sarah

AU - Allen, Jill

AU - Campomizzi, Sophie

AU - Klein, Olivier

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - A recent study showed that people rely on piecemeal, analytic processing when viewing sexualized female (vs. male) bodies, suggesting that people perceived sexualized female bodies similarly to objects. This paper will examine whether cognitive objectification of sexualized female bodies is associated with a focus on women's body parts rather than on their whole bodies. In order to test our assertion, we asked participants to view photographs of sexual body parts or entire bodies of males and females and make recognition judgments. We predicted an interaction between target sex and recognition task, with better recognition of sexualized female body parts when presented in isolation than in the context of whole female bodies whereas we expected the opposite pattern for sexualized male bodies recognition. As hypothesized, people recognized female body parts better than their whole bodies. Nonetheless, male whole bodies were not recognized better than male body parts. Furthermore, we hypothesized that self-objectification would be correlated with body-recognition and correlational analyses revealed that more selfobjectification was related to less whole body recognition and this tendency was more pronounced for female targets. By contrast, we did not find a positive link between selfobjectification and sexual body parts recognition. Implications for objectification theory and directions for future research are discussed.

AB - A recent study showed that people rely on piecemeal, analytic processing when viewing sexualized female (vs. male) bodies, suggesting that people perceived sexualized female bodies similarly to objects. This paper will examine whether cognitive objectification of sexualized female bodies is associated with a focus on women's body parts rather than on their whole bodies. In order to test our assertion, we asked participants to view photographs of sexual body parts or entire bodies of males and females and make recognition judgments. We predicted an interaction between target sex and recognition task, with better recognition of sexualized female body parts when presented in isolation than in the context of whole female bodies whereas we expected the opposite pattern for sexualized male bodies recognition. As hypothesized, people recognized female body parts better than their whole bodies. Nonetheless, male whole bodies were not recognized better than male body parts. Furthermore, we hypothesized that self-objectification would be correlated with body-recognition and correlational analyses revealed that more selfobjectification was related to less whole body recognition and this tendency was more pronounced for female targets. By contrast, we did not find a positive link between selfobjectification and sexual body parts recognition. Implications for objectification theory and directions for future research are discussed.

KW - Analytic processing

KW - Configural processing

KW - Local and global

KW - Self-objectification

KW - Sexual objectification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018119742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018119742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85018119742

VL - 28

SP - 39

EP - 61

JO - International Review of Social Psychology

JF - International Review of Social Psychology

SN - 0992-986X

IS - 1

ER -