Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model

Stefani C. Fontana, Russell B. Smith, Niaman Nazir, Brian T. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background A variety of plating techniques are employed by microsurgeons to provide rigid fixation for vascularized bone constructs of the mandible. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare three commonly utilized plating techniques for rigid fixation of fibula bone flaps in reconstructing lateral segmental mandibular defects. Materials and Methods Polyurethane mandibles with 3-cm segmental defects were reconstructed using polyurethane fibula models. Three fixation techniques were compared (n = 5 models per group): Group 1 used two 2.0-mm miniplates at each osteotomy site, Group 2 used a single 2.3-mm plate, and Group 3 used a single 2.7-mm plate. Biomechanical testing of maximum force and displacement at failure for each plating technique was assessed and statistical comparison performed. Results The average displacement for Group 1 was 14.08 ± 1.42 mm, Group 2 was 5.79 ± 0.89 mm, and Group 3 was 6.03 ± 1.59 mm. Group 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) displacement when compared with Group 2 and 3. Analysis of variance demonstrated the three groups varied significantly in mean displacement (0 < 0.01). The average force before failure for Group 1 was 616.4 ± 33.83N, Group 2 was 737.8 ± 72.57N, and Group 3 was 681.0 ± 67.98N. Group 2 withstood significantly greater force than Group 1 (P < 0.05), and withstood greater force than Group 3, although the difference was not significant. Analysis of variance showed the three groups varied significantly in mean force at failure (P < 0.05). Conclusion Reconstruction using a single 2.3-mm plate provided the best rigid fixation for lateral segmental defects of the mandible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-333
Number of pages4
JournalMicrosurgery
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Fibula
Polyurethanes
Mandible
Analysis of Variance
Bone and Bones
Osteotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model. / Fontana, Stefani C.; Smith, Russell B.; Nazir, Niaman; Andrews, Brian T.

In: Microsurgery, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.05.2016, p. 330-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fontana, Stefani C. ; Smith, Russell B. ; Nazir, Niaman ; Andrews, Brian T. / Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model. In: Microsurgery. 2016 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 330-333.
@article{9b974944f7664d888b46ee0d34150aff,
title = "Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model",
abstract = "Background A variety of plating techniques are employed by microsurgeons to provide rigid fixation for vascularized bone constructs of the mandible. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare three commonly utilized plating techniques for rigid fixation of fibula bone flaps in reconstructing lateral segmental mandibular defects. Materials and Methods Polyurethane mandibles with 3-cm segmental defects were reconstructed using polyurethane fibula models. Three fixation techniques were compared (n = 5 models per group): Group 1 used two 2.0-mm miniplates at each osteotomy site, Group 2 used a single 2.3-mm plate, and Group 3 used a single 2.7-mm plate. Biomechanical testing of maximum force and displacement at failure for each plating technique was assessed and statistical comparison performed. Results The average displacement for Group 1 was 14.08 ± 1.42 mm, Group 2 was 5.79 ± 0.89 mm, and Group 3 was 6.03 ± 1.59 mm. Group 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) displacement when compared with Group 2 and 3. Analysis of variance demonstrated the three groups varied significantly in mean displacement (0 < 0.01). The average force before failure for Group 1 was 616.4 ± 33.83N, Group 2 was 737.8 ± 72.57N, and Group 3 was 681.0 ± 67.98N. Group 2 withstood significantly greater force than Group 1 (P < 0.05), and withstood greater force than Group 3, although the difference was not significant. Analysis of variance showed the three groups varied significantly in mean force at failure (P < 0.05). Conclusion Reconstruction using a single 2.3-mm plate provided the best rigid fixation for lateral segmental defects of the mandible.",
author = "Fontana, {Stefani C.} and Smith, {Russell B.} and Niaman Nazir and Andrews, {Brian T.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/micr.30052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "330--333",
journal = "Microsurgery",
issn = "0738-1085",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical assessment of fixation methods for segmental mandible reconstruction with fibula in the polyurethane model

AU - Fontana, Stefani C.

AU - Smith, Russell B.

AU - Nazir, Niaman

AU - Andrews, Brian T.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background A variety of plating techniques are employed by microsurgeons to provide rigid fixation for vascularized bone constructs of the mandible. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare three commonly utilized plating techniques for rigid fixation of fibula bone flaps in reconstructing lateral segmental mandibular defects. Materials and Methods Polyurethane mandibles with 3-cm segmental defects were reconstructed using polyurethane fibula models. Three fixation techniques were compared (n = 5 models per group): Group 1 used two 2.0-mm miniplates at each osteotomy site, Group 2 used a single 2.3-mm plate, and Group 3 used a single 2.7-mm plate. Biomechanical testing of maximum force and displacement at failure for each plating technique was assessed and statistical comparison performed. Results The average displacement for Group 1 was 14.08 ± 1.42 mm, Group 2 was 5.79 ± 0.89 mm, and Group 3 was 6.03 ± 1.59 mm. Group 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) displacement when compared with Group 2 and 3. Analysis of variance demonstrated the three groups varied significantly in mean displacement (0 < 0.01). The average force before failure for Group 1 was 616.4 ± 33.83N, Group 2 was 737.8 ± 72.57N, and Group 3 was 681.0 ± 67.98N. Group 2 withstood significantly greater force than Group 1 (P < 0.05), and withstood greater force than Group 3, although the difference was not significant. Analysis of variance showed the three groups varied significantly in mean force at failure (P < 0.05). Conclusion Reconstruction using a single 2.3-mm plate provided the best rigid fixation for lateral segmental defects of the mandible.

AB - Background A variety of plating techniques are employed by microsurgeons to provide rigid fixation for vascularized bone constructs of the mandible. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare three commonly utilized plating techniques for rigid fixation of fibula bone flaps in reconstructing lateral segmental mandibular defects. Materials and Methods Polyurethane mandibles with 3-cm segmental defects were reconstructed using polyurethane fibula models. Three fixation techniques were compared (n = 5 models per group): Group 1 used two 2.0-mm miniplates at each osteotomy site, Group 2 used a single 2.3-mm plate, and Group 3 used a single 2.7-mm plate. Biomechanical testing of maximum force and displacement at failure for each plating technique was assessed and statistical comparison performed. Results The average displacement for Group 1 was 14.08 ± 1.42 mm, Group 2 was 5.79 ± 0.89 mm, and Group 3 was 6.03 ± 1.59 mm. Group 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) displacement when compared with Group 2 and 3. Analysis of variance demonstrated the three groups varied significantly in mean displacement (0 < 0.01). The average force before failure for Group 1 was 616.4 ± 33.83N, Group 2 was 737.8 ± 72.57N, and Group 3 was 681.0 ± 67.98N. Group 2 withstood significantly greater force than Group 1 (P < 0.05), and withstood greater force than Group 3, although the difference was not significant. Analysis of variance showed the three groups varied significantly in mean force at failure (P < 0.05). Conclusion Reconstruction using a single 2.3-mm plate provided the best rigid fixation for lateral segmental defects of the mandible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962783656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962783656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/micr.30052

DO - 10.1002/micr.30052

M3 - Article

C2 - 27059150

AN - SCOPUS:84962783656

VL - 36

SP - 330

EP - 333

JO - Microsurgery

JF - Microsurgery

SN - 0738-1085

IS - 4

ER -