Biodiversity Comparison among Phylogenetic Diversity Metrics and between Three North American Prairies

P. Roxanne Kellar, Dakota L. Ahrendsen, Shelly K. Aust, Amanda R. Jones, J. Chris Pires

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protection of Earth's ecosystems requires identification of geographical areas of greatest biodiversity. Assessment of biodiversity begins with knowledge of the evolutionary histories of species in a geographic area. Multiple phylogenetic diversity (PD) metrics have been developed to describe biodiversity beyond species counts, but sufficient empirical studies, particularly at fine phylogenetic scales, have not been conducted to provide conservation planners with evidence for incorporating PD metrics into selection of priority regions. We review notable studies that are contributing to a growing database of empirical results, we report on the effect of using high-throughput sequencing to estimate the phylogenies used to calculate PD metrics, and we discuss difficulties in selecting appropriate diversity indices. We focused on two of the most speciose angiosperm families in prairies-Asteraceae and Fabaceae-and compared 12 PD metrics and four traditional measures of biodiversity between three North American prairie sites. The varying results from the literature and from the current data reveal the wide range of applications of PD metrics and the necessity for many more empirical studies. The accumulation of results from further investigations will eventually lead to a scientific understanding upon which conservation planners can make informed decisions about where to apply limited preservation funds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8
JournalApplications in Plant Sciences
Volume3
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

prairies
prairie
biodiversity
phylogenetics
phylogeny
diversity index
angiosperm
comparison
Fabaceae
Asteraceae
Angiospermae
ecosystem
history
ecosystems

Keywords

  • Asteraceae
  • Fabaceae
  • angiosperms
  • biodiversity assessment
  • conservation prioritization
  • next-generation sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Biodiversity Comparison among Phylogenetic Diversity Metrics and between Three North American Prairies. / Roxanne Kellar, P.; Ahrendsen, Dakota L.; Aust, Shelly K.; Jones, Amanda R.; Pires, J. Chris.

In: Applications in Plant Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 7, 8, 01.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Roxanne Kellar, P. ; Ahrendsen, Dakota L. ; Aust, Shelly K. ; Jones, Amanda R. ; Pires, J. Chris. / Biodiversity Comparison among Phylogenetic Diversity Metrics and between Three North American Prairies. In: Applications in Plant Sciences. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 7.
@article{ec6228c46f7142fab9010a84851bb75e,
title = "Biodiversity Comparison among Phylogenetic Diversity Metrics and between Three North American Prairies",
abstract = "Protection of Earth's ecosystems requires identification of geographical areas of greatest biodiversity. Assessment of biodiversity begins with knowledge of the evolutionary histories of species in a geographic area. Multiple phylogenetic diversity (PD) metrics have been developed to describe biodiversity beyond species counts, but sufficient empirical studies, particularly at fine phylogenetic scales, have not been conducted to provide conservation planners with evidence for incorporating PD metrics into selection of priority regions. We review notable studies that are contributing to a growing database of empirical results, we report on the effect of using high-throughput sequencing to estimate the phylogenies used to calculate PD metrics, and we discuss difficulties in selecting appropriate diversity indices. We focused on two of the most speciose angiosperm families in prairies-Asteraceae and Fabaceae-and compared 12 PD metrics and four traditional measures of biodiversity between three North American prairie sites. The varying results from the literature and from the current data reveal the wide range of applications of PD metrics and the necessity for many more empirical studies. The accumulation of results from further investigations will eventually lead to a scientific understanding upon which conservation planners can make informed decisions about where to apply limited preservation funds.",
keywords = "Asteraceae, Fabaceae, angiosperms, biodiversity assessment, conservation prioritization, next-generation sequencing",
author = "{Roxanne Kellar}, P. and Ahrendsen, {Dakota L.} and Aust, {Shelly K.} and Jones, {Amanda R.} and Pires, {J. Chris}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3732/apps.1400108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Applications in Plant Sciences",
issn = "2168-0450",
publisher = "Botanical Society of America Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity Comparison among Phylogenetic Diversity Metrics and between Three North American Prairies

AU - Roxanne Kellar, P.

AU - Ahrendsen, Dakota L.

AU - Aust, Shelly K.

AU - Jones, Amanda R.

AU - Pires, J. Chris

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Protection of Earth's ecosystems requires identification of geographical areas of greatest biodiversity. Assessment of biodiversity begins with knowledge of the evolutionary histories of species in a geographic area. Multiple phylogenetic diversity (PD) metrics have been developed to describe biodiversity beyond species counts, but sufficient empirical studies, particularly at fine phylogenetic scales, have not been conducted to provide conservation planners with evidence for incorporating PD metrics into selection of priority regions. We review notable studies that are contributing to a growing database of empirical results, we report on the effect of using high-throughput sequencing to estimate the phylogenies used to calculate PD metrics, and we discuss difficulties in selecting appropriate diversity indices. We focused on two of the most speciose angiosperm families in prairies-Asteraceae and Fabaceae-and compared 12 PD metrics and four traditional measures of biodiversity between three North American prairie sites. The varying results from the literature and from the current data reveal the wide range of applications of PD metrics and the necessity for many more empirical studies. The accumulation of results from further investigations will eventually lead to a scientific understanding upon which conservation planners can make informed decisions about where to apply limited preservation funds.

AB - Protection of Earth's ecosystems requires identification of geographical areas of greatest biodiversity. Assessment of biodiversity begins with knowledge of the evolutionary histories of species in a geographic area. Multiple phylogenetic diversity (PD) metrics have been developed to describe biodiversity beyond species counts, but sufficient empirical studies, particularly at fine phylogenetic scales, have not been conducted to provide conservation planners with evidence for incorporating PD metrics into selection of priority regions. We review notable studies that are contributing to a growing database of empirical results, we report on the effect of using high-throughput sequencing to estimate the phylogenies used to calculate PD metrics, and we discuss difficulties in selecting appropriate diversity indices. We focused on two of the most speciose angiosperm families in prairies-Asteraceae and Fabaceae-and compared 12 PD metrics and four traditional measures of biodiversity between three North American prairie sites. The varying results from the literature and from the current data reveal the wide range of applications of PD metrics and the necessity for many more empirical studies. The accumulation of results from further investigations will eventually lead to a scientific understanding upon which conservation planners can make informed decisions about where to apply limited preservation funds.

KW - Asteraceae

KW - Fabaceae

KW - angiosperms

KW - biodiversity assessment

KW - conservation prioritization

KW - next-generation sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941621762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941621762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3732/apps.1400108

DO - 10.3732/apps.1400108

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26191461

AN - SCOPUS:84941621762

VL - 3

JO - Applications in Plant Sciences

JF - Applications in Plant Sciences

SN - 2168-0450

IS - 7

M1 - 8

ER -