Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction

Mohammad Nahid Andalib, Yuris Dzenis, Henry J. Donahue, Jung Y Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number11
JournalBiomaterials Research
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cellular Mechanotransduction
Biomimetics
Cues
Substrates
Cell adhesion
Tissue engineering
Cell culture
Regenerative Medicine
Surface treatment
Tissue Engineering
Cell Adhesion
Cell Culture Techniques
Fluids

Keywords

  • Biomimetic substrate
  • Functional tissue engineering
  • Mechanical stimulation
  • Mechanotransduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction. / Andalib, Mohammad Nahid; Dzenis, Yuris; Donahue, Henry J.; Lim, Jung Y.

In: Biomaterials Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, 11, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Andalib, Mohammad Nahid ; Dzenis, Yuris ; Donahue, Henry J. ; Lim, Jung Y. / Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction. In: Biomaterials Research. 2016 ; Vol. 20, No. 1.
@article{bc4740d7e8a64ba882797718f3fb449f,
title = "Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction",
abstract = "Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols.",
keywords = "Biomimetic substrate, Functional tissue engineering, Mechanical stimulation, Mechanotransduction",
author = "Andalib, {Mohammad Nahid} and Yuris Dzenis and Donahue, {Henry J.} and Lim, {Jung Y}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Biomaterials Research",
issn = "2055-7124",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction

AU - Andalib, Mohammad Nahid

AU - Dzenis, Yuris

AU - Donahue, Henry J.

AU - Lim, Jung Y

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols.

AB - Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols.

KW - Biomimetic substrate

KW - Functional tissue engineering

KW - Mechanical stimulation

KW - Mechanotransduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982709015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982709015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1

DO - 10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1

M3 - Review article

VL - 20

JO - Biomaterials Research

JF - Biomaterials Research

SN - 2055-7124

IS - 1

M1 - 11

ER -