Biological warfare: A historical perspective

George W. Christopher, Theodore J. Cieslak, Julie A. Pavlin, Edward M. Eitzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

462 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-417
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume278
Issue number5
StatePublished - Aug 6 1997

Fingerprint

Biological Warfare
Biological Warfare Agents
Weapons
History
Propaganda
Hostility
Water Supply
Biological Factors
Microbiology
Aerosols
Cadaver
Fermentation
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Christopher, G. W., Cieslak, T. J., Pavlin, J. A., & Eitzen, E. M. (1997). Biological warfare: A historical perspective. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(5), 412-417.

Biological warfare : A historical perspective. / Christopher, George W.; Cieslak, Theodore J.; Pavlin, Julie A.; Eitzen, Edward M.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 278, No. 5, 06.08.1997, p. 412-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Christopher, GW, Cieslak, TJ, Pavlin, JA & Eitzen, EM 1997, 'Biological warfare: A historical perspective', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 278, no. 5, pp. 412-417.
Christopher GW, Cieslak TJ, Pavlin JA, Eitzen EM. Biological warfare: A historical perspective. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):412-417.
Christopher, George W. ; Cieslak, Theodore J. ; Pavlin, Julie A. ; Eitzen, Edward M. / Biological warfare : A historical perspective. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997 ; Vol. 278, No. 5. pp. 412-417.
@article{135431c3253c4af48837ad8bd75f7501,
title = "Biological warfare: A historical perspective",
abstract = "The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.",
author = "Christopher, {George W.} and Cieslak, {Theodore J.} and Pavlin, {Julie A.} and Eitzen, {Edward M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
day = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "278",
pages = "412--417",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological warfare

T2 - A historical perspective

AU - Christopher, George W.

AU - Cieslak, Theodore J.

AU - Pavlin, Julie A.

AU - Eitzen, Edward M.

PY - 1997/8/6

Y1 - 1997/8/6

N2 - The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.

AB - The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030872063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030872063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9244333

AN - SCOPUS:0030872063

VL - 278

SP - 412

EP - 417

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 5

ER -